M&S vs Zara

In: Business and Management

Submitted By javimartinez86
Words 1458
Pages 6
“Marks & Spencer and Zara: Process competition in the textile apparel industry”

Javier Martínez Fernández de Valderrama

Introducción.
En este caso estudiamos a dos compañías, Mark & Spencer y Inditex S.A., pertenecientes al sector de la industria textil. Durante el caso se examinan las cadenas de suministros de M&S y de Zara, marca insignia de Inditex.
M&S es un compañía fundada en 1884 en Inglaterra, además de ser una de las empresas textiles líder en Uk, se dedica también a la distribución de comida y muebles. Por otro lado Inditex es una empresa española propietaria de la marca Zara, la cual abrió su primera en 1975 y que ha logrado un crecimiento y expansión internacional mucho más rápido que el de sus competidores.
Voy a proceder a responder a las preguntas correspondientes a este caso.

1-- ¿Qué es innovador en Zara?

Son muchas las características que hacen sobresalir a Zara como una empresa innovadora dentro del mundo de la moda puesto que ha roto con todos los moldes anteriores y a definido una nueva forma de jugar.
La palabra que diferencia a Zara de sus competidores desde sus orígenes es la VELOCIDAD (velocidad de crecimiento, expansión, cambio, adaptación…) todo ello conseguido gracias a una magnifica gestión de la cadena de suministros.
La cadena de suministros de Zara es una de las más flexibles dentro del sector, lo que le permite hacer cosas que para los competidores sería imposible. Como ser capaz de lanzar entre 12 y 16 colecciones al año, que implica cambiar el 70% de las existencias de sus tiendas cada dos semanas, lo que conseguía promover la novedad, llegando incluso a cambiar las aptitudes de compra de sus clientes, prefiriendo estos realizar compras más pequeñas y de forma más periódica que a la inversa.
Esta flexibilidad le permite hacer modificaciones casi constantes en sus colecciones en función a…...

Similar Documents

M&S vs John Lewis

...Mark and Spencer vs John Lewis Partnership Contents Introduction 2 Mark and Spencer: 2 Competitors: 3 John Lewis Partnership 4 Factors affecting financial Performance: 5 Analysis of Data Available 6 Revenue and Growth: 6 Profitability Ratios: 6 Gross Profit: 7 ROCE: 7 Net Profit Margin 8 Net Asset Turnover 8 EBITDA/Capital employed 9 Activity Ratios 9 Debtor days 9 Creditor days 10 Stock days 10 Cash Conversation Cycle 11 Sales/net current assets 12 Liquidity ratios 13 Current Ratio 13 Quick Ratio 13 Gearing Ratios 13 Capital Gear Ratio 13 Debt/Equity Ratio 14 Interest cover and interest gearing 14 Investor ratios 14 Return on equity 14 Dividend per share 14 Earnings per share 15 Dividend cover 15 Price/earnings ratio 15 Dividend yield 15 Earnings yield 15 Appendix: 18 Key Facts 19 Introduction Mark and Spencer: History: The foundation of Marks and Spencer plc was laid when Michael Marks, a small retailer, entered into a partnership with Tom Spencer, who was a cashier at a wholesale company, in 1894. In 1901, they acquired a warehouse in Manchester and in 1904, acquired retail premises in Leeds. In 1914, when the company was being run by their successors, Marks & Spencer bought the Penny Bazaar Company in London. In 1920, they adopted a policy change, and instead of buying from wholesalers started buying directly from manufacturers. In 1926, they started selling textiles, and in 1930 opened their flagship store at Marble Arch in......

