Innovating for the Bottom of the Pyramid - Case Study

In: Business and Management

Submitted By berivate
Words 846
Pages 4
Innovating for the bottom of the pyramid 1. Why are companies such as Siemens, GE and Procter and Gamble targeting the “bottom of the pyramid”?
These companies are targeting the bottom of the pyramid because this segment represents two-thirds of the world’s population (4 billion people). However, those people live on less than $2 per day and 1.5 billion people have no access to electricity. Companies such as the ones mentioned above have found out that this situation has provided an opportunity to create innovative sources renewable energy. Another reason why they are doing this is because growth in mature markets tends to slow down. Therefore, many global companies are realizing that the ability to serve the needs of the world’s poorest consumers will be critical source of competitive advantage in the near future. These companies see the bottom of the pyramid as a potential market. In fact, they are already developing products and launching products specially designed for this segment. They are segmenting global markets by income and population and targeting millions of poor consumers with innovative products and appropriate positioning strategies. However, they have to understand the importance of skillful global market segmentation and targeting while trying to reach low-income consumers in emerging markets. Rural markets are dispersed and distribution is not well established. One problem is to persuade low-income consumers to change their behaviors by buying new products and integrating them into their lifestyles. These companies have to grasp the value of local research and developing programs in emerging and rural markets.

2. How might an understanding of the characteristics of innovations help marketers succeed in emerging markets?
According to Everett Rogers, there are five major characteristics of innovations, which are factors that affect the…...

Similar Documents

Bottom of the Pyramid

...Schumpeter The bottom of the pyramid Businesses are learning to serve the growing number of hard-up Americans Jun 23rd 2011 | from the print edition MANAGEMENT gurus have rhapsodised about “the fortune at the bottom of the pyramid” in emerging markets ever since C.K. Prahalad popularised the idea in 2006. They have filled books with stories of cut-price Indian hospitals and Chinese firms that make $100 computers. But when it comes to the bottom of the pyramid in the rich world, the gurus lose interest. This is understandable. McDonald's and Walmart do not have the same exotic ring as Aravind Eye Care and Tata Motors. The West's bottom-of-the-pyramid companies are an unglamorous bunch. Many rely on poorly educated shift workers. Some inhabit the nether world of loan sharks and bail bondsmen. But even in one of the world's richest countries the hard-up represent a huge and growing market. The average American household saw its real income decline between 2005 and 2009. Millions of middle-class Americans have been forced to “downshift”, as credit dries up and the costs of college and health care soar. Some 44m Americans live below the official poverty line ($21,954 a year for a family of four). Consumer spending per household fell by 2.8% in 2009, the first time it had fallen since the Bureau of Labour Statistics started gathering data in 1984. This is a challenge to the American dream. But it is also an opportunity for clever companies. Even the poorest Americans are rich......

Words: 1050 - Pages: 5

Case Study: Bottom of the Pyramid

...Annie Kim 1. As a junior member of your company’s committee to explore new markets, you have received a memo from the chairperson telling you to be prepared at the next meeting to discuss key questions that need to be addressed if the company decides to look further into the possibility of marketing to the BOP segment. The ultimate goal of this meeting will be to establish a set of general guidelines to use in developing a market strategy for any one of the company’s products to be marketed to the “aspirational poor.” These guidelines need not be company or product specific at this time. In fact, think of the final guideline as a checklist—a series of questions that a company could use as a start in evaluating the potential of a specific BOP market segment for one of its products. * Who is the BOP? * What is the income level of BOP? * What are some goods BOP save up money for? * What are causes of health concerns? * What is the current distribution method for goods? * What is the current method of transportation? * What is the living situation of the average family? * What is the demographic of the BOP? * What is the break up of their expenditure? * What kind of jobs do they have? * What is the age distribution? 2. Marketing to the BOP raises a number of issues revolving around the social responsibility of marketing efforts. Write a position paper either pro or con on one of the following: a. Is it exploitation for a...

