Free Essay


In: Business and Management

Submitted By csact1314
Words 4280
Pages 18

Ship “Shell” Hit an Iceberg | Shell Oil Scandal in 2004 | | In 2004, the Shell Company was involved in an oil reserves reporting scandal. It made them caught in low point. | | Ines Chen, Leilani Zhao, Bingchen Wang |

Background……………………………………………………………………….. 2
Purpose of the case study… ………………………………………………...…2
Shell Company, the oil Industry giants………………………………………..3
The Iceberg ----Shell oil scandal ……………………………………………….. 4
Effect of the Scandal ……………………….……………………………………..6
The Origins of the Scandal …….………………………………………………....7
Weak internal controls, the dual company structure ......……………….…7
The shortage of oil reserves and World oil crisis ……………….....………10
The Closed Corporate Culture…………………………….………………..….11
Works Cited………………………………………………………………………15


In recent years, Shell was one of the most famous companies of the world because of excellent long-term planning, outstanding technical capabilities and unique management style. Shell, which was the Anglo-Dutch heritage and a twin board structure, once was treaded as textbook example of a multinational company. When people talked about the Shell Company, they always remembered the old corporate slogan, 'You could be sure of Shell'. Yes, this seemed a mere statement of fact. But such the good company liked this also did some bad things from the mid-1990s. The company had dealt with the environmental and human right's problem, and its competitors took this opportunity to grow bigger. In 2004, the company was involved in an oil reserves reporting scandal. They were caught in low point. Most people think this is the result of the twin board structure.

Purpose of the Case Study:

Corporate failure is never the result of a random set of events. It is normally a reflection of deep-seated corporate shortcomings. In this paper, we will try to analyze this example to find that there is a pattern to corporate failure: what is the Shell 2004 oil reserves reporting scandal? Why did the Shell companies choose to do this? Would they think that this failure was just a risk, they had no choice but to accept in the quest for growth and increased profit.

Shell Company, the oil Industry giants

Royal Dutch Shell, which was known as Shell, is a global oil and gas company. The Shell set headquarters in The Hague, Netherlands and also has a registered office in London, United Kingdom. It is the second-largest energy company and the fifth-largest company in the world. According to a composite measure, Forbes magazine said the Shell is one of the six oil and gas "super majors". “It is vertically integrated and is active in every area of the oil and gas industry, including exploration and production, refining, distribution and marketing, petrochemicals, power generation and trading. It also has major renewable energy activities, including in biofuels, hydrogen, solar and wind power.” (ycharts, 2012)

In 1890, Jean Baptiste August Kessler founded Royal Dutch Petroleum Company in Holland. At the age of Henri Deterding, King William III of the Netherlands awarded this small oil exploration and productions company a Royal charter. After that time, the Royal Dutch was known as "Royal Dutch Company for the Working of Petroleum Wells in the Dutch Indies".

As we know, the Royal Dutch Shell Group was created in February 1907. At this time, the Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and the "Shell" Transport and Trading Company Ltd of the United Kingdom made a decision that they would merge their operations, which was the result of competing globally with the dominant American petroleum company, which was called John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and this action was also the need of the global strategy. After that, the new Group had 60% ownership of the new Group to the Dutch arm, and the "Shell" Transport and Trading Company Ltd got 40% ownership.

The Shell Company had a whole and strong supply chain which helped the Shell reduce its costs. The company’s refineries sold the end product to the consumers all over the world, which gave Shell the chance to earn higher revenues than others and improve profitability, because Shell eliminated the commissions fees which needed paid to middlemen in the supply chain. This is an advantage for Shell over competitors like Valero Energy (VLO), because they did not have exploration and production businesses.

It is a challenge for the company to Sustain long-term growth in the condition that its reserves continue to decline. It is the especial significance for the other companies which were in the face of competition from rivals such as ConocoPhillips; it increased oil reserves from 2004. (Covestor, 2012)

Even though Shell is the second-largest energy company, it also bears the pressure of the intense competition from national or state-owned public companies. Because of backing by their home governments, these large national oil companies earned greater control over access to oil and gas reserves, but it is difficult for other private companies such as Shell to access these reserves.