Words: 3419 - Pages: 14

A Case Study on H&M & Zara

...Extreme Business-Models in the Clothing Industry - A Case Study of H&M and ZARA Kristianstad University The Department of Business Studies FE6130 Bachelor Dissertation International Business Program December 2007 Tutors: Håkan Phil Timurs Umans Authours: Susanne Göransson Angelica Jönsson Michaela Persson Abstract In the clothing industry firms compete successfully by applying different businessmodels. H&M and ZARA are two extremes in the clothing industry. H&M’s business-model mainly focuses on outsourcing and ZARA’s business-model mainly focuses on in-house production. The problem is that the existing theories alone cannot explain why two firms competing in the same environment under the same conditions choose different business-models. The purpose of this dissertation is to further expand the idea of why the two clothing firms H&M and ZARA chose different business-models. Our set of Complementarities for H&M and ZARA are based on the information derived from studying theories, the EU clothing industry and the two firms. Finally, Complementarities were analysed by conducting interviews. Our Complementarities partly explain why H&M and ZARA chose different business-models. However, our analysis is applicable for H&M and ZARA since the Complementarities are based on characteristics found in these two firms. The value of Complementarities can be used by other firms if they find their specific characteristics. Keywords: business-models, internalization,......

Words: 24185 - Pages: 97

The Management of M&S

...success. According to Wallop (2012) the company has been the most important British clothing retailer for decades, and also the first retailer in the UK to publish annual profits of £ 1bn. Lately Marks and Spencer has undergone a difficult period. The latest management changes have once again disrupted stability. In July 2012, M&S announced widespread changes across the company, including a new head of general merchandise, style director and a new head of food. A number of external and internal factors explain these changes. External Factors Consumer spending & Competition External factors can be described as things affecting the company beyond its control. Firstly, the retail industry in which M&S operates has weakened as a result of low consumer spending. Research by Ernst & Young (2012) suggests growth in consumer demand in 2012/2013 will be only half the level expected 12 months ago. According to Iqbal and Sharma (2012), spending power of consumers has resulted in aggressive competition among retailers. Retail expert Nick Bubb (2012) claims ‘it is hard for M&S to keep moving forward, with so many eager rivals, from Primark, to Zara, from Debenhams to ASOS’. Management must be seen as reacting to these external factors. This dynamic business environment requires management to align internal interdependencies to the external environment to achieve organizational goals effectively (Iqbal and Sharma, 2012). Sales Decreasing In recent years sales......

Words: 1312 - Pages: 6

Company Analysis -M&S

...2012) This essay will carry out a company analysis by firstly presenting the key  development of M&S and then a SWOT analysis. Finally, several recommendations  will be made.   Key development M&S was found in 1894 by Michael Marks and Tom Spencer in Leeds. Due to innovative management approaches and quality products, the company expanded quickly and became a public limited company in 1926. By the 1980s, it had been the largest retailer in Britain with more than 260 stores. However, by 1990s, the company had been facing fierce competition, and also its market share in clothing and food dropped dramatically. Moreover, its rigid and out-of-touch management brought M&S into a dangerous situation by the end of 1990s. Its share price tumbled by 4 times from over £0.800 to £0.2 per share in the period between 1998 and 2002. (Yahoo! Finance, 2012) Strengths After experiencing a difficult time, M&S remains as one of the largest clothing retailers in the UK with more than 10% market share in both womenswear and menswear. (Marks & Spencer Group 2012) This strong customer base may be brought buy its superior in-store services and quality clothing. According to the Institute of Customer Service (2011), M&S ranked second for UK Customer Satisfaction Index in non-food retail sector. This result showed that M&S is capable of building customer loyalty through successful brand building strategy. On the other hand, the food business of M&S has a growth of almost 4% by offering......

Words: 1305 - Pages: 6

Globalization, Zara and H&M

...the effect of globalization will be studied is the garment industry, and the two companies which we will study in this regard are Zara and H&M. All the top garment industries notability Zara and H&M are doing a fine job in the garments industry as they have adopted well-defined quality standards. There is a diverse research made on the garments and fabric business as they do change with respect to the trends and fashion. Both H&M and Zara are strategically safe players and they have all what it takes to be the front runner in the market. Their stores are in the different areas of the world and most specifically in the main and posh markets. Globalization brings about your extension associated with overseas ethnical, financial, along with political actions (Boudreaux, 2008). As folks, concepts, understanding, along with merchandise proceed more readily around the globe, your experiences of men and women worldwide be related. Demographics, Trends, Technology, Risk Management and Quality regarding these two chosen companies will be discussed further on. Considering all these factors, we will analyze its impact on clothing industry and will see how globalization affects the industry and these two companies. Then the conclusion will be presented at the end concluding the impact of globalization on the clothing industry as well as on Zara and H&M. Demographics Garments industry is also related to a fact that they are produced where they are required by the......

