Normative Model V. Force Field

In: Business and Management

Submitted By thereseabennett
Words 505
Pages 3
MEMO 14 October 2012

TO: Dr. Babcock, John
FROM: NAME
SUBJECT: Normative Model v. Force Field

1. Normative model is a model that will evaluate any alternative solutions to the question, “What is going on?” then suggests what is to be done according to a standard (Normative Model, 2012). There are limits to the amount of information a person can manage and there are shortcuts that can be used to simplify decision making. In this model, solutions that are chosen and meet the minimum requirements are good enough (Models of Decision-Making, 2012). The advantages of this method are looking at the alternative solutions, and a simplified decision making process. The concerns of the method are the “good enough” choices, and minimum requirements. The valid data generated from this model would include the chosen solutions for making a change within a company. The impact of readiness to change is affected by asking the question what is going on then finding a solution to it. The implementation concerns are the minimum requirements may not be what the company is looking for.
2. Force field analysis is a decision-making technique that analyzes forces for and against change to help communicate reasoning behind decisions (Force Field Analysis, 2012). This analysis is meant to look at all the factors included in the change process and evaluate the pros and cons. Then the company can create strategies to decrease the impact of contrasting forces and strengthen the supportive forces (Force Field Analysis, 2008). The advantages of this method are that it looks at both the pros and cons, is strengthens the supportive forces, and decreases the impact of contrasting forces. The concerns of this method are all the cons may not get a decrease of impact, and a lack of commitment to the change. The valid data generated from this model are the pros and cons of the…...

Similar Documents

The Five Forces Model of Competition

...The Five Forces Model of Competition The model above is known as the Five Forces Analysis which was designed and created by Michael Porter of Harvard Business School. Each shape defines the five forces that shape competitive rivalry and is relevant to industry profitability. Each new entrant to an industry faces competitive pressures from: • Buyer bargaining power and seller buyer collaboration. • Companies in other industries to win buyers over to substitute products. • Supplier bargaining power and supplier-seller collaboration. • The threat of new entrants into the market. • Rivalry among competing sellers to attract new customers. For a new entrant to the automobile industry there is generally a very low threat. In order for a new entrant to be successful they must be able to mass-produce. Due to the expense of mass production, a new entrant must have a large amount of capital to compete in the automobile industry. Buyers and customers both have high bargaining power when purchasing an automobile. Buyer power is strong when a consumer has a multitude of products to choose from. An example would be choosing to purchase a Ford Expedition or Chevrolet Tahoe. Both are similar in size, gas mileage per gallon, seating and engine size. Each vehicle is produced by a different manufacturer which gives the consumer the ability to create competition. In addition manufacturers are forced to create quality automobiles in order to maintain......

Words: 540 - Pages: 3

Porter's Five Forces Model

...Military University Abstract Porter’s Five Forces Model is a holistic approach towards competitive strategy. The model provides a framework for the strategic direction of management teams that are seeking an edge over their competitors and additional factors that may undermine profits. The model displays the dynamics between the competitive rivals, buyer’s bargaining power, suppliers, new entrant’s threat and substitutes. The implementation of Porter’s Five Forces Model is crucial on international business practice in order to establish a successful overseas operation and reduce cost of expansion. Global business expansion has become a common practice. Modern organizations are prone to take advantage of international attractive markets that are highly profitable and offer incentives for foreign companies. Implementation of the model increases the chances of success for firms that are considering branching out or simply starting a new company overseas. The Company’s management strategic vision also benefits from Porter’s Model because it points out the forces that affect the organization’s profitability. However, Porter’s modeling techniques have some limitations such as the absence of providing meaningful advice for preventive actions and profitability based solely on fighting competitors without taking in consideration opportunities of competitive strategic alliances. In conclusion, Porter’s Five Forces Model influences the profitability, product......

Words: 1220 - Pages: 5

The V Model + Web Testing

...The V Model The V-Model has proven very popular over recent years and has probably replaced the Waterfall Model as the established model of software development. It is interesting to consider that the V-Model could not have existed without the prior experiences gained from usage of the Waterfall Model. If the Waterfall Model is the stern father then the V-Model is the popular son. Delve deeper into its usage and application, however, and one sees that it is not a panacea for all software development ills. Consider the representation of the V-Model below: The V-Model You can take the V-Model as a Waterfall Model snapped in the middle and bent upwards. You then have two 'stalks'; in broad terms, the left stalk represents design activities and the right stalk represents test activities. The flow is from the top left point of the 'vee' where the Statement Of the User Propblem (SOUP) is defined, down to the vertex where code is created and unit tested, up to the top right point of the 'vee' where the end-user validates the software against the original needs as defined by the SOUP. Whereas the Waterfall Model represents a series of sequential steps, the V-Model recognises the increasing importance of testing in the lifecycle. Testing, in the form of planning and review of requirement specifications and design specifications, starts right at the beginning of the lifecycle, unlike the older model where test activities are started further down the line . SOUP & User......