But the Shell operation in other countries is not successfully, such as Nigeria, because it was experiencing social and political unrest. During the operation, the company was exposed the problem about the risk of political instability. The Shell Company had no choice but to close four plants in Nigeria in order to ensure the safety of its employees; at the same time, its production in Nigeria decreased by 90 percent.

The Iceberg ----Shell oil scandal: On May 28, 2002 the chairman of the Comity of Managing Directors (CMD) at Royal Dutch Shell named Philip Watts wrote an e-mail to the CEO of Exploration and Production Unit (EP) called van de Vijver. In the e-mail, Philip Watts said that Van de Vijver would bring big trouble to the CMD department shortly. He also hoped the review would include consideration of all ways and means of achieving more than reserves replacement ratio of 100 percent in 2002. To mix metaphors considering the whole spectrum of possibilities and leaving no stone unturned (Kremer, 2005).

On September 2002, Van de Vijver submitted a memo to the Committee of Managing Directors. In the memo, he gave some suggestions to the company to fool the market if credibility of the company was high, medium and long-term portfolio refreshment was real or positive trends could be shown on key indicators.

This email gave people a good explanation of the aggressive policy that an indication could replace oil reserves as quickly as oil was being sold. Actually, this problem did not start in 2002; even the year that van de Vijver got the position for CEO in EP form Philip Watts in 2001. Watts had already noticed that actual situation with oil discoveries it was not optimistic like the company’s report. This aggressive policy to push as much oil reserves into balance sheet as possible was one of the reasons behind the oil reserves scandal that struck one of the oldest and well-established oil companies in the world in the beginning of 2004.

On 9 January 2004, the Royal Dutch Shell Group announced that internal reviews revealed that certain “proven” oil reserves had overbooked its oil and gas reserves by 23 percent. It revised the figure three more times (on 18 March, 9 April and 24 May) before admitting it had overstated its reserves by around 23 per cent (Chartered Institute of Management Accountants , 2012). In the following months, people had seen the title full of scandal about the Shell. The stockholder for Shell oil had seen the value of their investment shrink. When a big bubble bursts, there is a powerful reaction against the values of the era that spawned it. Some top managers, including the chief financial officer have stepped down, and police have been asked to step in to investigate and help resolve the matter. Generally speaking, Shell oil had the problem in oil reserves and reporting regulation.

For a number of years prior to 2004, Shell used a different principle to calculate reserves compared with Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). After the implementation of the rules, the SEC and the Financial Services Authority (FSA), the UK regulator, examined stated reserves more closely. They became worried about Shell and in 2001 gave the company signal that they felt the digits and information were false, followed by serious warnings in 2002 and 2003. Shell’s senior management appeared to have rejected and even ignored these concerns in order to make more profit by hiding shortage.

A worker named John Donovan worked with Shell. He was an old worker who worked many years in Shell. Once upon a time, in the 1980s, John and his father Alfred Donovan created promotions for Shell customers. Donovan recalled that there were wonderful relationships of trust with the group in the past. But everything changed since Shell hired a new employee in the marketing department. The newcomer suggested many ideas and strategies that Donovan refused to pay.

He exposed the damage information on the super oil giant. The Public thought that was revenge to Royal Dutch Shell that cost the Anglo-Dutch company billions of dollars and well-known reputation. According to Donovan, “We simply ask the leaders of Shell to respect the principles they claim to honor already” (Grison, 2012). These former employees in Shell oil force the manager to stick to its business principles of integrity, honesty and transparency.

Effect of the Scandal:

This well-known scandal brought numerous losses for the Royal Dutch Shell, loss of company’s credibility stand in the breach. Royal Dutch Shell was a long-established FTSE 100 company. It was also a one of the largest international energy companies, operating in at least 90 countries. So, it always has been seen as the safest of havens for money typically invested by insurance company and pension funds (Messenger, 2004). They organized money in small savings, pension plans, and insurance policies by every common person. The investors had full confidence for Royal Dutch Shell, because Royal Dutch Shell could return the steady and safe money. Moreover, public reliance on the steady supply of energy for Royal Dutch Shell Group, even more than it depended on the integrity of corporate financial reporting. Just like their slogan declares: always be sure of Shell. However, the Shell oil reserves scandal have subverted their thought in the past.

