Civil Procedure V. Criminal Procedure

In: Business and Management

Submitted By jasminerose
Words 940
Pages 4
Civil Procedure v. Criminal Procedure
ENC 1102 34
Week 11
Individual Work

Civil Procedure v. Criminal Procedure Civil procedure relates to the process where two parties bring a case to the court for a decision on a particular problem. These problems can include but are not limited to divorces, estate distribution, work men’s comp., injury cases, or even matters such as discrimination in the workplace. Criminal procedure applies to the process where the state or federal government is charging and trying someone for a crime that was committed (Civil Procedure, 2012). The rules in civil procedure are different than those in criminal procedure because the actions that need to be taken are different.
Firstly, civil procedure requires that a civil case must begin by filing a complaint. The complaint is then, served to the offending party. Once the defending party receives the complaint, they then drafts and files an answer with the court. A party in a civil case can be anyone including people, businesses, and government personnel. When the parties go in front of the court in a civil case, it is to determine whether a person was injured and if they were injured, how much should be compensated for that injury. All of this information pertaining to the civil case is specifically drafted into the court documents (American Bar, 2012).
Civil cases, also, have some Constitutional protection in place. For example, the parties involved in a case must file and receive consent of the court to start the discovery process. During the discovery process, the parties are free to investigate each other’s belongings and property plus any other information, so that they can gain access to necessary evidence for their case. Although, if the parties search an area that was not in the discovery documents, that piece of evidence will not be considered in court because they do not have…...

Similar Documents

Criminal Procedure

... The process of criminal procedure involves regulations, which aid the order of procedures the government authorities use to apply criminal laws. The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth amendment, and the Supremes Court understanding of the constitution are important for the study of criminal procedures (Zalman, 2008). The Federal Rules in criminal procedures ensure citizens’ rights to due process, right to a fair trial, right to equal protection, and right to lie, liberty, and property. Due process and crime control models play a major role in shaping criminal procedures. Both models hold some form of constitutional values required in the society we live in (Zalman, 2008). In this paper I will briefly discuss the similarities and the differences and how they have an effect on criminal procedure policies. Crime control model is known as the “presumption of guilt” model. This model assumes defendants are guilty, police and prosecutors are precise in their choices to arrest, apprehend, and prosecute suspects. As a result, the remaining steps in the criminal procedures become automatic and the investigative stages can be opposed (Zalman, 2008). Defendants are moved swiftly through the criminal justice system because he or he is presumed guilty until proven innocent in the court of law. Due process is based on the adversary law system, which believes an individual is innocent until proven guilty in the court of law. The adversary system prohibits law......

Words: 1074 - Pages: 5

Criminal Procedure

...Criminal procedure policy paper CJA/364 DEC/19/2012 Susan Strick Criminal procedure policy paper Criminal procedure is broken down into two models and was designed by a professor who studied law at Stand Ford University his name was Herbert Packer. The first model is due process, this process believes in the rights of the individual this will be known as politically liberal. The second model is crime control this supports to regulate the conduct and behavior of individuals. This is considered politically conservative. These models are intended to embody the sets of different values that run the criminal justice system. In this paper both of the criminal procedure will be discussed and compared to show the similarities and differences. This will also be a way of figuring how the effects of policies in the criminal procedure this will be done by looking at the amendments made in the constitution of the United States looking at the fourth, fifth and sixth amendment and also the fourteenth. The fourteenth amendment including the bill of rights will be a critical aspect of achieving the goal of this paper. The procedure that is most used in the criminal proceedings is the due process model. As an individual a person will try to preserve the standard of holding their right to life, property, and liberty. As an individual a person will not let go of the rights without undergoing the right due process promised to them that is stated in the bill of rights. An officer even......