Words: 3641 - Pages: 15

Force Field Analysis

...Force field analysis From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Force field analysis is an influential development in the field of social science. It provides a framework for looking at the factors (_forces_) that influence a situation, originally social situations. It looks at forces that are either driving movement toward a goal) (helping forces) or blocking movement toward a goal (hindering forces). The principle, developed by Kurt Lewin, is a significant contribution to the fields of social science, psychology, social psychology, organizational development, process management, and change management. Lewin, a social psychologist, believed the "field" to be a Gestalt psychological environment existing in an individual's (or in the collective group) mind at a certain point in time that can be mathematically described in a topological constellation of constructs. The "field" is very dynamic, changing with time and experience. When fully constructed, an individual's "field" (Lewin used the term "life space") describes that person's motives, values, needs, moods, goals, anxieties, and ideals. Lewin believed that changes of an individual's "life space" depend upon that individual's internalization of external stimuli (from the physical and social world) into the "life space." Although Lewin did not use the word "experiential," (see experiential learning) he nonetheless believed that interaction (experience) of the "life space" with "external...

Words: 836 - Pages: 4

Force Field Analysis

...What is force field Analysis? Force field analysis is a management technique developed by Kurt Lewin, a pioneer in the field of social sciences, for diagnosing situations. It will be useful when looking at the variables involved in planning and implementing a change program and will undoubtedly be of use in team building projects, when attempting to overcome resistance to change. Kurt Lewin assumes that in any situation there are both driving and restraining forces that influence any change that may occur. Driving Forces: Driving forces are those forces affecting a situation that are pushing in a particular direction; they tend to initiate a change and keep it going. In terms of improving productivity in a work group, pressure from a supervisor, incentive earnings, and competition may be examples of driving forces. Restraining Forces: Restraining forces are forces acting to restrain or decrease the driving forces. Apathy, hostility, and poor maintenance of equipment may be examples of restraining forces against increased production. Equilibrium is reached when the sum of the driving forces equals the sum of the restraining forces. In our example, equilibrium represents the present level of productivity, as shown below. Steps involved in Force Field Analysis Step-1 : Prepare the statement of the problem or issues under study (note : make sure that the statement is indicative and provide clear understanding and perspective regarding the cause......

Words: 1652 - Pages: 7

Five Forces Model

...Porter five forces analysis is a framework to analyse level of competition within an industry and business strategy development. It draws upon industrial organization (IO) economics to derive five forces that determine the competitive intensity and therefore attractiveness of a market. Attractiveness in this context refers to the overall industry profitability. An "unattractive" industry is one in which the combination of these five forces acts to drive down overall profitability. A very unattractive industry would be one approaching "pure competition", in which available profits for all firms are driven to normal profit. This analysis is associated with its principal innovator Michael E. Porter of Harvard University (as of 2014). Porter referred to these forces as the micro environment, to contrast it with the more general term macro environment. They consist of those forces close to a company that affect its ability to serve its customers and make a profit. A change in any of the forces normally requires a business unit to re-assess the marketplace given the overall change in industry information. The overall industry attractiveness does not imply that every firm in the industry will return the same profitability. Firms are able to apply their core competencies, business model or network to achieve a profit above the industry average. A clear example of this is the airline industry. As an industry, profitability is low and yet individual companies, by applying unique......

Words: 364 - Pages: 2

Six Force Model

...Six forces model: The six forces model is a market opportunities analysis model, as an extension to Porter five forces analysis and is more robust than a standard SWOT analysis. However, factors internal to the firm, which are often perceived to be the only true sources of sustained competitive advantage (Barney, 1991) are omitted. The following forces are identified: Competition New entrants End users/buyers Suppliers Substitutes Complementary products/ the government/ the public Criticisms of the five force model: Porter's framework has been challenged by other academics and strategists such as Kevin P. Coyne and Somu Subramaniam who have stated that three dubious assumptions underlie the five forces: That buyers, competitors, and suppliers are unrelated and do not interact and collude That the source of value is structural advantage (creating barriers to entry) That uncertainty is low, allowing participants in a market to plan for and respond to competitive behavior. An important extension to Porter was found in the work of Brandenburger and Barry Nalebuff in the mid-1990s. Using game theory, they added the concept of complementors (also called "the 6th force"), helping to explain the reasoning behind strategic alliances. The idea that complementors are the sixth force has often been credited to Andrew Grove, former CEO of Intel Corporation. According to most references, the sixth force is government or the public. Martyn Richard Jones, whilst......

