Let1 Task 3

In: Business and Management

Submitted By tayrudy87
Words 832
Pages 4
LET1 Task 3

Managers in an organization use their power in ways that their employees can achieve goals of the company. There are five bases of power that are broke into two groups: formal and personal power. There is also the power of dependency in which Employee B depends on Employee A if he/she has goals and requirements that Employee A can complete. Dependency increases when the controlled resources are important, short in supply or non-substitutable. * Formal Power group
Coercive- the concept that an employee is forced to do something he/she doesn’t want to do. This type of power is usually unhealthy and makes the employee feel dissatisfied at work. These types of leaders use threats if the employee doesn’t do what they are told, such as firing or demoting them. The main goal of coercion is compliance, this source of power can often lead to problems and in many cases it involves abuse. Employee 1 has to work beyond the 40 hours a week so he/she can get a good rating on the evaluation so he/she can get that bonus to go on vacation. If not for the bonus, he/she wouldn’t be able to afford the vacation, so that manager has some sort of control over the employee.
Reward- when a leader uses the ability to award another person things that person desires or to remove or decrease things the person does not desire. The popular forms of this are raises, promotions and just simply stating compliments. The employee will be more willing to do something if they know they are getting something for it. Employee 1 is an example of this group, if he/she works more than 40 hours in one week, most likely will get a bonus at the end of the year.
Legitimate- is the leader’s ability to administer to another certain feelings of obligation or the notion of responsibility. Employees usually obey a person just because of their title or position, this power can be lost if the…...

Similar Documents

Let1 Task 3

...LET1 Task 3 (317.1.5.10) Organizational Behavior& Leadership Power and Politics Some would say that power and greed are two sides of the same coin. In this essay we will review the use and type of power in the scenario provided. We will also define the basic types of power. Five bases of power demonstrated Legitimate power (Formal): Is derived from a person’s position in an organization. A person’s level of legitimate power is directly linked to their ability to coerce or reward others. Legitimate power is demonstrated in two areas within this scenario. First, within the CEO corporate mission statement, we see it again in the CEO’s overall hiring practices. Legitimate power was also used in conjunction with reward power by the marketing manager. The marketing manager;s position gives them the legitimate power to influence their employees’ rewards. Coercive power: A person’s ability to impact negative results from failing to comply. Within the scenario, coercive power was demonstrated by the certified public accountant CPA, (employee number two). As the only employee with the skill to do the job and the task having linked to company regularity requirements, employee number two used coercive power to move to a four day work week. Reward power (opposite of coercive power): positive benefits; person’s ability to distribute rewards that others people or groups may view as valuable. This can be financial or nonfinancial. Reward power is demonstrated within the scenario...

Words: 651 - Pages: 3

Let1 Task 3

...Organizational Behavior & Leadership Five Bases of Power – Task 3 Within an organization leaders and managers use their power in order for their employees toreach the organization’s goals. There are five bases of power which can be broken down intotwo groups: formal power and personal power. Along with the five bases of power there is alsothe power of dependency which states that Employee B depends on Employee A if Employee Bhas goals and needs that Employee A can fulfill. Dependency can be increased when theresources that are being controlled are important, scarce and non-substitutable. Formal Power A formal power is based on an employee’s position within the organization.  Coercive Power – A coercive power requires forcing an employee to do something thatthey do no want to do. This power can cause an unhealthy behavior and employeedissatisfaction in the workplace. The most common threat is the threat of being demotedor fired. Although the most common threats are being demoted or fired the marketingmanager also uses a coercive power when they tell the employees that their yearlyevaluation and bonus can be effected if they do not work over the required 40-hour work week. Employee 1 needs to work the extra hours so that they can achieve the yearly bonus and take a vacation that would not be affordable without the end of the year bonus. Reward Power – A reward power is when the leader uses their ability to administer or remove something that an employee desires.......

Words: 727 - Pages: 3

Let1 Task 3

...employees that need it can be a form of coercive power. The supervisor of employee 1 is using coercive power to get his employees to work extra hours by reminding them that a good evaluation depends on it. 2. Reward power- Reward power keeps employees in check based on the ability to give rewards that employees see as valuable. These rewards can be of the financial variety-controlling salary, giving bonuses, etc- or the nonfinancial kind-giving recognition, interesting work projects, promotions, better work shifts, etc. In the given scenario, the marketing manager of employee 1 uses reward power. He encourages his employees to work more than 40 hours a week by reminding them that they need a favorable evaluation to get the yearly bonus. 3. Legitimate power- Legitimate power refers to the power one receives because of their position in the formal hierarchy of the organization. Employees listen to a person with legitimate power because of their title and position within the organization. In the given scenario, both the marketing manager of employee 1 and the supervisor of employee 2 have legitimate power. Employees 1’s supervisor uses his, along with reward power, to make employees work longer hours. Employee 2’s supervisor used theirs to grant them a shorter work week and keep everyone else in the department working five days a week. Personal Power 4. Expert Power-Expert power is based on special skill sets and knowledge. As jobs become more and more specialized, we will......