Words: 1132 - Pages: 5

Criminal Procedure

...Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause Article Summary Richard Smith CJA 364 February 24, 2013 Matthew Taylor In the summary of a Bethlehem Twp man being arrested for drug paraphernalia, police also found a 9mm Russian-made pistol which lead to a charge of possession of a hand gun. Township law enforcement officers had probable cause when they received numerous complaints of vehicles regularly driving up and only staying a short length of time at the residence (Warner, 2013). After conducting a lengthy investigation, police obtained a search warrant for the home. While conducting the search warrant, law enforcement officials found unpackaged marijuana hidden inside a toilet, inside the suspect’s pocket, marijuana in plastic bags elsewhere and were able to seize a scale commonly used to weigh the marijuana. That is when they also found the 9mm hand gun in the home. Law enforcement had probable cause because of the complaints and followed correct procedures to obtain the warrant. The suspect was charged with intent to deliver, possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia. The probable cause that the officers had was from the calls that they received from various neighbors. The officers then followed correct procedures to obtain the warrant/arrest warrant. Judges may issue the warrant based on probable cause from the officers. The warrant/arrest warrant needs to be considered as well that the warrant itself does not include the conviction of the suspect....

Words: 448 - Pages: 2

Criminal Procedure

...A team of students will study a case against Stu Dents and the murder of Uma Opee. Stu Dent was accused of murdering Uma Opee, whom he had a relationship with. His DNA was found at the scene of the crime under the victims figure nails. The victim’s body was found tire with rope, stabbed 13 times, and multiple bruises. On October 19th, Uma Opee’s body was found in a vacant building approximately five miles from her home. The day prior she had worked her shift at a local music store and after work walked to her home. The defendant in this case also reseated arrest and assault a police officer. In the case of State of North Carolina v. Stu Dents, the jury found the defendant Stu Dents guilty of the following crime: homicide, assault of a police officer, kidnapping, and crimes related to drugs. A proposal was developed to analyze how the charges against Stu Dent would be implemented along with sentencing and opposing arguments. A recap of charges, verdict, violations, and possible sentencing outcomes in the case will be analyzed according to North Carolina law. The defense and prosecution will provide opposing arguments in accordance with North Carolina to request concurrent sentencing. It will be vital for this team of students analyzing this case to provide closing arguments to support their recommendations and the laws under North Carolina to determine whether or not Stu Dents has enough to escape the charges against him. Charges and Verdict North Carolina......

Words: 460 - Pages: 2

Criminal Procedure

...Criminal Procedure Policy Sesanee Lewis CJA/364 January 20, 2014 Walsh, Timothy Criminal Procedure Policy Due process and crime control model shapes the procedures of polices regarding criminals and law enforcement. Due process gives citizens the right to be treated as innocent until proven guilty which is the opposite to the crime control model; you are guilty until proven innocent. Two different approaches, one is a process in which citizens is ensured law enforcement conduct themselves within legal procedures during arrest and the collection of evidence; the other process relying on the integrity of law enforcement by not questioning probable cause nor the collection of evidence to show the guilt of an offender. Due Process gives citizens of America the right to not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without law enforcement going obtaining a warrant by a judge. The rights of citizens by way of due process guarantee a fair process within the criminal justice system. The due process model system of values revolves around the concept of primarily of the individual rights and the complementary concept of limitation of official power of the government. Power is always subject to abuse (Griffiths, 1970). Due process limits this power by give law enforcement rules and regulations as to what they can and cannot do to arrest a citizen and obtain evidence for an arrest. The criminal procedure of due process begins at law enforcement legally......

Words: 1150 - Pages: 5

Legal Civil Procedures

...Texas State Supplement to Accompany Civil Litigation 7E Peggy N. Kerley Joanne Banker Hames, J.D. Paul A. Sukys, J.D., Ph.D. Prepared by Peggy N. Kerley Updated in 2013 by Jennifer Carpenter Australia • Brazil • Mexico • Singapore • United Kingdom • United States i © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. ii PART I Introduction to Civil Litigation Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................iv PART I INTRODUCTION TO CIVIL LITIGATION CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 Litigation and the Paralegal..................................................................................................................1 The Courts and Jurisdiction .................................................................................................................2 PART II INITIATING LITIGATION CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 CHAPTER 5 CHAPTER 6 CHAPTER 7 Preliminary Considerations and Procedures.......................................................................................9 Investigation and Evidence .................................................................................................................10 The Complaint...............................................................................................................................