Words: 2684 - Pages: 11

M&S Case Study

...Quality for Money, Fashionable. Parents used to shop there - historical. Value proposition: Traditional department store. Value achieved by technologists, selectrs to design y dedicatd suppliers. all sold under same brand. network of well located stores. powerfull functional group - food clothes. fabric with japanese houses to try o work towards easy care fabrics with customers in mind. Fashion drove mns in 90s. industry influences customer choice. Rsetless - ho can we improve, how can we move forward, what can we do better, how can we innovate. Brand recognition. M&S 1. Value proposition and how was it provided? 2. What went wrong? Not tackling fundamental issues which were building up. Didnt lose many customers but lost touch with them. Over stock problem which led to heavy discounting, and didnt learn lesson as same thing happened again. Firm was pretending that everything was ok and short term issue for too long which later came as a suprise when dividends were cut. Competitors moved off shore, cheaper products of same quality and later even better quality. MNS had to take detail out of their product. Had to get Buying right as otherwise company couldnt recover. Suppliers tried to help as they were moving offshore but MNS didnt react fast enough. Didndt have fantastic product anymore. Ignored innovation in food. Lost direct command over the supply chain. 3. What is your assessment of Luc's approach? Took advantage of people feeling...

Words: 2613 - Pages: 11

Zara & H&M

...Table of Content 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction & History of Zara 3. Introduction & History of H&M 4. Products Offered By Zara & H&M 5. Marketing and Communication Strategy of Zara 6. Marketing and Communication Strategy of H& M 7. SWOT Analysis: Zara 8. SWOT Analysis: H&M 9. Conclusion Executive Summary This report will examine and make comparison of the communication strategy between two leading and established fashion brands, Zara & H&M. Through close study of each of their communication strategy we can understand the reasons behind their success in the current dynamic and competitive market. In the Hong Kong market where competition thrives and those that don’t adapt to the ever changing environment gets abandoned, we can understand how Zara & H&M has established as a ‘fast fashion’ boutique chain in this densely populated city. A communication strategy helps to develop brand awareness and product information dissemination [1]. The communication strategy can also help to retain the brand’s current customer base and more effectively reach out to a broader target audience. Introduction & History of Zara Zara is a spanish brand of clothing and accessories retailer based in Arteixo, Galicia, and founded in 1975 by Amancio Ortefa and Rosalia Mera. It is the flagship chain store of the Inditex group. Inditex group is the world's largest apparel retailer, the fashion group also......

Words: 2235 - Pages: 9

M&S Hr Analyses

...Contents 1.Introduction 2 2.The Situation 3 2.1 Background of M&S 3 2.2 A Fiercely Competitive Clothing Market of M&S 3 2.3 The Rationale: Why does HRM Contribute to Increasing Competitiveness? 4 3 Analysis of Current Situation 5 4. Respond to the HRM Weakness 9 5. Evaluation on HRM Approach Implemented by M&S 10 6. Conclusion 11 References 12 1.Introduction In recent business environment, competition has become a core issue due to its crucial impacts on company development in terms of market and profits. This dissertation will introduce proper and effective strategies to overcome the problems so that the company would be turned into higher competitive stance. Additionally, this article aims to analyze the competitive environment from both internal and external of Marks and Spencer plc (M&S), to evaluate the reasons why it has gone wrong ever since 1997 and to identify how the changes of human resources management could help M&S sharpen its competitive edge. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part focuses on the background M&S has been facing ever since 1997 that the company is suffering from a great crisis. The current situation is analyzed in the second part by using the SWOT model to examine the positions and environment of M&S. The third part emphasizes on discussing the human resources management policies that M&S used to respond the weakness discussion during the SWOT analysis. The......