It also led to the decrease of share price in the Royal Dutch Shell. 9 November 2003 in which the people in exploration said he was “sick and tired of lying about the extent of our reserves issues”. The revision on January 2004 caused Shell’s share price to drop by nearly 9 per cent. It trailed the FTSE Oil & Gas Producers sector thereafter – as shown in the chart in the following paragraph. The dramatic drop of the share price caused the company hard to issue a share rights in order to raise future capital. The company became subject to take over, especially if the collapsing share price was due to bad management and other people think they could run the company better.


Moreover, the internal structure of Shell has changed. It caused the resignations of top managers Philip Watts and a series of senior staffs to leave. The fines imposed by the regulators also undermined the company’s constitution. A financial penalty of £17million for market abuse by Shell as a result of announcements made for breaches of the FSA's listing rules and was considered a big amount for the whole company. Furthermore, a court hold in Amsterdam required the payment of 450 million to the non-American shareholders in 2007.

The Origins of the Scandal:

It wasn't an accident, even if this thing did not happen; there exists serious crisis for the Shell Company

* The First one: weak internal controls, the dual company structure

Shell is unique because its structure is a joint venture of internationality. The Shell Company has been listed as one of the world’s three most international organizations; the other two are the Roman Catholic Church and the United Nations. In fact, one of Shell’s outstanding features was the dual ownership structure.

What is the Dual-Class Ownership? According to the dictionary, the Dual-Class Ownership is a type of share division. In those companies, they have differing rights to issue shares. Because they have a dual class ownership structure, the company can issue two classes of shares, called Class A and Class B. Even if these classes may have different rights to vote, they stand for the same foundation ownership in the company. (Investopedia, 2012)

In Shell, this structure date from the 1950s, the presidency of the Shell Company, Loudon initiated this new model. At that time, McKinsey, an external consultant of the Shell Company, did the self-examination about the Shell's management structure. So it led to remodeling of the Shell's organization in 1959. When they established the decentralized operating companies, they delegated responsibilities and authorities to a formal Committee of Managing Directors which was established to give the function of reaching consensus and coordination in the TMT. In principle, the CMD set up a Chairman and a Vice Chairman and also had some other members of the Managing Directors. The chairmanship of the CMD could be either chose from the president of Royal Dutch or the Managing Director of Shell Transport and Trading. Royal Dutch is entitled to have its nominees elected as a majority, and Shell Transport is entitled to have its nominees elected as the balance of the members of the Boards of Directors of the two Group Holding Companies. Every member of the Board of Management of Royal Dutch and every Managing Director of Shell Transport is also a member of the Presidium of the Board of Directors of Shell Petroleum NV and a Managing Director of The Shell Petroleum Company Limited. As such, they are generally known as “Group Managing Directors”. They are also appointed by the Boards of Shell Petroleum NV, while the Shell Petroleum Company Limited is appointed by a joint committee known as the Committee of Managing Directors, which considers and develops objectives and long-term plans.

Dual-ownership structure made the boards of both companies disagreeable and many mergers and acquisition delay could not be implemented.

2000-2001 oil industry launched a large-scale M & A trend, when British Petroleum, TOTAL and other competitors, non-stop expand in the overseas, but Shell stopped its steps, because Shell was involved in the strategic alliance negotiations with Gazprom as early as seven years ago. Until today, they are still in negotiations, while BP has finished the two acquisitions in Russia. Because of missing the opportunities, it has a big influence for Shell and also makes it goes from ranked first in the world suddenly dropped to third in the world.

The Shell Company was the lack of uniform standards in the areas of the delineation and measurement of reserves; what’s more, the various business sub companies also used their own set of standards. But we cannot ignore such a fact that the past 15 years, British Petroleum and other large oil companies had unified standard in their Company, even including their sub companies.

