Rights of Accused

In: Other Topics

Submitted By mktp
Words 742
Pages 3
Rights of Accused
Maurice Paul
Professor: Dr. Jane El-Yacoubi.
Course: POL 110
April 29, 2012

The rights of the accused gave individual’s person the security of which papers, houses and other effects against any unreasonable searches and seizures. Which shall not be violated, as a result, no warrants will issue upon a probable causes; No individual cannot be held for a crime and or otherwise infamous crime unless that individual’s is indicted by a grand jury. Also a person cannot or subjected to the same offence twice (meaning double jeopardy). Therefore, an individual cannot be retrial after a conviction, acquittal, mistrials and multiple punishments through the state of government. Hence, a person cannot be a witness against himself/herself and cannot be deprive of life, liberty or prosperity without due process of the law which, is written in the Constitution. Also in all criminal prosecution, the person accused has the right to a speedy and public trial by a jury. The accused must be informed of the accusation and can be confronted with any witness against him/herself in the court of law. The accused can provide any witness in his/her favor and have the rights to assistance of counsel by the court if necessary in his/her defensed. These rights were written in the fourth, fifth, six and fourteen amendment to protect each individual’s even if you are not a citizen of the United State of America.
Our Constitution states one law in the fifth and fourteen amendments; the Fifth Amendment is reference to “Due Process” which is the only one of multiple promises of protection of the Bill of Rights which, gives citizens right against the federal and state governments. The Bill of Rights guarantees Due Process which also required in the fourteen amendments. Thus, the State and federal government are obligation is the same, giving rights to be trial by jury.…...

Similar Documents

Rights of the Accused

...Framers of the constitution made sure that the government they created would not engage in practices such as inadvertently convicting individuals of crime that they did not commit. The Bill of rights and the constitution protects individuals accused of committing crimes in the United States. Among such rights “Due Process of Law” is the protection against arbitrary deprivation of life, liberty or property that was preserved in Fifth and fourteenth amendments of the United States constitution. In simple words it states that any person who is accused of crime will be guaranteed a fair and unbiased trail in order to prove their innocence. Due process of law is again divided in to Procedural due process of law states that government must use fair proceedings and Substantial due process states that the laws under which the government acts must be constitutional. According to George, (1989), some of the protections under procedural due process are rights against unreasonable searches and seizures, rights against double jeopardy, rights against self incrimination, right to fair trail, right to counsel and right to jury trail in the civil cases. Substantial due process is often used to overthrow government actions when it interferes with individual freedom when no more specific constitutional argument can be found. Marriage and abortion laws come under substantial due process for the people of United States. The notion of Substantial due process flourished during the Franklin......

Words: 1007 - Pages: 5

Rights of the Accused

...Rights of Accused Craig Bishop POL 110 Strayer University Professor Eaton May 2012 Due Process Due process is a set of rules that are in place to protect people’s rights, this process insure that state and federal governments do not abuse its powers and treats all fairly. Basically due process prohibits the government from taking in-appropriate actions that would take away a person’s liberty or property, without giving proper notice of any action is taken. The right to due process is in the fifth and fourteenth amendment, this is also known as the due process clause. (LawInfo, 2010) Due Process and Its Origins Due process goes back even farther. It can be traced back to the Magna Carta in 1215; the barons of England said that the powers of the King are not unlimited. They said that his powers were limited by the essential principles of justice and fairness; it also stated that the King could not seize anyone’s property indiscriminately. (Hornberger, 2005) However, the origin of due process in the United States began when Thomas Jefferson was writing the Declaration of Independence, he wanted to make sure that the rights of the people were protected. Thomas Jefferson knew from the past that a government with too much power could over run a person at their will. So he incorporated the ideas of the Magna Carta into our Constitution. (Hornberger, 2005) Over time this “Law of the Land” became “due process of the law”, in time the...

Words: 572 - Pages: 3

Rights of the Accused

...In clause 39 of the Magna Carta, John of England said, “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.” Many a times, people have been wrongfully accused of crimes they did not commit and have faced unfair trials. The composers of the Constitution have gone to great lengths to ensure that our new government does not engage in such practice. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights now consist of a series of protections for someone who has been accused of committing a crime in the United States. The Constitution states only one command twice. The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no person shall be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.” The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments provide the assurance of fair procedure. The Bill of Rights gives a number of rights affordable to those who have been charged with crimes. The basis of these rights is the belief that all individuals are innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof is on the government to justify or give reason for the arrest and detention of a suspect in a crime. A writ of habeas corpus is used to bring a prisoner or detainee before the court to determine if the imprisonment is lawful. An individual cannot be......