Words: 2351 - Pages: 10

Zara vs H&M Benchmarking

...Zara is H&Ms biggest competitor. They are both fast fashion, cutting edge high street retailers. H&M has a brand value of 13 billion euros so therefore is currently the highest valued fashion brand in Europe. Close on its heels is the equally ambitious Zara, valued at 7.8 billion euros. Both stores have a global vision and excel with their fast, affordable fashion. H&M is clearly in the lead In terms of the number of shops in Europe, the fashion retailer manages more than 2,200 outlets throughout Europe, whilst Zara operates only 1,120 shops. Both companies have online retail, Zara offers a next day home delivery option and free delivery over £50m whereas H&M do not offer this to their customers. According to the research by fashion blogger Angelika, she found Zara clothing to be of a poor quality. Some garments looked unfinished and some items even had zippers and buttons missing. Angelika compared her Zara shopping experience to H&M, and these results proved to be much better. There were no problems found with any of the designs in store, unfortunately the downside to H&M was the fabric, for example the material of a certain blouse and dress was nylon meaning this type of material will cling to your body. 50% of Zara’s clothes are made in Western Europe. This means it can capture catwalk and luxury trends and have them available within stores in weeks. H&M's longer supply chain means it can't compete as fast on fashion, so it tries to do so on price instead: H&M is on......

Words: 292 - Pages: 2

Management of M&S

...assignment is to understand and explore the main principles of the way Marks and Spencer’s operates. In the assignment I will be examine the strengths and weaknesses of the company, however the most critical issues which will be covered in the essay is the leadership and management style and corporate culture of Marks and Spencer’s. Furthermore I will analyse to what extent o regard leadership and management style as the key factors in accounting for Marks and Spencer’s relative underperformance over the last 20 years. Explain 5 strengths and 5 weaknesses of Marks and Spencer’s Referring back to the case study, we can see that Marks and Spencer have a very well known recognition of their brand, which links to quality. In the late 1880’s the company introduced the ‘St Michael’ logo as a sign of quality. With the brand linked to quality has helped the company build loyalty with their customers as they always ensure that their products are consistent and of high quality. This has of course helped Marks and Spencer gain rewards in terms of profit. Another strength which the company comprise is the good reputation of customer service. Marks and Spencer’s tend to focus a lot on their customer services; with one of their fundamental principles was to ‘provide friendly, helpful service and greater shopping comfort and convenience to customers’ Marks and Spencer’s assistants all carried tape measures to assure a good fit and also exchanging and refunding in the company was not......

Words: 950 - Pages: 4

M and S

...company sell all stylish, high quality ,home proudcts and all luxurious goods across the world. M&S aims to provides quality and best shopping experience to all the customers. SWOT ANALYSIS OF MARKS & SPENCER STRENGTH: M&S was a reputed company and it has competition in an international market.We deliver quality manufacturing and innovative and unique way of shopping infrastructure. WEAKNESSES: The cost of the products are high compare to other brands and there was a lack of fashionable trends to attract the younger generation of the 21st century.M&S are taking longer time to forecast and bring changes in their business. OPPORTUNITIES: M&S are targeting to linked up or merger with the international companies to grow at the faster rate globally.This company are needed to identify and overcome to attract not only the youngsters but also the older generation. THREATS: Economic changes are slightly down because of the changing needs of the customers.Due to the varities of retail markets the competition level has increased at a higher rate. Customers demand are increasing but somehow they are unwilling to fulfill needs and wants of the customers demands. PEST ANALYSIS OF M&S POLITICAL FACTOR: In modern organization there was a lage affects of the global politics. With this political factor it may impede the development of the better organization. ECOMONIC FACTOR: M&S these organizations are highly allocated with the economic factors. In this stage while......

Words: 408 - Pages: 2

M&S and Zara

...Defining the Market The industry that M&S are operating in is the textile apparel industry. This is a highly competitive industry that is constantly changing and it is crucial for companies in this industry to adapt to new trends and customer needs. M&S have a strong focus on consistent quality and high standards. They have been aware of technological factors and social changes within this market and have reacted in particular to the technological evolutions effectively, helping them to achieve one of their core competencies that is, quality. Driving forces in this industry proved difficult for M&S, globalization, the development of casual trends, and accelerating fashion cycles were major evolutions that became prevalent in the textile apparel industry, M&S were not reacting to these factors well and so they were becoming quite lost in their own market. Macro Economic Factors/PEST Analysis. Technological Issues The textile apparel industry is becoming to rely on technology for faster production systems and better quality products. We have seen that M&S have had a successful technological component to their organization, close co-operation with suppliers and the use of the latest technology has been the foundation for achieving the highest quality in their products. The fashion industry is going to keep evolving with the newest technology, it is vital that brands react to this macro-economic factor as it will be what may differentiate you from......