Words: 31166 - Pages: 125

Civil Procedure

...Jamie Clark Week 3-Individual Work Civil Procedure Relevant Evidence | Why is it relevant? | Type | Admissible? | Client believes that she was a recent victim of employment discrimination based on gender which occurred at Rikards-Hayley, an investment banking firm located at 121 Centre St., New York, New York. | This is relevant because it is closely connected with the case. It is relevant because it states the issue at hand. | Testimony | Yes, this is admissible. | Her first job was in training and development, where she received nothing but superior evaluations from her supervisors. Approximately two years ago she was promoted to acting manager of the department. As acting manager she received superior evaluations. | This is relevant because it shows background information pertaining to the case. | Documentary | Yes, this is admissible. | Five months ago the company decided to fill the manager position permanently. Bennett applied for the position. She was told by her supervisor, Darren Blackwood, that management liked her work but that she did not quite fit the image they were seeking. She needed to lose weight as well as change her attitude toward male employees. She was perceived as being “too assertive.” It would be better, she was told, if she could show more deference. Bennett was not hired as manager. Instead, the company hired Martina Yardly. | This is relevant to the case because it gives more background information on the case directly. |......

Words: 421 - Pages: 2

Criminal Procedures Case Digest

...20. People v. Relova Facts: 5 Feb 1, 1975 - Police searched the ice plant owned by Opulencia; they discovered electric wiring, devices and contraptions had been installed without necessary authority from city govt 6 Nov 24, 1975 - Asst. City Fixcal filed info against Opulencia for violation of a city ordinance which prohibits unauthorized wiring installations. 7 Opulencia pleaded not guilty and filed motion to dismiss on the ground that the crime had alrdy prescribed (offense charged was a light felony w/c prescribes 2 mos from discovery thereof.) 8 Lower court dismissed the case 9 Acting City Fiscal filed another info for theft of electric power 10 Opulencia filed Motion to Quash upon the ground of double jeopardy 11 Judge Relova granted motion and dismissed the case. 12 Motion for Recon denied, hence this appeal Issue: WON there was double jeopardy Ratio Decidendi: A person who was charged for violating a city ordinance for having installed a metering device to lower his electric bills which was dismissed for prescription of the offense may not be charged again for theft of electric power under the RPC Reasons: 13 The second sentence of Art. IV Sec. 22 embodies an exception to the gen. Proposition: the consti protection, against double jeopardy is available although the prior offense charged under an ordinance be different from the offense charged subsequently under a national statute such as the RPC, provided that both offenses spring from the same......

Words: 23071 - Pages: 93

Criminal Procedure

...Rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments vary. Their impact does take on a whole new light when you scope out the criminal proceeding type of jurisdictional stance if it’s looked at from a different scope and a different perspective when carrying on in the action of law. The Fourth Amendment for police officers has an impact on the everyday working person as they are commuting on highways and are subject to traffic stops for violation of codes. Police officers are given the legal authority to pull over individuals that have been suspected of committing a traffic violation. If upon the officer pulling someone over, he can legally search the car only with probable cause. For example most people understand that we intrinsically have a right to freedoms and for you to have the ability to reveal what part of your life to the public you want is up to you as a person. The Fourth Amendment protects you against “unreasonable search” and seizures by state or federal law enforcement. Authorities cannot, by law, search your vehicle or your person without probable cause. If the officer illegally seizes evidence in that search they cannot use it against a person in a trial. This is also known as the “fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine” wherein evidence that was seized from an officer from a direct result of an improper search cannot by law be admissible at trial. The Fourth Amendment remands fuzzy as to what the definition of probable cause is but an officer would......