Words: 545 - Pages: 3

Bottom of the Pyramid

...Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid Until recently, the least important market segment has been the most poor, lower-income individuals and families. According to Professor C.K. Prahalad, the “bottom of the pyramid”, also referred to as the BOP, is made up of nearly 4 billion people who survive on $2 a day or less. Making up approximately a quarter of the world’s population, these four billion people hold $14 trillion in purchasing power and this group is growing each year. In the past, this market segment couldn’t afford to purchase most products and were definitely not looking at the latest and greatest technologies. However, with some markets becoming more and more competitive, potential for making more profit from bottom of the pyramid consumers began to grow. Today, more and more stores such as Wal-Mart specifically cater to low-income families, just as Sears Roebuck had. Companies such a Singer offering payment plans for consumers who purchased their sewing machine led the way in marketing to this group. It seems that as time goes on, the BOP seems to have access to more and more higher end products that they once couldn’t afford. While the process of marketing to the BOP has proven to turn a profit, marketers need to keep in mind the challenges that they face in regards to offering advanced technology, financing, distribution, and packaging. One challenge that many companies faced was being able to create technologically advanced products that could be made......

Words: 970 - Pages: 4

Bottom of Pyramid

...November 06, 2006 case 1-428-604 Hindustan Lever at the Base of the Pyramid: Growth for the 21st Century About Hindustan Lever Limited Hindustan Lever Limited began operating in India in 1888 with the distribution of its “Made in England” Sunlight detergent. In 1931, when India was still a British colony, Hindustan Vanaspati Limited was formed Published by GlobaLens, a division of the William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan. Research Assistant Maulin Vakil and Professor Ted London of the University of Michigan developed this case. They thank Vijay Sharma and Rohithari Rajan of Hindustan Lever for their assistance.© 2008, Ted London. Unauthorized reproduction and distribution is an infringement of copyright. Please contact us for permissions: Permissions@GlobaLens.com or 734-615-9553. DO In fact, since 1999 revenues at HLL had remained nearly constant, an outcome stockholders had not welcomed. With this lack of growth, increasing attention was directed to the company’s Millennium Plan an ambitious blueprint outlining the company’s growth strategies for the 21st century. The Millennium Plan was a part of the company’s renewed emphasis on business focus and operational efficiencies. Additionally, a core aspect of the Plan was to identify and nurture businesses of the future. Over 150 new businesses were proposed before the list was narrowed down to nine. These included a foray into drinking water, a plan for network-based marketing (along the...

Words: 9344 - Pages: 38

The Fortune of Bottom of Pyramid

...strategy + business issue 26 The Fortune at the of the SECURITY AND S T R AT E GY Bottom Pyramid by C.K. Prahalad and Stuart L. Hart content strategy & competition Low-income markets present a prodigious opportunity for the world’s wealthiest companies — to seek their fortunes and bring prosperity to the aspiring poor. 2 With the end of the Cold War, the former Soviet Union and its allies, as well as China, India, and Latin America, opened their closed markets to foreign investment in a cascading fashion. Although this significant economic and social transformation has offered vast new growth opportunities for multinational corporations (MNCs), its promise has yet to be realized. First, the prospect of millions of “middle-class” consumers in developing countries, clamoring for products from MNCs, was wildly oversold. To make matters worse, the Asian and Latin American financial crises have greatly diminished the attractiveness of emerging markets. As a consequence, many MNCs worldwide slowed investments and began to rethink risk–reward structures for these markets. This retreat could become even more pronounced in the wake of the terrorist attacks in the United States last September. The lackluster nature of most MNCs’ emergingmarket strategies over the past decade does not change the magnitude of the opportunity, which is in reality much larger than previously thought. The real source of market promise is not the wealthy few in the developing......