Words: 333 - Pages: 2

Force Field Analysis

...Forcefield Analysis - Kurt Lewin’s model Sociologist Kurt Lewin developed a 'force field analysis' model (1951) which describes any current level of performance or being as a state of equilibrium between the driving forces that encourage upward movement and the restraining forces that discourage it. Essentially this means that a current equilibrium exists because the forces acting for change are balanced by the forces acting against change. The driving forces are (usually) positive, reasonable, logical, conscious and economic. The restraining forces are (usually) negative, emotional, illogical, unconscious and social/psychological. Both sets of forces are very real and need to be taken into account when dealing with change, or managing change, or reacting to change. Forcefield Analysis restraining forces (against change) current equilibrium driving forces (for change) Increasing the driving forces is not enough for change, as the restraining forces remain in place, and as long as they remain in place it becomes harder to use the driving forces. An analogy is when you push against a spring; the more you push, the harder it becomes and as soon as you stop pushing the spring reverts to its previous position (after having sprung past that point). Therefore unless both the driving and restraining forces are balanced a kind of yo-yo effect results; a change and then a reversion back, and then a change, and then a......

Words: 436 - Pages: 2

Porter's 5 Forces Model

...The Porter’s Five Forces Model illustrates how the competitive landscape in an industryis impacted by five prominent forces. These forces are: Supplier power, Threat of new entrants, Buying power, Threat of substitutes, and Rivalry. The degree of rivalry is the center of this model as the other 4 forces branch off of this. Each of the forces influences the nature of competition in the industry. Additionally, organizational strategies are often impacted as companies formulate their strategies in order to respond to the dominant competitive forces in any particular industry. The bargaining power of suppliers is a reversal of the power of buyers. This force can also be described as the market of inputs. The suppliers of raw materials, labor, and expertise services provide industries and have power over industries (Quick MBA, 2010). The bargaining power is in the price for the materials or services provided. Many industries have a plethora of suppliers that offer these things needed, but some don’t. Some industries only have one or two suppliers and those suppliers can put any price on the materials/services they offer. This is one of the bigger forces within the fast casual industry. Although the supplier power is usually weak, it still has a major impact on the industry. Most restaurants within the industry get their food from various butchers, farmers, and packaging companies; they don’t make their own. For example, most restaurants offer meat. There are many suppliers......

Words: 1885 - Pages: 8

Porter's 5-Forces Model

...THE FIVE FORCES INDUSTRY COMPETITORS. Rivalries naturally develop between companies competing in the same market. Competitors use means such as advertising, introducing new products, more attractive customer service and warranties, and price competition to enhance their standing and market share in a specific industry. To Porter, the intensity of this rivalry is the result of factors like equally balanced companies, slow growth within an industry, high fixed costs, lack of product differentiation, overcapacity and price-cutting, diverse competitors, high-stakes investment, and the high risk of industry exit. There are also market entry barriers. PRESSURE FROM SUBSTITUTE PRODUCTS. Substitute products are the natural result of industry competition, but they place a limit on profitability within the industry. A substitute product involves the search for a product that can do the same function as the product the industry already produces. Porter uses the example of security brokers, who increasingly face substitutes in the form of real estate, money-market funds, and insurance. Substitute products take on added importance as their availability increases. BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS. Suppliers have a great deal of influence over an industry as they affect price increases and product quality. A supplier group exerts even more power over an industry if it is dominated by a few companies, there are no substitute products, the industry is not an important consumer for the......

Words: 1142 - Pages: 5

Five Forces Model

...www.hbrreprints.org Awareness of the five forces can help a company understand the structure of its industry and stake out a position that is more profitable and less vulnerable to attack. The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy by Michael E. Porter Included with this full-text Harvard Business Review article: 1 Article Summary The Idea in Brief—the core idea The Idea in Practice—putting the idea to work 2 The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy 18 Further Reading A list of related materials, with annotations to guide further exploration of the article’s ideas and applications Reprint R0801E The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy The Idea in Brief The Idea in Practice You know that to sustain long-term profitability you must respond strategically to competition. And you naturally keep tabs on your established rivals. But as you scan the competitive arena, are you also looking beyond your direct competitors? As Porter explains in this update of his revolutionary 1979 HBR article, four additional competitive forces can hurt your prospective profits: By understanding how the five competitive forces influence profitability in your industry, you can develop a strategy for enhancing your company’s long-term profits. Porter suggests the following: • Savvy customers can force down prices by playing you and your rivals against one another. • Powerful suppliers may constrain your profits if they charge......