Words: 1491 - Pages: 6

Civil Procedure

...Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. ACT [21st March 1908] NO. V OF 1908 An Act to consolidate and amend the laws relating to the Procedure of the Courts of Civil Judicature. WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate and amend the laws relating to the procedure of the Courts of Civil Judicature; It is hereby enacted as follows: - PRELIMINARY 1.-(l) This Act may be cited as the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. (2) It shall come into force on 1[(3) It extends to the whole of Pakistan.] the first day of January 1909. 2. In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,(1) "Code" includes rules: (2) "decree" means the formal expression of an adjudication which, so far as regards the court expressing it, conclusively determines the rights of the parties which regard to all or any of the matters in controversy in the suit and may be either preliminary or final. It shall be deemed to include the rejection of a plaint 2[the determination of any question within section 144 and an order under rule 60, 98, 99, 101, or 103 of Order XXI] but shall not include; (a) any adjudication form which an appeal lies as an appeal from an order, or (b) any order of dismissal for default. Explanation. - A decree is preliminary when further proceedings have to be taken before the suit can be completely dispose of. It is final when such adjudication completely disposes of the suit. It may be partly preliminary and partly......

Words: 97619 - Pages: 391

Criminal Procedure

...Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause Article Summary David L. Clay CJA/315 February 8, 2016 Scott Horwath Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause Article Summary Manuel Celis-Acosta is accused to be the ring leader of the Fast and Furious Operation who helped organize the transfer and purchase of about 2,000 weapons to the Sinaloa Castel. He is also accused of providing the weapons used in the kill of border patrol agents Brian Terry. In April 2, 2010 Manuel was stopped by Phoenix Police and booked to jail for cocaine possession and two handguns were confiscated by police at that stop. Manuel Acosta followed by ATF agents for 18 months for the Fast and Furious Operation was previously arrested twice in 2010 violation related to drugs and guns but he was released. After 2 am in the morning Police detected a blue Chevy pick-up truck without its headlights. Police activated their lights and sirens after watching the truck and reports say that handguns were thrown out the windows by Acosta and two associates. At the stop police officer also found other weapons hidden in the backseat and between the front seats as well as numerous of scattered casings in the floor. All three individuals were arrested and booked into jail under different charges. Acosta for narcotics possession, Hector Carlon for aggravated DUI and drug possession and Julio Carrillo for misconduct with a weapon. Prosecutors received the case but it was never file. The case was send back to police for further......

Words: 1105 - Pages: 5

Criminal Procedure

...Criminal Procedure Policy Order and liberty are two areas within criminal procedure that have tension among one another (book). Order is a stronger approach toward the criminal justice system than liberty. Liberty concerns an individual’s rights to due process, which means everybody deserves the same rights when arrested regardless of the circumstances such as poor person versus a rich person. The two models that were developed by Herbert Packer were the crime control model and the due process model (book). Both models have similarities as well as differences and not one is “good” and the other “bad” according to Packer. The two primary goals within the criminal justice system are the need to enforce law and maintain social order and the need to protect people from injustice (defenseinvestigator). The fourth, fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendments play a signifigant role when analyzing both the due process model and the crime control model. This paper will further explore both models as well as how the models view the fourth, fifth, and sixth amendments and how the fourteenth amendment gives the same rights on a state level as well as federal. Crime Control Model The crime control model is a stern approach to the criminal justice system. As described by Hubert Packer, “the crime control model is like a conveyer belt, moving cases starting from arrest to conviction in a swift and fast process (Book).” Fact finding is what defines this model. If an officer makes......