Words: 8366 - Pages: 34

Case Study: Bottom of the Pyramid

...CASE 33 Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid Professor C. K. Prahalad’s seminal publication, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, suggests an enormous market at the “bottom of the pyramid” (BOP)—a group of some 4 billion people who subsist on less than $2 a day. By some estimates, these “aspirational poor,” who make up three-fourths of the world’s population, represent $14 trillion in purchasing power, more than Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy, France, and Japan put together. Demographically, it is young and growing at 6 percent a year or more. Traditionally, the poor have not been considered an important market segment. “The poor can’t afford most products”; “they will not accept new technologies”; and “except for the most basic products, they have little or no use for most products sold to higher income market segments”—these are some of the assumptions that have, until recently, caused most multinational firms to pay little or no attention to those at the bottom of the pyramid. Typical market analysis is limited to urban areas, thereby ignoring rural villages where, in markets like India, the majority of the population lives. However, as major markets become more competitive and in some cases saturated—with the resulting ever-thinning profit margins— marketing to the bottom of the pyramid may have real potential and be worthy of exploration. One researcher suggested that American and European businesses should go back and look at their own roots. Sears, Roebuck......

Words: 2767 - Pages: 12

Bottom of the Pyramid

...ESSAY ONE MAKING CONNECTIONS DRAFT Bottom of the pyramid (BOP) refers to refers to the poorest yet largest economic group in the world as it shows on figure 1. This was a term introduced by http://recyclewashington.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/graphic-world-economic-pyramid-web1.gif?w=510 http://recyclewashington.wordpress.com/category/economics/ These income values are based on the purchasing power in US dollar, and the BOP represents the tier 4 which earns less than $1,500 a year per head. This economic group however represents 4 Billion people which is larger than all other groups combined. Countries that can be referred to as BOPs include countries like Niger which has a GNI per capita of $701 http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/NER.html or Afghanistan with a GNI per capita of $1000 http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/AFG.html. There is a high correlation between countries with low GNIs http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/indicators/103606.html and Third world countries http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/third_world.htm therefore we are able to identify similarities amongst them whether cultural, environmental or economic. The Bottom of the pyramid strategy is a modern strategy introduced by Coimbatore Krishnarao Prahalad. He believes that that multinational companies not only can make money selling to the world’s poorest, but also that undertaking such efforts is necessary as a way to close the growing gap between rich and poor countries. Key...

Words: 965 - Pages: 4

The Bottom of the Pyramid

...CASE 33 Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid Professor C. K. Prahalad’s seminal publication, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, suggests an enormous market at the “bottom of the pyramid” (BOP)—a group of some 4 billion people who subsist on less than $2 a day. By some estimates, these “aspirational poor,” who make up three-fourths of the world’s population, represent $14 trillion in purchasing power, more than Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy, France, and Japan put together. Demographically, it is young and growing at 6 percent a year or more. Traditionally, the poor have not been considered an important market segment. “The poor can’t afford most products”; “they will not accept new technologies”; and “except for the most basic products, they have little or no use for most products sold to higher income market segments”—these are some of the assumptions that have, until recently, caused most multinational firms to pay little or no attention to those at the bottom of the pyramid. Typical market analysis is limited to urban areas, thereby ignoring rural villages where, in markets like India, the majority of the population lives. However, as major markets become more competitive and in some cases saturated—with the resulting ever-thinning profit margins— marketing to the bottom of the pyramid may have real potential and be worthy of exploration. One researcher suggested that American and European businesses should go back and look at their own roots. Sears, Roebuck......

