In: Business and Management

Submitted By lashonshome1
Words 1620
Pages 7
Case Analysis
Blockbuster vs. Netflix

1. Mission/External Analysis
2. Industrial Analysis
3. Internal Analysis
4. Financial Analysis
5. Assumptions/Challenge/Objectives
6. Alternative Analysis
7. Resolution

For years Blockbuster dominated the movie rental scene crushing the local competition with its wide selection, huge inventories and longer rental periods. Over the years though, Blockbuster has lost it strangle hold over the competition and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in September 2010. Blockbuster competition won because they evolved to meet the demands of the current customer. The biggest rival that Blockbuster competed with was Netflix, which was started in 1997 and established its subscription service in 1999. The competitive forces in the movie rental marketplace expanded in the early 90’s with the creation of the DVD movies. Like pervious attempts to move away from VHS tapes, DVDs players were very costly at first. As time went on, DVD’s players became cheaper to produce and many of them where incorporated with home theater systems due to the demand of people who wanted to watch movies on their own big screen. With this boom in DVDs’ it created a demand in the movie rental marketplace. Since Blockbuster was apart of Viacom, which was a multimedia conglomerate, they were able to provide them with supplier power and buyer power. Blockbuster was able to outspend the competition, which in turn created Barriers to Entry for Rival video stores. All of these forces pushed away Substitutes to Blockbuster like Hollywood Video or Family Video. These smaller video rental chains did not create enough of a rivalry to really hurt Blockbuster until Netflix came along. Blockbuster had loss in the millions and into the billions towards the end of the 90’s and into the beginning of the…...

Similar Documents


...success of Netflix? Contrast the pricing in relation to traditional Video rental stores and describe how it evolved over time in support of Netflix’s changing business strategy. The pricing strategy had a huge hand on the initial success of Netflix. It used a market-oriented pricing approach and set its price based on analysis and research of the target market. Some of the factors incorporated by Netflix into its pricing strategy that contributed to its success were: i. Rent 3 movies at the cost of one VOD rental ii. Eliminated Late Fees / penalty pricing approach adopted by Blockbuster and other rental stores iii. Transitioned from market-oriented pricing to value-based pricing through the introduction of unlimited rentals iv. Movie recommendations to everyone whether / not they subscribed to Netflix services Netflix captured the market for initial DVD player adopters by providing customers with DVD formats that weren’t available in traditional movie rental stores yet. Netflix offered 3 movies for a month at $17.99 while rental stores offered a single hit movie at $18. The approach Netflix took to eliminate late fees and have a movie with the customer at all times helped Netflix capture market share instantly. As the stocking for DVD’s grew more complex, the pricing remained the same but they provided an unlimited rental policy that greatly appealed to customers that were concerned with late fees and limited rentals. Hence as the market share grew Netflix......

Words: 1480 - Pages: 6


...Netflix is the leading movie and television streaming company which was established in 2007. Netflix began as a disc rental company which offered door to door movie rentals at a monthly rate. The company also began a video streaming service which consumers pay a monthly subscription fee to access thousands of movies and television shows at a low rate of $7.99 per month. This allows the user to watch at anytime, anywhere with an internet access point and a viewing device, to stream as many movies or videos as they like. Netflix has negotiated terms with networks managing titles to either receive a profit of each title or a cut from subscription fees. How strong are the competitive forces in the movie rental marketplace? Do a fiveforces analysis to support your answer. The competitive forces in the movie rental marketplace are not very strong. Netflix’s major competitor is actually just RedBox. Most people would think Blockbuster Express kiosks would be a serious competitor, but actually Blockbuster Express (not related to Blockbuster LLC or Blockbuster stores) is operated by RedBox. According to NPD Group, a market research company, overall disc rentals was down in 2011, but it still managed be the top source of movie media in homes with 62 percent of transactions being disc transactions. At its peak, Blockbuster had operated approximately 9,000 stores, they are now operating approximately 900 stores worldwide. RedBox, a recent competitor, operates approximately 42,000 kiosks....