Words: 12233 - Pages: 49

Pepsi Forces Model Analysis

...PepsiCo’s Five Forces Analysis PepsiCo’s world-wide success is related to its business capabilities, especially in overcoming the challenges and problem shown in this Porter Five Forces analysis. Michael Porter developed the Five Forces analysis model to determine the most significant external factors that influence Company. For PepsiCo to maintain its market rank as the second largest food-and-beverage company in the world, it must show the potential problems identified in this model. PepsiCo also needs to continually adjust its strategies to effectively respond to the external factors significant in the food and beverage industry competition A Five Forces model analysis of PepsiCo reveals that the companyshould prioritize the effect of competition and the influences of consumers and substitutes. These forces shape PepsiCo’s strategies.. Because of the global nature of its business, PepsiCo faces varying in external factors in its industry environment. However, the overall result of these factors and the corresponding that model are summarized as the given below , with indicators of the strengths of their forces of model on PepsiCo: 1. Competitive rivalry or competition 2. Bargaining power of buyers or customers 3. Bargaining power of suppliers 4. Threat of substitutes or substitution 5. Threat of new entrants or new entry Competitive Rivalry or Competition with PepsiCo (Strong Force) – The Coca-Cola Company is one of most......

Words: 974 - Pages: 4

Bmw Five Force Model

...Company Overview Industry Analysis Porter Five Force Model Analysis We will define BMW’s industry as the luxury and exclusive car industry which is a specific sector of the automobile industry. This market refers to automobiles that provide pleasant or desirable features beyond the necessary need. The additional value can be reflected in the equipment, performance, comfort, design, status and prestige that the product supplies. Threat of new entrants: The threat of new entrants to the luxury car industry is relatively low. In order to enter the automotive market, an enormous amount of capital is required. Besides capital, a new firm that is interested in entering the market needs to conduct in-depth research beforehand. An entering firm would need a tremendous amount of implicit and explicit knowledge in order to design and manufacture a product that has never been presented or offered before. An automobile manufacturing facility is very specific and specialized; therefore in the event of a failure or malfunction, the cost of repair is extensive. Brand equity is an additional barrier to entry. Exclusive high quality luxury car brands have established extremely high brand equity- value over time. This is one of the main reasons why the public is willing to pay premium price for it. Although the barriers to this exclusive market are substantial, there are various ways around this obstacle. Companies who are well established in the automobile sector may enter the......

Words: 2049 - Pages: 9

Porter’s Five Forces Model

...APPENDIX 1 - Porter’s Five Forces Model by 0726335 The analysis of Cosmetic Industry has come out with Poter’s five forves model to analyze the level of rivalry in this industry. In the Porter’s Five Forces Model the rivalry which is in the middle is most powerful of the five compentitive forces. Rivalry among competing firms (High) There are a large number of competitors in this industry, and all competitors are competing for the same customers. Thus Carlina have to compete against its direct competitors that sell similar products. The large number of direct competitors in the industry causes a high degree of rivalry. Competitors are also selling similar products, which is cosmetic product. Due to having so many options, customer is able to switch between brands easily. The industry is in its maturity stage causing the market growth to be static. Thus all companies are striving to maintain its market share in the industry against their competitors. Barriers to enter for new competitors (Moderate) The barriers to enter for new competitors are at a moderate, especially during the maturity stage of the industry’s life cycle. Majority of firms that already existed in the industry have developed economies of scale, thus providing a cost advantage to them over the new entrants. If new companies try to enter into the market, it will face problems especially to cover for the expenditures, as they have not......

Words: 557 - Pages: 3

5 Force Model

...• FIVE FORCE MODEL IN THEORY AND PRACTICE: ANALYSIS FROM AN EMERGING ECONOMY • FIVE FORCE MODEL IN THEORY AND PRACTICE: ANALYSIS FROM AN EMERGING ECONOMY ABSTRACT For thirty years, the five-force model of Michael Porter has been used as a standard tool to analyze and determine industry attractiveness. In a recent interview to mark thirty years of the theoretical framework, Porter reaffirmed his faith in the model, quoting examples from the airline and steel industries. The model along with the others that Porter has developed, such as the value chain, strategic groups and national competitive advantage, continue to influence strategic thinking in profound ways. And yet, one cannot help observing that perhaps the time has come to re-examine these models in the light of empirical evidence. This paper attempts to argue that the usefulness of the five-force model is limited in emerging economies as compared to mature markets. A longitudinal study of the IT Enabled Services Industry in India demonstrates that with low entry barriers, a high degree of competition (industry rivalry), bargaining power of buyers (Fortune 100 companies), bargaining power of suppliers (large manufacturers of hardware who force technological up gradation at regular intervals), and the absence of clear differentiators (or close substitutes being offered), the industry should have been very unattractive according to the five-force model. On a practical level though, the paper shows......

Words: 4583 - Pages: 19

The Sims 模擬市民手機版 | 36 Opinii | The Italian Alphabet