Constitutional Right or Religious Freedom

In: Social Issues

Submitted By Ginnyleeu
Words 1282
Pages 6
Constitutional Right or Religious Freedom
How the Representation of God in the Pledge of Allegiance Affects the American People

I. The phrase, “Under God” in the United States Pledge of Allegiance perpetuates the most significant form of discrimination in modern time.

II. “Samantha you stand for the pledge right now!” Exclaimed Mrs. Cline. Samantha knew she was doing what was right in her eyes, and it didn’t matter what the consequence was going to be. “That’s it! I have had it with your disruptive behavior little girl! Yes, this is Mrs. Cline from room 319, yes, I have a little girl hear refusing to say the pledge, and I need her removed from my classroom immediately!” As the Sherriff snapped the handcuffs on tight, a trickle of tears began to stream down her face. The rude laughter and picking of the other children was nothing but a loud roar in the air. It was like a wait before a trial hearing, where you really didn’t know what to expect until the evidence was all laid out. When her mother appeared in Mr. Jones’s office, the air stood still and no one could seem to look away. The snickering and mutters of the adults in the office buzzed about as Mrs. Smith and Mr. Jones were at war with words. “Don’t you ever think you can just arrest my daughter for not standing and saying something she has no knowledge or belief in!! I swear you better have a damn good apology for my daughter!,” Yelled Mrs. Smith as she rushed her daughter from the building.
1.) The United States of America was founded by European immigrants who sought to escape political persecution and for the freedom to practice their individual religious beliefs (Hamby, 2005, p.11).
a. America was founded on the belief that all Americans should have religious freedom; however, "A sense of proportion should also guide those who police the boundaries between church and state. Not every mention…...

Similar Documents

Constitutional Rights

...Constitutional Rights Strayer University PAD 525 Korb v. Raytheonr of 1989 is a case predicated on the freedom of speech and if a corporation has the right to dismiss you based on whether your speech directly or indirectly affects the company and a individual as there is associated with that company. Mr Korb was released from his duties as vice president for Washington operations of Raytheon Corporation because he spoke the media publicly and expressed views in direct conflict with the corporation's economic interest. It was noted that he spoke on behalf of the organization that he joined the executive board of the Committee for National Security (CNS). Although he was given permission by his company join CNS the company wanted Mr. Korb to still uphold the values and corporate initiatives the represented. Mr Korb gave a press conference on February 25, 1986 with CNS in the senate building during Korb's normal lunch hour in connection with the release of its annual alternative defense budget. Korb spoke at the press conference. Because this was during lunch and not an unscheduled break Mr. Korb felt like he wouldn’t be associated with Raytheon. The reporters present at the press definitely did as they reported to their outlets. The Washington Post newspaper the day after the press conference reported on the event. The article described Korb as a former assistant secretary of defense and now a private civil citizen working for arms maker Raytheon Co. It...

Words: 1255 - Pages: 6

Constitutional Rights

...Constitution of the State of Illinois ARTICLE I BILL OF RIGHTS SECTION 1. INHERENT AND INALIENABLE RIGHTS All men are by nature free and independent and have certain inherent and inalienable rights among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. To secure these rights and the protection of property, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. (Source: Illinois Constitution.) SECTION 2. DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law nor be denied the equal protection of the laws. (Source: Illinois Constitution.) SECTION 3. RELIGIOUS FREEDOM The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination, shall forever be guaranteed, and no person shall be denied any civil or political right, privilege or capacity, on account of his religious opinions; but the liberty of conscience hereby secured shall not be construed to dispense with oaths or affirmations, excuse acts of licentiousness, or justify practices inconsistent with the peace or safety of the State. No person shall be required to attend or support any ministry or place of worship against his consent, nor shall any preference be given by law to any religious denomination or mode of worship. (Source: Illinois Constitution.) SECTION 4. FREEDOM OF SPEECH All persons may speak, write and publish freely,......