Words: 2026 - Pages: 9

Blockbuster vs Netflix

...Blockbuster vs. Netflix Introduction Blockbuster opened in 1985 and in its “first 20 years of business, the movie rental giant opened 9.100 stores in 25 countries” (Laudon, 2007, p. 121).   Netflix launched in 1998 using a new business model and became Blockbusters biggest threat. The paradigm shift in the rental industry from having to travel to a store and rent a movie to being able to have a movie delivered to your mailbox changed the way people think about media entertainment. The next shift will be having the technology to download movies and shows directly to a television. Analysis Blockbuster and Netflix are using two different information system strategies. Blockbuster, which is a traditional retail store with a physical location focused on creating a market niche.   It used “an automated point-of-sale system” and was able to use “these data to monitor sales and to analyze the demographics, and rental and sales patterns for each store to improve its marketing decisions” (Laudon, 2007, p. 121).   Netflix came onto the scene with a completely different strategy, product differentiation. Emphasizing convenience, they created a system to allow consumers to order movies sent to their customers homes and returned on the individual’s time schedule. Netflix was able to use mass customization and give consumers an individually tailored service without increasing the needed resources. Using the Business Value Chain Model, Netflix has used information technology on......

Words: 1034 - Pages: 5


...Project Proposal The proposed organizations for this project are Netflix and Blockbuster. This research project will demonstrate why the two companies changed to stay in competition. Additionally, this research project will demonstrate how technology obligates organizations to change their business model. Blockbuster opened their first store in 1985 in Dallas, Texas and expanded to operate 6,500 video rental stores (Blockbuster, n.d.). The organization was a competitor in the small video rental stores by providing a wider selection of movies and game rentals. Because of the positive, public acceptance Blockbuster expanded quickly and opened stores across the nation, London and Canada (Blockbuster, n.d.). Netflix was founded in 1997 in Scotts Valle, California. The organization website was launched in April 14, 1998 providing to the public online-per-rental model. Netflix introduced the monthly subscription concept in September, 1999. In February, 2007 Netflix introduced the video-on-demand via the Internet. At the present time Netflix provide services in Canada, Latin America, the Caribbean and Europe. Netflix is recognized to be one of the most successful dot-com ventures (Funding Universe, 2011). ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES Blockbuster was purchased by Dish Network after filing for bankruptcy in late September 2010. The company has closed a large number of stores at it works to create an online video-streaming outlet (Merced, 2010). Blockbuster’s edge......

Words: 2065 - Pages: 9

Blockbuster Contra Netflix: ¿Cuál Vencerá?

...comodidad o te llama más la atención el método tradicional? Ante este escenario, a continuación se analizará el caso de la campal disputa entre los dos titanes del mercado de renta y venta de videos; el mercado tradicional de Blockbuster versus su eterno rival virtual Netflix. A su vez, se discutirá cómo estos han adaptado la tecnología a sus diferentes pero similares servicios y modelos de negocio. La pregunta que queda por hacer es, ¿cuál vencerá? Resumen Los autores Kenneth Laudon & Jane Laudon (2007), nos proveen en su caso de estudio Blockbuster contra Netflix: ¿Cuál vencerá?, la historia de dos modelos de negocios revolucionarios en el mercado de la renta y venta de videos y la competencia que se ha creado entre ellos. Dos modelos de negocios fundamentados en la misma base pero con un sistema operativo totalmente distanciado el uno del otro. Un modelo pionero en la renta y venta tradicional de videos versus un modelo que le hace su competencia desde el ciberespacio. Este caso refleja la importancia de la tecnología en los negocios actuales y cómo una compañía intenta reinventarse para poder competir contra su rival en el mercado en el que ejerció como líder y pionera. ¿Quién sobrevivirá? Descripción de lo que pasó en el caso La empresa Blockbuster fue la pionera en explotar la renta de películas mediante el uso de cadenas de tiendas en diversos países desde el año 1985 cuando incursionó en este mercado. “En sus primeros 20 años de existencia, el gigante de la......