These are not the only problems. When we see the performance of the Shell Group, we cannot see the Group's per share profit on the performance paper. Instead of this we just can see that how much numbers for the Royal Dutch and how much numbers for the Shell Transport. This performance gave people the impression that this does not seem like the Shell Group's performance report, but it looks like the comprehensive performance paper which can divide into those parts: the two parent company's performance report and each business sub companies' reports. In addition, the Corporation to give managers stock options also can divide into two shares of the parent company. * The Second: The shortage of oil reserves and World oil crisis

Even if the oil reserves are the renewable resources, we have managed to burn probably half of all global oil reserves in the last 125 years or so. Until right now, people just found that Oil is a finite commodity that will gradually deplete. Recently, when people had run out of $5 barrel oil, then they used $10 barrel oil, and people just can be now running out of $20 barrel oil or more.
In order to solve this problem, the oil companies started more increasingly aggressive exploration in recent years, but the result of the search has been disappointing in the last 30 years, they said that all major new discoveries have been under water but it is very expensive to produce. People had no choice but accept this fact that most countries oil production in the world had peaked in the last three decades, and world oil production will peak sometime during 2001-2003. When people began drilling the first well, right now the oil production are at a high rate of over 30 billion a year, those meaning the world oil production is nearing its production plateau. So it meant that after 2003, the number of the oil production would be slow and manageable.
According to the data, world now uses 85 million barrels of oil per day, or can said are 40,000 gallons per second. With the time goes by, the demand of oil is growing exponentially. During this time, people just found that they have used more than half of the world’s total reserve. There is no doubt that recently more than 95 percent of all recoverable oil has now been found all over the world by the people. But the serious situation people had to face is that the Oil had been used four times faster than discovered.
Despite the oil had high profits, the big oil companies have failed to use enough money to invest in new development in order to ensure sufficient output, so that the current requirements of the world capitalist economy are not met. No only this, they had not seriously invested in finding the alternative, renewable sources of energy. The world oil crisis would start to form slowly.
By using the Scandal, the Shell Company can have more oil reserves than other competitors; it can get more influence on the world energy markets. Because of the more oil reserves, the stockholder and customers can have more confidence on the Shell Company rather than others, so that the Shell Company can get more market share. To face the huge beneficial temptation, the senior levels of Shell Company made the decision which let them spend their rest of lives from regretting and hiding their shame.

* The Third: The Closed Corporate Culture.

Shell gets a reputation which said they were arrogant with the business partners and also they bully their employees.

Criticism of Shell on its closed corporate culture is nothing new. From the history, people can see that in the first three decades of the twentieth century, Royal Dutch Shell did everything to control the price of oil by limiting competition. They wanted to be dictatorial business leader in the area of the oil. There was once an annual general meeting being disrupted by the protesters because of the sanction breaking.

From the people who ever worked in the Shell Company, they feel that they did not work in an open environment. People were not relaxed and can be free to criticize. Most of the high-level leaders did not like the soul-searching about the actions.

In Shell Company, people could not bear "bullying" within the company, their business partners always admitted that during cooperative process the people who came from the Shell company show that they are all "arrogant". Not only did they believe their technology; also they did everything arrogant of their bones.

The result of this scandal

The oil company has been shocked by the scandal since Royal Dutch/Shell, because the Royal Dutch/Shell was overstated its reserves by around 23 percent. This scandal not only seriously affected the economy of the company, but also influenced the economy of the world. After the 2004 Shell Oil Scandal, Royal Dutch/Shell Group began to re-examine the structure and personal training mechanism. In the staff management, one of the most important things was to regain employees’ confidence.

The former chairman of Royal Dutch/Shell Group Philip Watts felt so sorry about this scandal. He apologized to the public. This scandal wakened the Royal Dutch/Shell Group to take measures, and pushed the company to re-examine the structure and employees’ training mechanism.