Words: 613 - Pages: 3

Right

...ight Right Word Wrong Word Words and structures confused and misused by learners of English L. G. Alexander LONGMAN Addison Wesley Longman Limited Edinburgh Gate, Harlow Essex CM20 2JE, England and Associated Companies throughout the world. © Longman Group UK Limited 1994 All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Publishers. First published 1994 Fifth impression 1997 Illustrated by Chris Ryley British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Alexander, L. G. Right Word Wrong Word: Words and Structures Confused and Misused by Learners of English. - (Longman English Grammar Series) I. Title II. Ryley, Chris III. Series 428.24 ISBN 0-582-21860-8 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Alexander, L.G. Right word wrong word: words and structures confused and misused by learners of English/L.G. Alexander. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-58221860-8 1. English language-Usage. 2. English language-Errors of usage. I. Title. PE1460.A48 1993 428.2'4-dc20 93-11963 CIP We have been unable to trace the copyright holder of the text for Exercise 52 Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, Nobody and would appreciate any information that would enable us to do so. Set in Times New Roman, TrueType Produced through Longman Malaysia, ETS ISBN 0 582 21860 8 ...

Words: 150405 - Pages: 602

Rights of the Accused

...Rights of the Accused Down through the years our Constitution has undergone many changes and revisions for the sake of equality. The Constitution defines the rights of a free people, whose rights and liberty are derived from their creator (Meese, 2009). After the Civil War new amendments were added to the Constitution in order to ban slavery and protect newly freed slaves. The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, implemented no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law (Wilson, 2011). The Fourteenth and the Fifth Amendment represent the right of due process. The due-process clause refers to fair procedures and equal protection of laws for all persons in the United States. The Fifth Amendment, ratified in 1791, also insists that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. Even though this amendment applies to the federal government, the due process clause guarantees that a party will receive a fair, orderly, and just judicial proceeding (Cornwell, 2005). The Constitution prohibits all levels of government from unfairly depriving individuals of their Constitutional Rights. Due process was designed to protect the accused against abuses by the federal government. Evidence gathered illegally or unlawfully can not be used in a trial. This method refers to the exclusionary rule. This rule allows evidence that was gathered in violation to the Constitution to be excluded and not......

Words: 948 - Pages: 4

Accused Versus Victim’s Rights

...Accused Versus Victim’s Rights The United States of America relies on due process of law to ensure equal protection of life, liberty and property to all citizens. Police officers work tirelessly to accommodate regulations adopted to ensure only criminals are convicted. These restrictions have been part of the United States since the Bill of Rights was generated in 1791, but in the 1960s, as “Law and Order,” the view that crime must be dealt with harshly to deter citizens from breaking the law, the Supreme Court was forced to decide the constitutionality of the rules of interrogation. In the Sixties, crime was escalating and public safety was becoming a growing concern; police began to treat suspects harsher in an effort to raise conviction rates and promote public safety. In 1966, however, the jurisprudence of the entire US justice system changed when the court of Chief Justice Earl Warren was presented with the case Miranda v Arizona. In this case, the majority decision ruled to protect suspects’ rights, extending equality of protection regardless of legal knowledge or background, not only highlighting the trends of human rights and equality in the Sixties, but also the tensions between criminal rights versus public safety, demonstrating a shift from the conservative ‘law and order’ jurisprudence to more liberal methods of interrogation and conviction.  On March 2, 1963, Ernesto Miranda kidnapped a woman (whose name was not released to the press for her safety), drove her......

Words: 1921 - Pages: 8

Rights of the Accused

...Rights of the Accused POL110 Jeanette Ramirez Professor Rogers May 1, 2013 Introduction This paper will discuss how due process operates, in the criminal justice system. We will take an in depth look into how the due process effects the criminal justice system. However, in order for anyone to understand due process in the criminal justice, one must first know the meaning of due process. The most commonly used form of sentencing is probation, meaning the suspect is set free but under supervision of a probation officer. Define due process and its origins. According to Black’s Law Dictionary: "Due Process of law implies the right of the person affected thereby to be present before the tribunal which pronounces judgment upon the question of life, liberty, or property, in its most comprehensive sense; to be heard, by testimony or otherwise, and to have the right of converting, by proof, every material fact which bears on the question of right in the matter involved. If any question of fact or liability be conclusively presumed against him, this is not due process of law." Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 500. Due process is a very complex subject to try to explain and define to where it is understood. In all its complexity due process just simply means that it holds the government subservient to the land of the law. Due process originated from the Magna Carta (1215), which were the Great Charter of English liberties where the nobles limited the King’s......