Words: 701 - Pages: 3

Let1 Task 1

...LET1 Task 1 A. The three components of Expectancy Theory are the Effort-performance relationship, the Performance-reward relationship and the Rewards-personal goals relationship. (Robbins, Judge, 2013) The effort-performance relationship says that the individual perceives the amount of effort exerted will result in a higher performance achieved. If the skill level or ability of the individual is low (or perceived as low), the performance may not be as high as expected. The employee may need additional training or knowledge to be more efficient in his position to reach the desired performance level. The performance-reward relationship says that the individual can be rewarded in other ways besides performance, such as seniority, being a ‘team player’ or other benchmark. This can lead to lower performance as the rewards for the effort exerted are not as beneficial to the individual. By giving an employee performance based rewards, their productivity is increased. The rewards-personal goals relationship says that the individual weighs the rewards in regards to their personal goals. If an individual is looking for a pay raise, but rather gets a few words of praise and a ‘ap on the back’, it might be less motivating than a raise or a promotion. By having a clear rewards system and path, employees will be motivated to obtain those rewards through higher performance. B. The company in the given scenario could improve the motivation of doing several things. First,......

Words: 498 - Pages: 2

Let1 Task 1

...LET1 Task 1 317.1.1-06 THE EXPECTANCY THEORY OF MOTIVATION The expectancy theory of motivation refers to the belief that an employee will perform better if there is a reward for this performance and if this reward is lucrative to the employee. The three key components of the expectancy theory of motivation are the relationships of effort to performance, performance to reward, and rewards to personal goals. The effort to performance relationship refers to the thought that putting forth a certain amount of effort will result in a desired performance. An example of this would be would be an employee working harder than everyone else to be the highest producer in the company. The performance to reward relationship refers to the belief that performing at a certain level will lead to a reward for this performance. An example of this would be a bonus for reaching a certain production quota, or an increase commission percentage for reaching a certain sales level. In the given scenario, the company’s employees have no reason to be motivated. The employees rarely receive a bonus for meeting production goals and when they do, the reward is so small that it is not worth their while to put forth the extra effort. They would rather take longer because a few hours of overtime pay is more than the production bonus. Workers are also very rarely penalized for slow production. I would apply the expectancy theory of motivation in the given scenario in the......

Words: 438 - Pages: 2

Let1 Task 1

...| LET1 Task 1 (317.1.1-06) Behavioral Influences | | First Name Last Name Student ID# 00000000 My Mentor: First Name Last Name Program and Start Date: Bus.Mgmt.- IT 01/01/01 | | 12/30/2011 | Apply the concepts of the expectancy theory of motivation as an approach to improving performance in a given workplace situation. | In today’s workforce there are many reasons why individuals get up every day and go to work. For most it is because they have bills to pay and thus their motivation to work is for the outcome of a paycheck. That is true for most, but how does motivation apply to an individual once they are at work and must perform their daily duties? Whether that is bolting doors on cars in an assembly line or web developers working on the next big internet company, these individuals’ performances are based on their expectations of something in return. Some may work harder or more efficiently than others for many reasons. How does a manager, supervisor or foreman improve this behavior in order to achieve optimal production? The Expectancy Theory of Motivation was first conceived by Victor Vroom at Yale University in 1964. This theory explains the behavioral process of why individuals choose one behavioral option over another. It also explains how they make decisions to achieve the end they value. Vroom introduces three variables within the expectancy theory which are valence (V), expectancy (E) and instrumentality (I). The three elements are......

Words: 841 - Pages: 4

Let1 Task 3

...LET1 Task 3 The five bases of power are defined as the following. Legitimate power is the ability to influence the behavior of another person based on the title or position held in an organization or hierarchy. Reward power is the ability to influence the behavior of another person based on giving rewards or benefits that others view as desirable or valuable. Coercive power is the ability to influence the behavior of another person based on being able to harm or punish the person. Expert power is the ability to influence the behavior of another person based on knowledge or qualifications held that another person does not have. Referent power is the ability to influence the behavior of another person based on having a desirable character or other personal traits. In the given scenario the Legitimate Power is described in the relationship between the Marketing Manager and Employee 1. The Marketing Manager is the boss of the department that Employee 1 is a part of. The Market Manager also has Reward and Coercive Power over Employee 1. Employee 1 performs his job and stays for longer than 40 hours per week in order to receive a high performance rating from the Marketing Manager. The high performance rating allows Employee 1 to receive a bonus. The Marketing Manager also has Coercive Power in the relationship with Employee 1. If Employee 1 does not receive the bonus, Employee 1 will not be able to afford the vacation that Employee 1 wishes to take. In the given scenario......