The double structure of board of directors was not suitable for the further development of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group, with the pressure of investor, customers, and the general public. Jeroenvander Veer changed the double structure of board of directors to single structure of board of directors, which meant that the company was manage by a board of directors and a CEO. The double structure of board of directors induced bureaucratic inertia, and made the ambiguous lines of responsibility, so the double structure of board of directors decline the efficiency of the company , which was why the Shell Company need to change double structure of board of directors to the single structure of board of a director. July 20, 2005, after the passage of the merger proposal of the board of directors of two companies, Royal Dutch and Shell Transport and unity, the new company named Royal Dutch Shell, which ended the 98 years’ double structure of board of directors. Under the leadership of one person, the Royal Dutch Group became more and more competitive in the management, and improved the efficiency of work in the company when dealing with the serious problems.

Jeroenvander Veer was became the new CEO in July, 2000. He had improved the exploration department, and began implementation plan of Big Cats, which meant that the company would use $1.8 billion on exploration expenditures in one or two years. According to the statistics of Wood Mackenzie, the exploration expenditures were the highest in the industry. Moreover, Jeroenvander Veer also invested $10.5 billion in the production department, in order to search for new oil reserves. As we all know, the oil resource is precious for people’s lives. With the development of society and industry, the demand for oil is increasing more and more increase in the contemporary society, but the oil reserves are becoming lower and lower. We can see these measures were so important for Royal Dutch/Shell to recover the company like before, which can help the Shell Company recover the economy, and then attract more investors, so this is a plan which can rebuild the reputation by ensure the interests of shareholders.

At the same time to improve the corporate governance structure, Royal Dutch/Shell also needs to be aware of the company's internal staff to withstand the enormous pressure and doubts. The 2004 Royal Dutch/Shell scandal was deeply destroyed the confidence of employees and investors. The employees’ confidence significant declined from the leadership, so the Shell Company needed to regain the confidence from employees, and also from the investors. Rick Brown, who was the HR director, visited 3000 global workers, and expanded the changes about talent reserves, training, and retention. The Shell Company began a plan called “Enterprise First”, which means that employees not only needed to think about their own areas, but also need to think about how their own work can effect on other areas. The department would put more money, time, and effort on leadership assessment and development. The employees need more communication with the senior leaders, which allowed the employees and senior leaders to realize more about each other through the world.

All these effective measures took Royal Dutch/Shell Group gradually out of the shadows, and it is still one the most renowned companies in the world. To rebuild the reputation of Royal Dutch/Shell Group, these measures need more time to be completed.


Because of hitting an iceberg, the unsinkable Titanic, right now it was plunging into 12, 000 feet of water near the coast of Newfoundland. One ant hole may cause the collapse of a thousand-li dyke. Because of the 2004 oil scandal, the Shell Company faced their biggest shock for 98 years. Royal Dutch/Shell has an enviable reputation and a proud history, why the good companies do the bad thing. Shell is not the first one and the last one. Companies chose to do this not because they were in the quest for growth and increased profit. This is a role of warning for the other companies. We hoped the same things would not happen in the future.

Works Cited
Chartered Institute of Management Accountants . (2012, 2 15). Understanding the causes of corporate failure. Retrieved 4 29, 2012, from CIMA Financial Management Magazine:
Covestor. (2012). RDS'A. Retrieved 4 26, 2012, from wikinvest:'A)
Donovan, J. (2012, 3 29). The man who shook Shell. Retrieved 4 23, 2012, from Royal Dutch Shell
Investopedia. (2012). Dual-Class Ownership. Retrieved 4 28, 2012, from Investopedia:
Keaney, M. (2004, 4 20). UK: you can be sure of Shell. Retrieved 4 28, 2012, from lists:
Messenger, T. (2004, 7 15). Oil Giant Shell's Investors Shocked. Retrieved 4 28, 2012, from BBC News: ycharts. (2012). Royal Dutch Shell. Retrieved 5 1, 2012, from ycharts:…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Bash Shell a Unix shell written by Brian Fox for the GNU Project as a free software replacement for the Bourne shell (sh). Released in 1989, it has been distributed widely as the shell for the GNU operating system and as the default shell on Linux and Mac OS X. It has been ported to Microsoft Windows and distributed with Cygwin and MinGW, to DOS by the DJGPP project, to Novell NetWare and to Android via various terminal emulation applications. Bash is a command processor, typically run in a text window, allowing the user to type commands which cause actions. Bash can also read commands from a file, called a script. Like all Unix shells, it supports filename wildcarding, piping, here documents, command substitution, variables and control structures for condition-testing and iteration. The keywords, syntax and other basic features of the language were all copied from sh. Other features, e.g., history, were copied from csh and ksh. Bash is a POSIX shell but with a number of extensions. The name itself is an acronym, a pun, and a description. As an acronym, it stands for Bourne-again shell, referring to its objective as a free replacement for the Bourne shell. As a pun, it expressed that objective in a phrase that sounds similar to born again, a term for spiritual rebirth.The name is also descriptive of what it did, bashing together the features of sh, csh and ksh. The Bash command syntax is a superset of the Bourne shell command syntax. The vast majority of Bourne shell scripts......