Words: 4860 - Pages: 20

Failure Analysis/Change Strategy: Blockbuster vs Netflix

...Strategy: Blockbuster vs Netflix LDR/531 Failure Analysis/Change Strategy: Blockbuster vs Netflix Organizational Behavior Theories The organizational behavior theories which explains Netflix’s success are two; decision-making and systems approaches. Netflix made the monumental decision to become a virtual dvd rental versus a brick and mortor provided a solution in the company’s goal and vision to be ahead of technological advances in the industry. Netflix took on the systems approach in understanding and measuring the company’s input and output processes. Netflix uses the systems approach to integrate and drive processes in developing adaptive capacities, driving innovation. Blockbusters organizational behavior theory focus was on scientific leadership. The company placed a great deal of focus on how to become more effective in the company’s brick and mortor business, redefining company objectives and direction. How employing this theory failed the company was the leadership decision to not pledge the same level or more focus on the click initiative which the company could not capture the needed momentum in becoming competitive with Netflix. Blockbuster could have had a more competitive edge over Netflix sustaining its presence in the industry if only the company could define better performance practices leveraging its click business over its brick and mortor presence. Role of the organization on the Fail/Success So how did an upstart company like Netflix tale......

Words: 1224 - Pages: 5


...Accounting Netflix, Inc.: A Financial Analysis Andrew Gaines This paper was written for Professor Bearden!s Financial Statement Analysis course. Netflix, Inc. is the leading provider of online movie rentals in the United States. Out of an approximate 12,000,000 online movie subscribers in 2008, subscribers to Netflix constituted about 9,400,000. The company has strong profitability ratios as revenues increased 13.2% from 2007 to 2008 and net income increased 24.6%. Netflix has higher costs of revenues than its competitor, Blockbuster Inc., but it has outperformed that company. Blockbuster experienced net losses in 2007 and 2008. Netflix!s current liabilities have increased to match revenue growth, while long-term liabilities have increased to recognize an increase in lease obligations. Equity decreased from 2007 to 2008 by 19.2% due to an increase in treasury stock. This financial statement analysis of Netflix, Inc. encompasses the years ending December 31 of 2006, 2007, and 2008. Financial data was gathered from the 2006, 2007, and 2008 10-K filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the company!s 2009 Q-1 filing for its first quarter of 2009. Additional data was also taken from the company!s website: http://www. For comparative purposes, data was gathered from one of Netflix!s competitors, Blockbuster, Inc. Data for Blockbuster was gathered on it company website, and its 2007 and 2008 10-K filings with the SEC. Industry......

Words: 6240 - Pages: 25

Blockbuster & Netflix

...Netflix (discussed above), the largest online DVD rental service in the U.S., offers a flat-fee DVD movie rental service that, by 2007, was serving over 6 million subscribers from its collection of 75,000 titles.32 Subscribers can use the website's browse function to search for movies by genre, and use an extensive movie recommendation system based on other users' ratings to add to their ordered list for delivery via mail. At its initial launch, the Netflix business model was based on a pay-per-rental service, but this initial pricing model did not succeed, and the company almost failed. It was clear to management Netflix had to rejig its business model and, between September and October 1999, it reinvented itself with a subscription model (the ‘Marque Program’). It ended its pay-per-rental model entirely, and evolved the monthly fee program to allow subscribers to rent any number of DVDs per month (although only a limited number at any one time). The model was supported by a system of regional distribution centers which ensured next day delivery to over 90% of subscribers. Clearly, it took a while to be able to ascertain the right price points and the manner of pricing that was most acceptable to the customer base for its new service; but as Netflix management figured out viewer convenience, wants and willingness to pay, it adjusted its business model accordingly. This ability to perceive and adapt saved Netflix and laid the foundation for its growth and development: by 2006...