Words: 610 - Pages: 3

Let1 Task 1

...components of the Expectancy Theory 1. Effort-performance relationship (Expectancy) – The employee’s belief that their effort will result in the attainment of desired performance goals. (Scholl, 2012) An example would be “if I make more sales calls, will I make more sales?” (Scholl, 2012) 2. Performance-reward relationship (Instrumentality) – The employee’s belief that if they perform to expectations, they will receive a greater award. (Scholl, 2012) For example “if I make more sales will I get a bonus? A greater commission?” (Scholl, 2012) 3. Rewards-personal goals relationship (Valance) – The value the employee places on rewards. (Scholl, 2012) For example “Do I want a bigger raise?” “Is it worth the extra effort?” (Scholl, 2012) The expectancy theory helps management understand how employees make decisions amongst various alternatives. It also explains why they aren’t motivated to perform certain task and only perform at the minimum expected level. B. Expectancy Theory Applied Company A’s has introduced a new production process for a line of branded professional audio products. The process was intended to help employees meet high production standards and goals but employees are not meeting company expectations. The Expectancy Theory Relationship model can be used to help improve employee performance. Effort-performance relationship (Expectancy) – Employees do not believe their efforts will result in meeting production standards......

Words: 590 - Pages: 3

Let1-Task 2

...Caroline Rador Western Governors University LET1-Task 2 Organizational Behavior & Leadership Executive A the CEO of the company according to the given profile exhibits qualities associated with a level five leader. Level 5 leader’s are self motivated and have a clear defined mission; take the current state of a company and create a financially, successful and sustainable organization his own needs are seen as secondary. Prior to Executive A becoming the CEO the company was losing millions each year due to low stock value. During the second quarter after taking the position as CEO the company posted a profit as the value of the company stock increased by 128% as stated in the given and level 5 leadership. A level 5 leader is confident in their abilities to identify and surround themselves with the right people and then delegate. These leaders are not interested in monopolizing the work but in molding people who are contributors to the success of the company. Executive A takes pride in developing strong leaders which are qualities of a Level 5 leader. This leader is humble and does not have the need to be noticed or recognized for his/hers sizeable contributions to the company, the mere fact that the company is successful is enough. Executive A in the given has been credited and praised by the media for the financial growth and success of the company but is humble and often gives credit to the team leaders of the company, these are qualities as defined of a level 5......

Words: 1143 - Pages: 5

Let1 Task 3

...component of the theory, expectancy behavior, is built by process that an individual undergoes to make choices. This theory is used by leadership and managers to understand how individuals are motivated and how they will respond to rewards closely tied to the task given. This is proposal is understood to be an individual’s understanding of how their efforts lead to a given performance level. Identified in the theory is the belief that more effort put into a task or objective leads to better performance. Therefore, effort leads to performance or (EP). This is closely tied to the individual’s belief that they can perform a given task (self-efficacy), whether they believe the task is obtainable, and the individual can control the goal or performance. The theory highlights the need for the organization to relate rewards directly to performance and ensure the rewards provided are deserved and wanted by the individuals. If the result of a strong effort is a good or exceptional performance the result of a good performance should be the given outcome, (P O). The outcome should be a reward tied closely to the task and performance. A reward that is tied significantly to the performance will motivate the effort to accomplish that task and individuals efforts. Another key component of the theory is valence. This refers to how much value the individual places on the reward. V [R]. The reward should be tied to the outcome, with a perceived value by the individuals, or performance will not......

Words: 733 - Pages: 3

Let1 Task 4

...LET1 Task 4 Christopher Thomas, 215442 WGU Business Management Program A. In the given scenario, the company’s evaluation contains three known evaluation criteria: Friendliness, neatness of workspace, and attitude; and the manager is to rate the employee in these categories. While the complete evaluation form is not available, based on the known information, there are concerns present about the current form being used. First, from what is known, there is no evaluation criteria that relate to the engineer’s core/technical job responsibilities. The engineer is stated to be bright and detail-oriented in the scenario, he has suggested process changes that have resulted in significant savings to the company, and the criteria do not provide the opportunity to show this. While a certain level of attitude, co-worker interaction or-the-like should be measured for a well-rounded evaluation, these should not be the primary rating factors because they are the furthest removed from actual job performance. Next, the rating scale used appears to be clearly subjective and without any commentary or goals. This will leave a lack of context in rating categories for useful discussion when delivering the evaluation and could definitely lead to misunderstanding by the employee. This was also indicated that the last review session ending poorly and the engineer having a lack of confidence in the company’s review process. Lastly, it is apparent that the sole evaluation is based on the......