Words: 419 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay


...Shell 1.You will be asked to present the objectives of the organisations of your choice according to what is stated on the websites of the organisations, marketing materials, mission statements, annual reports, etc.; feel free to bring these materials! 2.Find out what type of stakeholder groups the chosen organisation needs to deal with, what would be the most likely order of these groups according to company priorities and why? How would these groups alter the primary objectives of the organisation? 3.Also consider the difference between short-term and long-term objectives the organisation you have chosen has. Imagine yourself being a CEO of the company, what would be your objectives? Then imagine yourself being a member of one of the stakeholder groups, what would be your objectives in that case and why? 1. Our Vision To be the Top Performing and Most Admired Refinery in Asia Our Mission To continuously deliver shareholder value by: •Manufacturing and supplying oil products and services that satisfy the needs of our customers •Constantly achieving operational excellence •Conducting our business in a safe, environmentally sustainable and economically optimum manner •Employing a diverse, innovative and results-oriented team motivated to deliver excellence Our Objectives We are committed to deliver sustainable excellence in business performance by focusing on the following: •Benefit our shareholders •Realise the potential of our people •Meet our......

Words: 2731 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay


...Shell in the Niger Delta: A Framework for Change Five case studies from civil society sponsored by February 2010 About ECCR The Ecumenical Council for Corporate Responsibility (ECCR) is a church-based investor coalition and membership organisation working for economic justice, environmental stewardship, and corporate and investor responsibility. ECCR undertakes research, advocacy and dialogue with companies and investors. It seeks to influence company policy and practice and to raise awareness among the British and Irish churches, the investor community and the general public. For more information, please visit Acknowledgements ECCR would like to thank the five civil society organisations that contributed case studies based on their work in the Niger Delta; Cordaid for generously sponsoring the report; members, partners and independent experts who advised, read and commented on the text before publication; Royal Dutch Shell Plc and Shell Petroleum Development Corporation of Nigeria for providing company information and commenting on the text. Cover photo credits: Friends of the Earth International; IRIN/UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs; Milieudefensie/Friends of the Earth Netherlands; Stakeholder Democracy Network. Disclaimers ECCR has commissioned and published these case studies as a contribution to public understanding. The text has undergone a careful process of fact-checking and review to achieve accuracy and balance.......

Words: 40025 - Pages: 161

Premium Essay


...Shell is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies, operating in more than 145 countries and employing nearly 120,000 people. Shell produces circa 3% of the world's oil and circa 3.5% of the world's gas. Most people know the company for its retail outlets and its oil and natural gas exploration and production activity. Other Shell activities include: * marketing, transporting and trading oil and gas * providing oil products for industrial uses, including fuel and lubricant for ships and aircraft * generating electricity, including wind power and producing solar panels * producing petrochemicals used for plastics, coatings and detergents * developing technology for hydrogen vehicles. Shell considers it a business priority to diversify its business portfolio to include more unconventional fuels in order to meet the worlds increasing demand for energy whilst minimising the impact on the environment. Hence the need for the development of 'future fuels'. At the present time, any company seeking merely to exploit resources for immediate gain and at the expense of the environment or customers' best long-term interests is likely to generate government scrutiny, public hostility, customer resistance and, possibly, prosecution. Like any well-run business, Shell takes a long term view of what constitutes 'best possible use' of the resources available to it. One key challenge facing Shell is how to use its profits and accumulated reserves to promote......