Words: 1003 - Pages: 5

The Accused

...I’ve read this book written by John Grisham that is called The Accused. The book is about thirteen year old Theodore Boone who knows more about the law than most adult lawyers. And as a young crimefighter he never thought he would become a suspect of a crime himself. He is namely accused of a robbery after a computer turns up in his school locker, so troughout the book Theo, with the help of his uncle Ike are trying to find the real felon. Theo is really smart for his age, which has to do with that he is the son of two lawyers and that he spends most of his time in their office and in courtrooms. He is also very single-minded and knows what he stands for and what he wants to achive. One thing i remember from the book is when Theo gets permission to go to one of the biggest trials of the year, and stands before his classmates before he leaves school for it with his yellow legal pad and looked att tem as if he was a real lawyer preparing to adress the jury. Then he says "All right, Show of hands. Who thinks Pete Duffy is guilty?" Pete Being the suspect. And after almost everybody raised their hands he became furious and began to educate them about the ”presumtion of innocence” which gave me a really good picture of this little genious boy and made me want to read further about his experiences of the law. I really liked this book since it was alot about the law which I truly love, and one thing that was even better is that the author kept me guessing troughout......

Words: 294 - Pages: 2

Goldman Accused of Subprime Fraud

...Goldman accused of subprime fraud By Francesco Guerrera and Henny Sender in New York Published: April 16 2010 16:11 | Last updated: April 17 2010 00:56 US authorities on Friday accused Goldman Sachs of securities fraud that caused investor losses of more than $1bn, in the toughest regulatory crackdown so far on the excesses of the credit-bubble era. News of the civil action by the Securities and Exchange Commission wiped more than $12bn off the market value business model, and rocked other banks. The SEC move came as President Barack Obama made a final push for financial reform in the Senate Goldman and one of its vice-presidents of failing to disclose that in 2007 the hedge fund Paulson & Co had a major role in creating a collaterised debt obligation, a security backed by subprime mortgages, so that it could bet against it. d the firm and its position of Lloyd Blankfein CDO but did not name any executives. Goldman shares closed nearly 13 per cent lower to $160.70. The civil complaint alleges that Goldman and Fabrice Tourre, one of its vice-presidents, hid from investors the fact that Paulson & Co, which has not been charged, had a heavy hand in influencing the composition of loans that made up the CDO. Mr Tourre could not be reached for comment. - Within nine months of the creation of the CDO, 99 per cent of its loans had been downgraded, yielding Paulson & Co a profit of $1bn. Investors around the globe including IKB, the German bank which became the first......

Words: 350 - Pages: 2

The Accused

...THE ACCUSED The movie was set 1988 and stars Kelly McGillis and Jodie Foster. It was directed by Jonathan Kaplan and the whole plot of the film was written by Tom Topor. The film is mainly set on a bar where a lot of drinking and dancing takes place. It brings out gang rape that could occur in real life situation. The rape of Cheryl Araujo took place at Big Dan’s Bar in the New Bedford, Massachusetts. The main actor, Sarah, walks into a bar stressed up after breaking up with her boyfriend as a result of drug possession issues. Dressed in a provocative manner, she walks into the bar and starts dancing. During the dancing session, she finds a young man whom she started flirting with. The scene gets worse when the young man lays her down and starts assaulting her sexually in front of many onlookers who cheer up the situation. Other two men come in and join in raping the helpless lady. At last, she finds space and escapes towards the rod yelling for help. This is a very heart touching film which portrays a lot of negative things that happen to women. The accused found a strong lawyer whom helped him to lower the extent of the case much to the dismay of Sarah. The story also portrays that rape victims could be suspects themselves in the manner in which the act takes place. Like in this case, she was dressed in a provocative manner and her dance also played a major role in the incidence. The film creates a lot of social and psychological issues such as chemical abuse and life......

Words: 339 - Pages: 2

Right to Counsel

...RIGHT TO COUNSEL 1 Originating when the sixth amendament was ratified on December 15, 1791 the right to council in the United States was born. This amendment states the following. “In criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district where the crime was committed. Also, the district shall have been previously determined by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation. To be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense” (Amendment 6, 2009). Development of the Right to Counsel The Constitution specifies that the accused possess the right to counsel however, there is no specifications which states that counsel will be available from the government for the individual who have been accused. In most cases, only individuals who are afforded the employment of an attorney would have the indulgence of being represented by one. The right to counsel is a service no longer just limited to adults or to individuals who have financial means of being able to retain attorney but any individual who requests representation. At one time, the right to counsel was a service that was offered to those individuals involved in cases being tried within a criminal trial; however, this is no longer the scenario. Right to counsel can be for any case; criminal,......