Words: 1348 - Pages: 6

Criminal Procedures

...Criminal Behavior Lorenzo Reid Virginia College Online Abstract The following paper will address the different areas of the Psychological and Psychiatric Foundations of Criminal Behavior. Within this paper, every aspect from theories to what the law states when it comes to this state will be addressed. Criminal Behavior Doctor Leon Eisenberg once stated, "...persons who are seriously mentally ill are far more likely to be the victims of violence than its initiators." (Campbell) Yet how true is that? When it comes to mental illness, there have been several violent crimes that have been committed, and been blamed on mental illness. There are several shows for entertainment such as the show “Criminal Minds”, that attempts to bring a reality and understanding to mental illness and criminal behavior. This show gives a reality to the fact that people can be simply mentally ill and not simply criminals. In early society times, people simply did not take mental illness into account. It was thought that people, regardless of their mental state, should be accountable for their actions. Yet, in today’s society, this is not the case. Due to research and a better developed country, citizens are given an opportunity to show that their mental state was not steady when they committed a crime. So, what is it then, which motivated a person to kill or maim another? How can a person kill someone else, or a numerous amount of people, with no remorse? These questions and......

Words: 3479 - Pages: 14

Civil and Criminal Procedures

...Civil and Criminal Procedures–LEG 110 Define a Family. A family is a group of people who share are joined by blood, marriage, or adoption. It is also a group of people residing together consisting of parents, children, and other relatives by blood or marriage. Finally, a family is a group of people residing together who have consented to an arrangement similarly to those of blood or marriage. Explain What Constitutes a Marriage. Marriage is a legitimate contract between a man and a woman who mutually promise to live together in a relationship in law for life, or until the legal termination of their relationship. Once both parties have entered into a marriage contract, the legal status of both parties will have changed giving the husband and wife new rights obligations and benefits. Public policy is intensely in favor of the institution of marriage. Conventionally, marriage has been viewed as vital to the preservation of morals and is believed to sustain the family unit in our civilization. In the United States, marriage is regulated by individual states. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that states are permitted to reasonably regulate marriage by stipulating who can marry and the method in which they can dissolve a marriage. All states limit people to one living husband or wife at a time, and will not issue a marriage licenses to anyone who has not divorced a living spouse. Once someone is married, the only way they can be legally liberated from his or her spouse...

Words: 1478 - Pages: 6

Civil Procedure

...Civil Procedure Preliminary Assignment Sheet (Subject to Revision) Dated: 7/26/2010 Professor Yablon Fall 2010 Sections BC I INTRODUCTION TO THE LITIGATION PROCESS Mon. Aug. 30: Introduction to federal and state judicial systems CB 1-12, FRCP 1, 28 U.S.C. § 41, 44,132,133, 1331, 1332. What is the basic structure of the federal judiciary? How do federal courts differ from state courts? What are pleadings and what purpose do they serve? Tues. Aug. 31: Overview of the litigation process CB 13-21 FRCP 3, 4 What are the differences between subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction and venue? How is a lawsuit commenced in federal court? Wed. Sept. 1: Motions and Discovery Practice CB 20-34 FRCP 7(b), 26(b)(1) What is a motion? How does one go about making a motion in federal court? What is discovery and when does it take place? What is the difference between depositions and interrogatories? Thurs. Sept. 2: Motions and Discovery Practice (cont’d) CB 34-46 FRCP 8, 11, 12, 38, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292 What is a demurrer? Is it permitted in federal court today? What has replaced it? What is the significance of Rule 11 for pleadings? When are litigants in a federal lawsuit entitled to a trial by jury? What happens if plaintiff wants a jury trial and defendant does not? What if the reverse is true? When can an appeal be taken from a federal court decision? What kinds of issues......

Words: 3133 - Pages: 13

Sue Thomas F.B.I (0) | #srodowisko | Le Dernier Chasseur de sorcières Streaming Ultra-HD Le Dernier Chasseur de sorcières Streaming Ultra-HD Le Dernier Chasseur de sorcières Streaming Ultra-HD [2160p] gratuit en illimite - Notre monde actuel repose sur un pacte fragile régissant la paix entre humains et sorcières. Ces dernières sont autorisées à vivre secrètement parmi nous tant qu’elles n’ont pas recours à la magie noire. Kaulder, membre de la confrérie de la hache et ...