Words: 1468 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay


...seem like unethical, and Royal Dutch Shell Public Limited Company is one of the example. As being a large and profitable company, Shell has started a new Athabasca Oil Sand Project in Alberta. World’s scientific community together with independent non-profit organization believe that this project will make the environment pollution in Alberta being more serious and adversely impact the ecosystem. They are disappointed to the unethical decision of Shell. Therefore, based on this case, the purpose of this research is to discuss the ethics issue that Shell cause and the company performance under its Code of Conduct in this regard. Solutions will be given, including the cost and benefit for the different shareholders. 2. THE CASE 2.1 THE SITUATION AND KEY FACTS Alberta is a province of Canada which is the largest producer of crude oil, natural gas and other gas products. It is active in every area of the oil and gas industry, including exploration, production and refining. Athabasca oil sand is the world largest receptacle of crude bitumen which locates in north eastern of Alberta. This oil sand stores a high quantity of unconventional petroleum which consists of a mixture of bitumen, clay minerals, water together with sand. 2.2 THE KEYSTAKEHOLDERS AND THEIR INVOLVEMENT Stakeholders refer to a person, group, organization or system that can affect and be affected by company decision. Government is one of the key stakeholders for Shell. They are the system by which......

Words: 1558 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay


...Mercier Corporate Report Shell Introduction The reason for this report is to determine rather the company I chose is a good investment for the business. The company I chose is Shell. Shell Refining Company is incorporated in Malaysia. Shell’s fiscal year is from January to December. The stock exchange is reported in financial reporting to review appropriateness of management’s selection of accounting principles. The ticker symbol is expressed as RDS.A. Shell Malaysia places importance in ensuring its cost competitiveness in the industry and to the world. Analysis Name of corporation is Shell Malaysia. The headquarters are located in Malaysia. Shell is a global group of energy and petrochemicals companies around 9000 employees in more than 80 countries and territories. Shell’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. The stock exchange associated with Shell is the main board of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad. Stock name is SHELL and its stock code is 4324. There was no symbol included in the annual report. The primary source of revenue is primarily millions of barrels sold with products. Shell sold 40 million barrels of products with a yield of 8 per cent. Shell had a 29 per cent increase in sales volume which resulted in a year-on-year revenue growth of 15 billion. 4,170 RM billion is the total assets that were reported in 2012 that Shell produced. Cash was reported as 74 RM million in 2012. In 2011, cash was reported as 114 RM million so last year Shell had......

Words: 963 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay


...vast majority of vehicles and as the base of many industrial chemicals makes it one of the world's most important commodities. Access to it was a major factor in several military conflicts, including World War II and the Persian Gulf War. About 80% of the world's readily accessible reserves are located in the Middle East, with 62.5% coming from the Arab 5: Saudi Arabia (12.5%), UAE, Iraq, Qatar and Kuwait. The USA has less than 3% 1.3: Major players 6 The oil industry is often described as having an oligopolistic market structure that is, it is dominated by a small number of big major players, which include Exxon, Mobil, Chevron, BP, and Shell. A slump in oil prices in the late 1990’s resulted in heavy cut backs in staff and operating costs in 1998-99 and merges between BP and Amoco and Exxon and Mobil. 1.4: PEST ANALYSIS OF SHELL COMPANY PEST Analysis is a simple but important and widely-used tool that helps you understand the big picture of the Political, Economic, Socio-Cultural and Technological environment you are operating in. PEST is used by business leaders worldwide to build their vision of the future. OR PEST analysis is very important that an organization considers its environment before beginning the marketing process. In fact, environmental analysis should be continuous and feed all aspects of planning. The organization's marketing environment is made up from: 1. The internal environment e.g. staff (or internal customers), office technology, wages and......