Words: 2934 - Pages: 12

Netflix vs Blockbuster

...Introduction: Netflix: After selling his first company Pure Software Reed Hasting founded this completely new business. Hasting sensed the opportunity for online movie rentals business and founded the company Netflix in 1997. Netflix launched its online subscription service in 1999. Netflix was successful in acquiring about 2million customers in four years. Netflix found that a lot of new customers are attracted towards its online movie rental service because of the information provided by Netflix about each movie in Netflix’s rental library which included critic reviews, member reviews, online trailers and ratings, and the ease with which they could find and order movies; the elimination of late fees and due dates; and convenience of being provided the postage return envelope for mailing the DVD back to Netflix. The company ran a marvelous advertising and marketing campaign from 2001 to 2008.For this reason, company achieved a high level of consumer awareness of Netflix name, its logo, and its movie rental service. Netflix had 2007 revenues of $1.2 billion (up from $501 million in 2004) and its 100,000 movie titles (up from 55,000 in 2005).By July 2008 Netflix had 8.4 million subscribers. Block Buster: Blockbuster was founded in Dallas Texas in 1985. Blockbuster had followed an extensive growth strategy, and achieving a peak of 9,094 companies operated and franchised movie stores worldwide by the year-end 2004. Blockbuster had 3,291 international store locations at the...

Words: 2629 - Pages: 11

Case 8 Netflix Versus Blockbuster Versus Video-on-Demand

...UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, SYDNEY FACULTY OF BUSINESS GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT Written Case Analysis Case 8 Netflix versus Blockbuster versus Video-on-Demand Report to: Martin Completed as part of the requirements for Strategic Management (21715) Contents Executive Summary p. 3 Introduction p. 4 Volkswagen AG Pre-1993 p. 4 Issues facing the auto industry and Volkswagen AG in the 1990’s p. 5 Financial performance between 1993 and 2001 p. 6 Labour policies p. 7 Leadership p. 8 Recommendations p. 9 Conclusion p. 9 References p. 10 Appendices Executive Summary With the autocratic management style of Ferdinand Piëch, VW was able to expand and grow during a time when there were increasing cost pressures on automakers world wide. Innovations in the manufacturing process through integration and redesign of the value chain helped VW group reduce set up costs, manufacturing costs and labour costs while significantly reducing development times and costs of new models. Although Piëch was basically a one man band having control of the R & D, Quality, Production and Purchasing departments, his direction has left the incoming CEO with a solid base to further develop and grow the VW group. His vision and drive have placed VW in the position of number one automaker in Europe with market share well ahead of the nearest competitor. He has also......

Words: 3296 - Pages: 14


...COMPANY CASE Netflix: Disintermediator or Disintermediated? PRESENTED BY: DANIEL RICARDO ORDOÑEZ 201312625 MARIA LUCIA PACHON 201311104 YALILE KATHERIN ROA 201313192 THE SABANA´S UNIVERSITY BUSSINESS ADMINISTRATION MARKETING GROUP 1.2 2015 1. BACKGRAUND Netflix is a company that was created from the need generated by getting movies to watch from the comfort of the house, although at that time the companies who led this market were Blockbuster and Redbox , but to get them you had to approach a local Blockbuster or go a supermarket or store nearby where a dispenser Redbox addition these had a specific time to be returned, if not met you could have a fine is found, Netflix identify these weaknesses in them and became its advantages as well when you wanted to watch a film could access the internet make your Netflix account and solicitabas the list of movies you wished to see them received and send you the movies , these could be the time you wished and return , so Netflix quickly gained the lead. But with technological advancement and different devices that were created Netflix realized that people prefer to search online movies so they should not leave home or wait for them to arrive , so the company decided to create direct platform on which there are not only movies but also get series , plus Netflix decided also be associated with the different technological advances for these Netflix had already built into the device as we see when we buy a......

Words: 2422 - Pages: 10


...* Should Blockbuster have known that dramatic change to their Business Plans would be necessary? Blockbuster didn’t have a technology problem, because digital distribution was minimal, but rather a customer problem. It gave customers no reason to visit stores in lieu of the latest and greatest hit. ( Forbes Nov 8, 2013) * When should they have sensed or perceived a change to their business would be necessary? Lack of ease of accessibility and higher prices in connection to other video rental outlets. Blockbusters main competitors such as Netflix, Redbox, and many On Demand services seem to have a much better grasp of the importance of instant access at a lower price. (Blockbuster Inc. (SWOT analysis). * When should they have innovated or changed their plans to comprehend the perceived changes? Blockbuster’s biggest mistakes were that it failed to modernize its business strategy to include a multi-channel avenue for its customers to decide how they wanted to rent movies. Movie renters were and still are moving away from the traditional format of renting movies. Failure to adapt to changing consumer behavior and new technology helped companies like Netflix and Redbox gain considerable ground in the video rental industry. * What should they have considered when looking at their Porter’s Model? What do you think kept them from......