Words: 1878 - Pages: 8

Gap vs Zara

...Zara vs. GAP Inc. American GAP and Spanish ZARA Abstract We are going to compare two super giant clothing retail companies of the world in this thesis. These two giants are dominating apparel retailing market nowadays with their simple and attractive with high level quality of clothes. We will try two analyze working culture, business performance and history, competition and geographic dominance of two clothing retailer giants. Years before two small stores opened and they succeed to dominate market with their modern style and different business doing. • Zara has already changed the fashion industry. - Business Insider Zara is most #58 biggest brand in the world according to Forbes. • America's largest apparel retailer is embarking on a turnaround plan to recapture cool customers. - Business Insider Gap inc is #745 Gap biggest brand in the worlds according to Forbes Zara shops followed swiftly in New York in 1989, Paris in 1990. Now the group has nearly 3,900 stores in 70 countries around the world. Gap has 3,100 stores globally and employs about 150,000 people. A Gap spokeswoman declined to comment on the loss of the top spot to Zara. Let's check analyses of these two giants with full provided information. Firstly take brief tour to their history and about founders. Brief History of Brands Fashion giant, Zara, forms part of the retail group ‘Grupo Inditex’ which Mintel (2007) acknowledges as one of the “largest, fastest......

Words: 5155 - Pages: 21

M&S Solutions

...Joel A Alvarado Perez 1. Why are M&S in this predicament? Has increased overseas sourcing helped or hindered their marketplace performance? Business was only getting worse for M&S through the 1990’s. The company started off on top of the department store chain, but by 1998, sales began dropping. By 1998, sales had dropped by 6%. As oppose to helping themselves by increasing the sourcing overseas, they spread out too fast and were not able to manage all of their new factories. 5 Factories were closed in that same time period. As they were losing control of their business, competitors made their arrival and easily took over the fashion industry knocking M&S off their throne for some years 2. Given that costs must be reduced, how can M&S capture the potential benefits of low-cost sourcing whilst still improving responsiveness? * M&S was one of the first companies to buy directly from the manufacturer, which reduced some costs. On top of that, worked with the largest suppliers in order to reduce the cost of manufacturing and shipping the goods, thus allowing the reduced costs. By having a consolidation warehouse, it was easier and more efficient for M&S to be able to ship it’s own product to its stores as oppose to having to set up different ship locations with the manufacturer. M&S was then able to perfect this Supply chain as they were more in control of the distribution of their goods 3. Is the current one-size-fits all......

Words: 517 - Pages: 3

M&S and Zara

...1a.What is innovative about Zara? • Marketing strategy: Zara is not popular because of advertising but by store locations, customer’s voice and their products successfulness in targeting toward the right audience. • Keeping up with current fashion: Customers can walk into Zara one day and find something complete new they would not have found the week before and will not be able to find the next. Zara is always changing styles to keep up with the latest fashion trends. For example, if they see a trend on the runway they can have it in the stores within seven days at low- to middle-range prices. Zara’s successful products are a little changed in either color, accessories, material or styling to not become outdated. • Their objective: “is not that customers buy a lot but that they buy often and will find something new every time they enter the store.” 1b. What are the major differences in Zara’s supply chain when compared with that of M&S? • Length of the supply chain:  Zara’s value chain includes 17 steps while M&S involves thirty steps.  This makes a huge difference in lead times and inventory holding costs.  Because Zara has fewer steps they are able to spot a new fashion and create those articles much faster than M&S, sometimes leaving those fashions out of style once they are available on the rack.   • Number of outsource elements: Zara only outsources two elements of their supply chain whereas M&S outsources nine.  Zara built their own central......

Words: 1508 - Pages: 7

Mr Fighting | La La La Baazaar Movie Songs.mp3 | The Nun 4K Blu-ray