Words: 4347 - Pages: 18

Constitutional Rights

...Constitutional Rights Constitutional Rights Constitutional rights are rights given to the people by the U.S. Constitution, and in particular, the Bill of Rights, and (first ten amendments). These amendments re going to include writ of habeas corpus, no bill of attained, no duties or taxes on transporting goods from one state to another, jury trials, freedom of religion, speech press, assembly, and petition, state militia to bear arms, no quartering of troops in homes, no unreasonable search and seizure, major crimes require indictment, no double jeopardy for the same crime, no self-incrimination, right to due process, right to just compensation for property taken by eminent domain, in criminal law, right to a speedy trial, to confront witnesses against one, and to counsel, trial by jury, etc (Szypszak, 2011). This paper is going to discuss the case of Korb v. Raytheon, 707 F. Supp. 63 (D. Mass. 1989) and the challenges that were faced with the constitutional rights, and discuss some other case that support the analysis of this case. Facts, Issues, & Rule: Korb v. Raytheon Raytheon was a large corporation that built equipment for the U.S. military, and Korb was an employee that was hired by the company for a brief period of time as a vice-president in their Washington, DC office. The Massachusetts Supreme Court summarized the facts of this case: In December, 1985, with Raytheon's permission, Korb joined the......

Words: 3345 - Pages: 14

Rights and Freedoms

...Rights and Freedoms The Bill of Right are the first Ten Amendments that were given to us by our founding fathers under the United States Constitution, which included: freedom of speech, freedom to practice any religion, the right to have weapons, the right of trial with a lawyer, and many more. These rights were opposed due to the fact that the Americans did not want to be controlled by England king any more. They wanted a country that would not be controlled by the country like many other countries around the world they wanted to be different and have the freedom to develop their own right and regulations. The Bill of Rights was written to provide all the people equal rights and freedoms to do as they please, yet they must obey the laws given to them in the United States Constitution, and “the peoples constitutional rights cannot lawfully be denied by government officials” (Patterson, 2011, p. 43). The freedom that was guaranteed to me in the first amendment that is relevant to my personal self is freedom of religion. As states by Thomas E. Patterson, Freedom of “religion: you are protected from having the religious beliefs of others imposed on you, and you are free to believe what you like” (Patterson, 2011, table 4-1). I personally can relate to this specific freedom, since I came of a country that has been in conflicts about who the land of Palestine (Israel) belongs to and which religion should take over. The way I see is that in Palestine (Israel) the Jewish people......

Words: 981 - Pages: 4

Constitutional Rights

...Assignment 3: Constitutional Rights Due Week 7 Strayer University Introduction With determination on how the First Amendment can be misunderstood, the case Korb v. Raytheon is being reviewed. In the case, a young man was in charge of a division. Mr. Korb was highly praised, and always stated to be the prominent source for the company. He went off to lunch as it had been a long day at a press conference, where he had to get a hold of the general population. Mr. Korb then proceeded to made comments that were of his personal views, which had gotten him in trouble with the company’s headquarters. Raytheon offered Korb to stay on the payroll, however, he was told to resign and relocate to another state where he can have a less influential position. He sued the company for wrongful termination and in violation of his right with the first amendment. Case Analysis Facts: Lawrence Korb worked as the Vice President of Raytheon Corporation, a major weapons company for military forces, who was in charge of their Washington Operations. After Korb was hired, he was believed to make a positive change within the company. While working with Raytheon, Korb joined the Committee for National Security (CNS). During a lunch hour, CNS scheduled a press conference and Mr. Korb made derogatory remarks that were later seen in a news article that went against the company’s wishes. Once headquarters heard about Korb’s statements, they informed him that his job was at risk and offered him......