Words: 980 - Pages: 4

Netflix and Blockbuster Battle for Market Leadership Marketing Essay

...Movie retail industry includes such companies that rent DVDs, Blu-ray discs and even video games which are usable on home-based electronic equipment (Espedido Julian, 2010). Many companies are participants in this lucrative business and they include such companies as Wal-Mart, Netflix, Blockbuster, Intelliflix, Redbox and GameZnFlix among others. Both Netflix and Blockbuster companies are presently the leaders in the rental movie industry and therefore the major rivals in the rental movie industry. As to Blockbuster, it has a quite lengthy convention in the business. The Blockbuster has existed since the year 1985, even as Netflix entered its 12th anniversary this year. This gives Blockbuster an edge of existence over its close competitor Netflix. This paper intends to critically provide an in depth analysis for Arthur Thompson's case study entitled "Competition in the Movie Rental Industry in 2008: Netflix and Blockbuster Battle for Market Leadership." It will comb thoroughly issues like the trends which affect either negatively or positively the movie rental industry with utmost reference to Netflix and Blockbuster in respect to their fight for the market headship, scrutinize in detail the competitive movie rental industry environment, and by extension give detailed discussion on the use of both the SWOT as well as reasonable scorecard to evaluate Netflix's battle strategy for market leadership on the whole. The video rental industry (formally known as home entertainment...

Words: 1316 - Pages: 6


...NETFLIX Inc. Case Study BMGT500 Submitted by: Moid Ahmad Under guidance of: Mr. Roger L. Powell Introduction Netflix Inc. is considered to be in the video entertainment industry, which distributes to consumers through movie theaters, airlines, hotels, and in-home (Netflix, Inc; 2009). Netflix and its competitors serve in-home consumers specifically through a number of alternative channels, making up the different strategic groups or segments of their portion of the entire industry which includes brick and mortar (Blockbuster) and DVD vending machine rentals (Redbox), mail delivery (Netflix and Blockbuster), and online rental (Netflix, Amazon, and iTunes), pay-per-view video (available from specialty suppliers such as HBO and Showtime through your cable provider), and on-demand services (VOD; those offered through digital cable providers), as well as brick and mortar (Wal-Mart and Best Buy) and online purchasing (Amazon and iTunes). Historically speaking, this industry began as stand-alone brick and mortar rental stores such as Blockbuster and the later entrant Hollywood Video/Movie Gallery (which for the most part were all corporately-owned, with small portions of franchised locations) and local rental businesses. They started in VHS and progressed to DVDs along with technology and household adoption. They would typically carry about 2,500 titles and performed better when copies were rented and out of the store—the longer period the better. (Spinola) This......

Words: 3702 - Pages: 15

Blockbuster vs Netflix

...Blockbuster vs Netflix Q1. (a) What is Blockbuster’s Business Model? (b) How successful has it been? Ans: (a) We can define Blockbuster’s Business Model as a- Bricks Model. Because, * It has video rentals & sales stores. * Customers have to come to the stores to buy or rent movies from these stores. * It is a total physical process. (b) It was a successful model before Netflix entered into the video rental market. The reason behind that is, * They’ve 40% share of the whole U.S. video rental market . * From the video sales they’ve got $16 billion. * Enjoying a market share that will be gaining by very few firms in any industry. Q2. (a) What industry & technology for as have challenged that business model? (b) What problems why’ve created? Ans: (a) Industry -- Netflix Inc, 1998. Technology -- Online based video rental & sales. * Also offering postal service. * No need for a physical verification. (b) Problems created by that industry are, * They’ve offering value to this customer’s by giving the internet service. * People don’t need to go out to buy movies. * No more transportation cost will occur. Q3. (a) Is Blockbuster developing successful solutions to its problem? ...

Words: 715 - Pages: 3

Maetel Legend (2) | → Download | Capítulo Anterior