Words: 1188 - Pages: 5

Rights

...One of the greatest challenges facing the criminal justice system is the need to balance the rights of accused criminals against society’s interest in imposing punishments on those convicted of crimes. This tension is illustrated by the debate over whether defendants have the right to be represented by an attorney. Most Americans are familiar with the Miranda warning, which advises suspects of their rights that are guaranteed by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments: Criminal suspects have the right to refuse to answer questions from police; they have the right to an attorney; and if they cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for them at no charge. However, the right to a court-appointed attorney is relatively new. The federal government started providing court-appointed attorneys for felony defendants in the nineteenth century, and some states began appointing lawyers for indigent felony defendants in the early twentieth century. But in 1963, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an attorney must be provided to all criminal defendants in state and federal cases. The case that changed American jurisprudence was Gideon v. Wainwright. Clarence Earl Gideon was a homeless ex-convict with an eighth-grade education. He was arrested in 1961 in Panama City for breaking and entering into a pool hall, a felony under Florida law. At his trial, he asked the court to appoint him a lawyer, but the judge in his case ruled that state law only allowed court-appointed attorneys for......

Words: 1078 - Pages: 5

Bill of Right

...The United States Bill of Right is known to be the first ten amendment of the United States Constitution. It serves to provide protection to the rights of liberty and property basically it provides freedom to individuals personally. The amendment was produced by James Madison to the first United States Congress as a legislative article. This Bill of Right plays an important role in American Law and is a vital symbol of the freedom and culture of our nation. The Fourth amendment to the United States Constitution is the part of the Bill of Right which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures alongside with obtaining any warrant supported by probable cause. The Fifth Amendment protects against abuse of government authority in a legal procedure. The 5th Amendment to the US Constitution was passed by ratified on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights. In the Fifth Amendment no person shall be held to capital to answer unless on a presentment of a Grand Jury. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution is what sets forth rights in the prosecution of criminals. In a criminal prosecution the accuser have the right to a speedy and public trial. The accused has the right to know what they are been charged for and why they are been held in jail. They also have the right to know who is saying that they've committed the crime, and the right to ask them questions. The Eight Amendment to the United States Constitution protects against excessive bail and......

Words: 738 - Pages: 3

Rights

...4/22/2012 POS 111 Unit 4, Question 3 Visit the websites below and then write an essay explaining the distinction between civil rights and human rights. Should the United States be bound by international law concerning human rights? The Merriam-Webster dictionary describes Civil Rights as the nonpolitical rights of a citizen especially the rights of personal liberty guaranteed to the United States citizens by the 13th and 14th amendments to the constitution and by acts of Congress. Our country has been dealing with the issue of civil rights since its existence. The first Civil Rights Act was passed in 1875 which allowed equal rights for African Americans but it was struck down in 1883 because the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution can’t tell private businesses or any individual who to discriminate against. So the struggle for civil rights had to be fought harder. The promises that were made to protect civil rights in the Thirteenth Amendment were first kept then broken. Many states found their way around the flimsy wording of the Fourteenth Amendment. The case of Strauder v. West Virginia, the Supreme Court overturned a law keeping African Americans from jury duty but they refused to extend the amendment so that it contained a more narrow interpretation. One of the biggest segregation problems of our time led to a new era for civil rights which was the integration of the public school system. The NAACP, which is the National Association for the Advancement......

Words: 869 - Pages: 4

Rights of Accused

...RIGHTS OF ACCUSED Assignment 1 Submitted to: Dr. Mehdi Nazer U.S. Government POL110 Prepared By: Nyleeche Perry July 26, 2012 RIGHTS OF ACCUSED Assignment 1 Define due process and its origins. Due process is a fundamental, constitutional guarantee that all legal proceeding will be fair and that one will be given notice of all the proceeding and an opportunity to be heard before the government acts to take away ones life, liberty or property. Due process originated in 1355 in chapter 39 of the Magna Carter although some believe that it goes back farther then that. When due process was discussed in the Magna Carter, it was know as the “law of the land”. Due process is discusses in the fifth as well as the fourteenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution. In the U.S. Constitution, it states that no person shall be denied the right of life, liberty, or property without due process of the law. The due process law means that a person has to be notified of any charges brought up against them. This also means that the accused person has the right to a fair hearing. Explain how due process protects the accused against abuses by the federal government. The due process clause in the Fifth Amendment was intended by the framers to prevent abuse of power on the part of the federal government. Before the Fourteenth Amendment was passed, the Bill of Rights only protected citizens from unfair treatment by the federal...

Words: 698 - Pages: 3

December 3, 2018 | Mary246 9m:12s 0% | Rumi Okubo