Words: 1055 - Pages: 5

Rights and Freedoms

...Rights and Freedoms Caffie Moore Grand Canyon University: POS-301 February 12, 2014 The Delcaration of Independence brought about the essential part of our country, the United States of America. The Constitution with the first ten amendments granted a rule of law for a genuine government to achieve those main beliefs. The Bill of Rights guards each individual right as American people. The first ten amendments to the United States Constitution are known as the Bill of Rights. During the debate on the Constitution the bill of rights were added, it was created to defend people against mistreatment by the federal government and provide rights to the people and state, therefore setting boundaries on the power of the government. We as the people were born with certain natural rights and the govenments are shaped to defend the rights of the people, when the government rejects to guard the rights of life, liberty and property we the people have the right to rebel against the system. The first Ten Amendements are rights that are guaranteed to the American citizens and the government can not disobey those rights. The freedom most relevant to me is the Freedom of Speech in the First Amendment. This right protect us an American citizen because we have the right to speak out in any way that we choose and not be punished. People are entitle to their own opinion and can speak at their own free will; this right allows people to speak out about abortion and the government decision.......

Words: 966 - Pages: 4

Rights and Freedoms

...Rights and Freedoms When the founding fathers wrote the Constitution they realized they did not outline the rights of the people. The added the Bill of Rights to ensure that the people knew their rights and so future politicians could not infringe on those rights. The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments ensuring Americans freedom of speech, freedom to protest, freedom to bear arms, and many others. The first amendment is the most popular and one of the most important of the amendments. The first amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Personally the most important part of the first amendment is the freedom of speech. Being able to speak your mind without fear of being prosecuted for it is a true freedom. I have family that came from Cuba; a country where speaking your mind can lead to jail time or death. I know that this is a freedom we take for granted in the United States. The first ten amendments are significant because they are the first but there have been many more amendments that have changed America for the better and some for the worst. The most blood was spilt before the thirteenth amendment was passed and ending slavery for good in the United States. However this did not end discrimination so the government...

Words: 629 - Pages: 3

Rights and Freedoms

...POS 301 Mark Koenig Rights and Freedoms of the First Amendment The United States Constitution gave us the several different rights and freedoms. We as Americans have the right to vote, speak our opinion, and worship freely. The Bill of Rights and Constitution were written over the last several years. The Constitution was written by the founding fathers of this country and is the foundational document of the United States. The First Amendment freedom that regards me the most is religious liberty. The First Amendment guaranteed by the First Amendments of the United States Constitution is the freedom to religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. (Billings, Roberts, Haynes, Chaltain, Glisson, 2008). Religious liberty gives us the ability to go to church on Sunday or pray at our homes. Freedom of speech is in the Bill of Rights stating that we are allowed to speak out and express our opinions without censorship or restraint. We are also having the right to protest for organize for change and for justice. The freedom of press is the right to write newspapers and allow readers to know your opinion on a subject or topic. The freedom of assembly is the right to freedom of association is recognized as a political right, human right, and civil liberty. The freedom of petition is the request that is made to one that is in authority. Some examples of petitions are collecting signatures and sending them to elected representatives, writing or calling elected representatives,......

Words: 791 - Pages: 4

Constitutional Rights

...  Assignment 3: Constitutional Rights Krystle Ward Dr. Angela Smith PAD 525 February 23, 2014 Korb v. Raytheon Korb the Vice President at Raytheon, a large corporation that build equipment for the military, was given permission to join by his employer to join the executive board of the Committee for National Security (CNS), a nonprofit organization dedicated to informing the public about issues of national security and the prevention of nuclear war. Remarks made by Korb at a CNS press conference angered military officials. As a direct result of Korb's statements, Raytheon promptly terminated Korb's employment as a lobbyist in Washington, DC. Korb sued Raytheon in a Massachusetts state court for wrongful termination, citing both the Massachusetts state civil rights statute and the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Raytheon removed the case to Federal District Court in Boston. Korb then amended his complaint to delete all references to the U.S. Constitution (Standler, 2000). Korb was hired to be the corporation's spokesperson, and he spoke against the interests of the corporation. The topic was one of acute concern to Raytheon. Regardless of whether Korb believed himself to be acting privately rather than as a Raytheon employee, and regardless of what Korb actually said, the public perception after the press conference was that a Raytheon lobbyist advocated a reduction in defense spending. Raytheon had a financial stake in not advocating that position. Therefore,...