Words: 2767 - Pages: 12

Case 3-3 Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid

...000  new customers and is expected to turn a $1.5 million profit next year. CASE 3-3 Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid Professor C. K. Prahalad’s seminal publication, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, suggests an enormous market at the “bottom of the pyramid” (BOP)—a group of some 4 billion people who subsist on less than $2 a day. By some estimates, these “aspirational poor,” who make up three-fourths of the world’s population, represent $14 trillion in purchasing power, more than Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy, France, and Japan put together. Demographically, it is young and growing at 6 percent a year or more. Traditionally, the poor have not been considered an important market segment. “The poor can’t afford most products”; “they will not accept new technologies”; and “except for the most basic products, they have little or no use for most products sold to higher income market segments”—these are some of the assumptions that have, until recently, caused most multinational firms to pay little or no attention to those at the bottom of the pyramid. Typical market analysis is limited to urban areas, thereby ignoring rural villages where, in markets like India, the majority of the population lives. However, as major markets become more competitive and in some cases saturated—with the resulting ever-thinning profit margins— marketing to the bottom of the pyramid may have real potential and be worthy of exploration. One researcher......

Words: 2825 - Pages: 12

Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid

...CASE 3-3 Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid Professor C. K. Prahalad’s seminal publication, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, suggests an enormous market at the “bottom of the pyramid” (BOP)—a group of some 4 billion people who subsist on less than $2 a day. By some estimates, these “aspirational poor,” who make up three-fourths of the world’s population, represent $14 trillion in purchasing power, more than Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy, France, and Japan put together. Demographically, it is young and growing at 6 percent a year or more. Traditionally, the poor have not been considered an important market segment. “The poor can’t afford most products”; “they will not accept new technologies”; and “except for the most basic products, they have little or no use for most products sold to higher income market segments”—these are some of the assumptions that have, until recently, caused most multinational firms to pay little or no attention to those at the bottom of the pyramid. Typical market analysis is limited to urban areas, thereby ignoring rural villages where, in markets like India, the majority of the population lives. However, as major markets become more competitive and in some cases saturated—with the resulting ever-thinning profit margins— marketing to the bottom of the pyramid may have real potential and be worthy of exploration. One researcher suggested that American and European businesses should go back and look at their own......

Words: 2796 - Pages: 12

Bottom of the Pyramid

...Local Entrepreneurs over MNCs Multinational companies are not the answer to the situation of the people at the Bottom of the Pyramid, MNCs efforts cannot handle the world’s poor. It is the small and local entrepreneurs that will make a greater impact on alleviating poverty. Aneel Karnani stated in Misfortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, “The BOP proposition calls for price reductions of over 90%”. Let us be realistic here it is seemingly impossible to reduce the price that much and do you think MNCs would still consider selling products 90% cheaper than usual without changing its quality. It is safe to say that MNCs targeting the consumers at the BOP is a very ambitious and relatively impossible task. The BOP propositions that selling their products at smaller packages will help the poor save money and afford their so called “affordable and cheaper” products but the truth is if we look at big picture as Aneel Karnani have said that “This does create value for the poor, and can thus lead to increased consumption. But it does not increase ‘affordability’, which is a function of a per unit price. A customer might be ‘fooled’ into thinking a smaller package is more affordable. In short this just helps them afford the said product but the long term effect is that the MNCs is the only one who benefits on this approach of selling in the BOP, not to mention its negative environmental effects. Lastly, the MNCs are not the best candidate in leading in this initiative in......

Words: 394 - Pages: 2

Bottom of the Pyramid

...CASE 33 Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid Professor C. K. Prahalad’s seminal publication, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, suggests an enormous market at the “bottom of the pyramid” (BOP)—a group of some 4 billion people who subsist on less than $2 a day. By some estimates, these “aspirational poor,” who make up three-fourths of the world’s population, represent $14 trillion in purchasing power, more than Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy, France, and Japan put together. Demographically, it is young and growing at 6 percent a year or more. Traditionally, the poor have not been considered an important market segment. “The poor can’t afford most products”; “they will not accept new technologies”; and “except for the most basic products, they have little or no use for most products sold to higher income market segments”—these are some of the assumptions that have, until recently, caused most multinational firms to pay little or no attention to those at the bottom of the pyramid. Typical market analysis is limited to urban areas, thereby ignoring rural villages where, in markets like India, the majority of the population lives. However, as major markets become more competitive and in some cases saturated—with the resulting ever-thinning profit margins— marketing to the bottom of the pyramid may have real potential and be worthy of exploration. One researcher suggested that American and European businesses should go back and look at their own roots...