Words: 1592 - Pages: 7

Let1 Task 1

...LET1 – Task 1 26 September 2015 The Expectancy Theory of Motivation The Expectancy Theory of Motivation (hereafter “The Expectancy Theory”) is theory that states: “the strength of a tendency to act in a certain way depends on the strength of an expectation that the act will be followed by a given outcome and on the attractiveness of that outcome to the individual.” (Robbins & Judge, 2012) The theory is among the most widely accepted theories relating to motivation. (QuickMBA, 1999-2010) The Expectancy Theory suggests that individuals choose a particular course of action after they have – often subconsciously – evaluated three critical components of the theory. * Expectancy: the relationship between an individual’s effort and her performance (or the effort-performance relationship). If an employee believes her additional effort will be recognized in a future performance evaluation, she may be more likely to exert more effort in her work. * Instrumentality: the belief that an individual’s performance will result in a reward for that performance (or the performance-reward relationship). If an employee works for an organization that rewards employees with salary increases or promotion based upon positive performance evaluations, the employee may feel justified in the additional effort he has exerted to receive the positive evaluation. However, if the organization only offers such rewards based upon employee tenure or to employees who pander to their boss’......

Words: 747 - Pages: 3

Let1 Task 2

...LaTonya Walker LET1 Task 2 Organizational Leadership Styles In the Scenario described concerning the printing corporation that is expanding. There are 3 different executives described and each of their leadership styles are detailed and discussed. It appears that the background of the corporation is that it values its customers while creating a quality product that is needed. According to the description the company has done this by using team work and creativity, which are both great methods for an organization to excel in the corporate world. In addition to having a great creative business model, the company also has executives that are tasked with leading the employees to increase the market share of the company. In doing this there are three executives and three distinct leadership styles that are used by each executive. The first executive, Executive A, has been credited with much of the companies success over the years. He has been credited as taking the company to the “next” level so to speak, due to the fact that the market share has risen by 128% under his authority, and other successes have been accredited to him as well. It appears as though Executive A is a “Level 5 leader“ , these leaders are regularly demonstrate humility while still having determination and intense professional will. In addition to being humble and determined , level 5 leaders self confident and do not mind setting up successors’ for their own success. They have “unwavering......

Words: 1078 - Pages: 5

Let1 Task 3

...Organizational Behavior & LeadershipFive Bases of Power – Task 3Tammy LydeenWestern Governors UniversityDecember 17, 2011  Within an organization leaders and managers use their power in order for their employees toreach the organization’s goals. There are five bases of power which can be broken down intotwo groups: formal power and personal power. Along with the five bases of power there is alsothe power of dependency which states that Employee B depends on Employee A if Employee Bhas goals and needs that Employee A can fulfill. Dependency can be increased when theresources that are being controlled are important, scarce and non-substitutable. Formal Power A formal power is based on an employee’s position within the organization.  Coercive Power – A coercive power requires forcing an employee to do something thatthey do no want to do. This power can cause an unhealthy behavior and employeedissatisfaction in the workplace. The most common threat is the threat of being demotedor fired. Although the most common threats are being demoted or fired the marketingmanager also uses a coercive power when they tell the employees that their yearlyevaluation and bonus can be effected if they do not work over the required 40-hour work week. Employee 1 needs to work the extra hours so that they can achieve the yearly bonus and take a vacation that would not be affordable without the end of the year bonus.  Reward Power – A reward power is when the leader uses their ability to......

Words: 1397 - Pages: 6

Let1 Task 317.1.1-06

...Expectancy Theory Of Motivation Juan Fernandez LET1 Task 317.1.1-06 The theory focuses on three relationships: effort-performance, performance-reward, and rewards-personal goals. effort-performance states that an individual displaying a certain amount of effort will lead to a successful performance. performance-reward states that the individual believes that performing at a certain level will lead to some sort of benefit. rewards-personal goals states that is the degree which the organization or persons satisfy the needs or wants of the individual. This theory is based on the individual’s motivation. Either they are motivated to perform at a high level by effort, performance or reward by reason of expectance. i.e salary increase, bonus. Often this is the most challenging situation of an organization. The key is to find out what motivates the employee. By employing this theory we can begin our organizational success in developing a solution that will work for the type of industry and employees we have. In the situation that we are presented with we have a company scenario of professional audio products. That provides the highest quality in the industry. In addition we are also tasked with evaluating the scenario further to provide high production standards. Immediately we can assume that the company is a manufacturing company that requires jobs of various kinds. The one key factor that we can ascertain is that the job is arduous and repetitive. This type of work......

Words: 508 - Pages: 3

PREMIUM Lederbänder rund Lederband - Ø 1 / 1,5 / 2 / 2,5 / 3 / 4 / 5 mm | Chap 117 2018-08-26 02:10:01 | Ch.73 : White Day Capriccio