Words: 1845 - Pages: 8

Constitutional Rights

...that the taking and compensation issues be separated.  DOT contended below, as it does here, that there should be a non-jury bifurcated proceeding allowing it to decide whether to pay compensation or “undo” the taking by restoring Landowners’ property to its previous condition. Reading Judge Few’s order as allowing a jury trial in the compensation phase, we turn to the issue whether such an order is immediately appealable.  If an order deprives a party of a mode of trial to which that party is entitled as a matter of right, the order is immediately appealable and failure to do so forever bars appellate review.  Flagstar Corp. v. Royal Surplus Lines, 341 S.C. 68, 533 S.E.2d 331 (2000); Foggie v. CSX Transp., Inc., 313 S.C. 98, 431 S.E.2d 587 (1993); see also Pelfrey v. Bank of Greer, 270 S.C. 691, 244 S.E.2d 315 (1978) (an order allowing a jury trial is immediately appealable where there is no such entitlement as a matter of right).  DOT asserts there is no right to a jury trial in an inverse condemnation case and therefore Judge Few’s order is immediately appealable. SC Federal trial court decision describing the standard for summary judgment  If on motion under this rule judgment is not rendered upon the whole case or for all the relief asked and a trial is necessary, the court at the hearing of the motion, by examining the pleadings and the evidence before it and by interrogating counsel, shall if practicable ascertain what material facts exist......

Words: 2360 - Pages: 10

Rights and Freedom Assignment

...we should believe. “Freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom. Freedom opens the windows of the soul so that man can discover his most profound beliefs and commune with God.” (Goldford). By allowing for freedom of religion it gives people of the United States the opportunity to decide for themselves what their hearts tell them to believe. While the majority religions are Christian based, there are many different religions and beliefs that are being followed in our country. Our freedoms allow us to make these decisions for ourselves and our family. While it appears that our constitution was written with a Christian world view, the first amendment states that our state or federal government cannot show a preference to one religion or another. We cannot be influenced by government to choose a specific religion. The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten amendments of the Constitution. It was developed to protect individual freedoms. It gives individuals the right to free speech, religion, and assembly. While also protecting against unwarranted search and seizures, arrest without probable cause, self-incrimination, and double jeopardy. The Bill of Rights also gives citizens the right to due process, fair legal proceedings. It gives citizens the right to legal counsel and prompt and reasonable proceedings. Bail cannot be given that is excessive. We are protected against cruel and unusual punishment. The Bill of Rights was set forth to......

Words: 559 - Pages: 3

Constitutional Rights

...CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS Our handbook, written by Kenneth Peck gives us some insight into the constitutional rights associated with criminal justice employees. It covers such areas as freedom of speech, search and seizures, self incrimination, religious practices, sexual misconduct, residency requirements, moonlighting, misuse of firearms, alcohol and drugs and drug testing. The state has a vital interest as an employer in regulating the speech of its employees with reasonable restrictions. The restrictions cannot be overly broad or in a way in which the government action is implied. Agencies may regulate/restrict the political behavior of employees. Without this employees can be pressured by superiors to support certain candidates, political activities or other activities that may impair the effectiveness and efficiency of the organization or them doing their jobs. The Fourth Amendment rights in regards to search and seizure cover the employee when they are off duty or at home just as it applies to everyone else. However, equipment supplied by the organization, such as lockers, desks, computers, patrol cars, uniforms, etc. are not protected by the Fourth Amendment. Even the employees, themselves, during work hours are considered a part of the department’s equipment and the individual may be used in a police lineup if necessary. The right to plead the Fifth Amendment does not necessarily apply to criminal justice employees providing that the officer has been......