Words: 2797 - Pages: 12

Mini Case: Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid

...Mini-Case 3: Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid 1. Establish a set of guidelines a. How will the company emphasize the value of their product? i. Low-income consumers have less discretion when it comes to what they can spend their funds on so it is important to promote a product by emphasizing its long term value and cost savings compared to a competitor’s product. b. What are the best media avenues for reaching low-income consumers? ii. Many low-income consumers rely on their mobile devices as their primary connection to the internet in order to save money that would be spent on home internet service. It would be beneficial to create an excellent mobile experience that would entice them to view and buy the products along with other marketing channels. c. How frequently will the product be advertised? iii. Low-income consumers tend to buy things only on an as–needed basis. So, would it be best to advertise frequently? Consider that they also do not usually buy in bulk. d. Where will the product be targeted? iv. Low-income consumers generally live in less than spacious neighborhoods. With the right kind of ad, those that live in neighborhoods within a close proximity to a store carrying the product would be a great place to start because word of mouth may spread easily and since they only shop as-needed the ad would reach them at just the right times. 2. Is it exploitation for a company to......

Words: 503 - Pages: 3

Bottom of the Pyramid

...CANSU DALKILIC MGMT 311 RESPONSE PAPER 2 32936 There is an ongoing debate on if it is possible to integrate dominant economies with the bottom of the pyramid which are the 4 billion people who have less than 2$ per day. It occurs questions like if it is possible for companies to compete by serving people who counted as bottom pyramid? Is it possible for those poor people to survive by being consumers of MNCs? Prahalad believes that it is a win win for both MNCs and tier 4 (bottom of the pyramid). In other words, he believes that it is possible to sell high quality products to mass number of poor people. Both Prahalad and Karnani want to find solution to alleviate poverty, but they have different approaches to this issue. Prahalad states that we should consider poors as consumers. In contrast to Prahalad, Karnani thinks that rather than viewing the poor primarily as consumers, an alternative approach is to focus on the poor as producers and to emphasize buying from the poor. The only way to alleviate poverty is to raise real income of the poor. Karnani quotes the example of Nirma, a demonstrably inferior product to some of the alternative detergents on the market, such as Surf. It was hard on the skin, and could sometimes cause blisters. And yet it retailed at a third of the price of its competitors, and achieved majority market share from consumers for whom the trade off between price and quality was one that they were happy to make. He concludes: "Insisting on not......

Words: 1147 - Pages: 5

Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid

...Case Study-Marketing to the bottom of the pyramid 1) Bottom of the pyramid refers to the largest but poorest group that consists of 2.5 billion people who live on less than $2.50 a day. This group of people has relatively different needs as compared to the urban society due to the fact that their living environment is very different from the big urban cities. Culture of the target market the company is heading into should be one factor that the company should look into. The demographics of the population like their age groups, employment rate, purchasing power and language spoken are factors that should be discussed. We must understand what their culture values and what they detest and avoid so that the product can be better adapted to their preferences. The external environment must also be analysed and evaluated to better understand the environment surrounding the target market. This can be analysed through the PESTEL factors which consists of namely, political, economic, socio-cultural, technological, environmental and legal. This will tell us about the business laws in the country, what is appropriate for sale and what is not. The economy of the country whether it is stable or fluctuates drastically as transaction will be done in a different currency so rate of currency fluctuation is important. The population demographics, the environmental issues the country counters against and lastly the kind of technology they have in the country. This will tell the company......

Words: 1012 - Pages: 5

Jumanji: Trò Chơi Kỳ ẢoJumanji: Welcome To The Jungle (2017) Full HD | Bungo Stray Dogs #9 - Vol. 9 December 12, 2018 | Thailand