Words: 731 - Pages: 3

Constitutional Rights

... Constitutional Rights: Another Angle of Freedom of Speech Maria Ibanez PAD 525 Constitutional and Administrative Law Dr. Glenn L. Starks May 25, 2014 Abstract Traditionally, freedom of speech has been perceived as a fundamental right guaranteed under our federal constitution to express whatever we please, whenever we please and wherever we please. Nevertheless, we must be aware that some speech may be subjected to restrictions and that not all speech is protected. Moreover, the language of the first amendment specifically mentions the prohibition of state laws against abridging freedom of speech. Similarly, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that the government may limit and regulate its content when duly necessary. Constitutional Rights: Another Angle at Freedom of Speech Although the Supreme Court has historically dedicated efforts into chartering the boundaries of freedom of speech, the ones evolving from the First Amendment, its representational approach is still defective (Blocher, 2014). The free exchange of ideas does not seem to completely pass the test of common sense and keeps opening room for personal misinterpretation and misunderstanding over the privileges and limitations of private speech. First Amendment Special Protections The First Amendment special protections were designed to safeguard freedom of speech from state action, and do not concern itself with private expression. In the case of Korb v. Raytheon, the defendant proposed that a federal question......

Words: 1976 - Pages: 8

Rights & Freedoms

...graduating law school he practiced law and specialized in labor and civil liberty cases, issues he would later bring into focus for all of Canada. In 1961, Trudeau was a constitutional law professor at which point he began to consider turning to federal politics. In 1964 Trudeau decided to run for the Liberals and won a federal seat in 1965. He was appointed to the cabinet as Minister of Justice and within a year, he had reformed the divorce laws and liberalized the laws on abortion and homosexuality. He eventually became the Prime Minister of Canada and served as Prime Minister for 15 years. During his term as a cabinet minister and prime minister he accomplished much including the appointment of women as the Speaker of the Senate and House of Commons and Governor General. However his greatest accomplishment occurred towards the end of his political career. Throughout his private and political career Trudeau fought to ensure that the rights and freedoms of Canadians were protected and that Canada remained a strong and independent nation. His civil rights accomplishment were numerous but the major events he is known for included the passing of the Official Languages Act in 1969 and repatriating Canada’s Constitution in 1982 from Britain and the inclusion of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the Constitution. In 1969 Trudeau spearheaded the Official Languages Act, which declared that French and English are the official languages of Canada.......

Words: 690 - Pages: 3

Constitutional Right

...and Moral Leadership Olivier Faye Dr. Mark Pantaleo PAD 515 Sunday, February 5, 2012 What comes to mind when you hear the word leader? Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, John F. Kennedy? According to Webster’s Dictionary, a leader is one who leads. As a leader, you can put ethical values into action and set the example you want followers to live by. You can resist pressures to act unethically just to avoid criticism or achieve short term gains. (Daft, page 167). Leadership is not merely a set of practice with no association with right or wrong. All leadership practice can be used for good or evil and thus have a moral dimension. Leaders choose whether to act form selfishness and greed to diminish others or to behave in ways that serve others and motivate people to expand their potential and as a human being. Moral leadership is about distinguishing right from wrong and doing right, seeking the just, the honest, the good and the right conduct to achieve goals and fulfilling purpose There are a select few individuals who have come variously to be called great or brilliant because they and their accomplishments have forever changed society and the world. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was on those individual. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., (January 15, 1929 - April 4, 1968) would have been 83 on Jan. 15, 2012. Unfortunately his birthday has been turned into a three-day weekend by being recognized as a federal holiday observed on the third Monday of January each year. More......

Words: 998 - Pages: 4

PoinBreak 3D HOU BluRay 3D 1080p | Economic growth in China - 917 Words | Black Clover (TV) Episode 23 English Sub