Words: 10567 - Pages: 43

Premium Essay


...ENERGY FOR A CHANGING WORLD Shell – an Introduction Darwin Silalahi Presiden Direktur Shell Indonesia Copyright of Shell International B.V. ABOUT SHELL Recognised for technical innovation and megaproject delivery Employs 90,000 people in more than 80 countries Committed to social and environmental sustainability Producing the equivalent of 2,300 barrels of oil every minute Partners in innovation with Ferrari F1 team Active in alternative energies such as biofuels and wind One of the world’s bestknown brands Selling transport fuel to some 10 million customers a day Copyright of Shell Supply & Distribution RESTRICTED July 2012 2 THE WORLD’S LARGEST CORPORATIONS BY REVENUE Rank 2011 revenues ($ million) 484,489 452,926 2011 profits ($ million) 30,918 41,060 15,699 25,700 9,453 16,317 5,678 26,895 12,436 Shell ExxonMobil Wal-Mart Stores 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 446,950 386,463 375,214 352,338 259,142 245,621 237,272 BP Sinopec Group China National Petroleum State Grid Chevron ConocoPhillips Toyota Motor Source: Fortune Global 500, 2012 Copyright of Shell Supply & Distribution 235,364 3,591 RESTRICTED July 2012 3 THE NEW ENERGY FUTURE BY 2050 Rising energy demand, supply pressure, climate change 9 billion people, 75% living in cities (2 billion more than today) 2 billion vehicles (1 billion at the moment) Many millions of people will rise out of energy poverty; with higher living......

Words: 570 - Pages: 3

Free Essay


...DEDICATION 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 5 Synopsis of Development and Growth of Shell Pakistan 6 Shell Pakistan’s History 6 Vision 6 Values 6 Main objectives 6 Products and services 7 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 8 Ratio Analysis 8 Short Term Debt Paying Ability 8 Profitability Ratios 15 Ratios for Investors 18 Long Term Debt Paying Ability 19 Overall Financial Performance 21 PESTEL ANALYSIS 22 Political Factors 22 Economic Factors 22 Social Factors 23 Technological Factors 23 Ecological Factors 23 Legal Factors 23 SWOT ANALYSIS 24 Strengths 24 Weaknesses 24 Opportunities 25 Threats 25 REFERENCES 26 Synopsis of Development and Growth of Shell Pakistan Shell Pakistan’s History The Shell brand name enjoys a 100-year history in the subcontinent region, dating back to 1899 when Asiatic Petroleum, the far eastern marketing arm of two companies: Shell Transport Company and Royal Dutch Petroleum Company began importing kerosene oil from Azerbaijan into the subcontinent. The documented history of Royal Dutch Shell plc in Indo_Pakistan subcontinent dates back to 1903 when partnership was struck between The Shell Transport & Trading Company and the Royal Dutch Petroleum Company to supply petroleum to Asia. In 1928, to enhance their distribution capabilities, the marketing interest of Royal Dutch Shell plc and the Burmah Oil Company Limited in India were merged and Burmah Shell Oil Storage & Distribution Company of India was born.......

Words: 4804 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Shell and Csr

...stakeholder   attributes   and   class,   Freeman   &   Wicks’   (2007)   conceptualization   of   ‘managing   for   stakeholders’,   and   the   ‘stakeholder   engagement   standard’   provided   by   AccountAbility.   In   order   to   properly   assess   ‘how   Shell   engages   its   stakeholders’,   it   is   necessary   first   to   map   their   most   salient   stakeholders   (as   proposed   by   Mitchell   et.   al.),  and  then  to  assess  how  they  manage  this  engagement  to  create  mutual  benefits   (as   conceptualized   by   Freeman   &   Wicks)   before   comparing   it   to   AccountAbility’s   engagement  standards  to  see  if  anything  can  be  improved.   Shell   has,   in   fact,   outlined   in   detail   who   their   main   stakeholders   are,   and   to   whom   they   conceive   responsibility,   in   ‘The   Shell   General   Business   Principles’   (SGBP).   These   include   Shell’s   shareholders,   customers,   employees,   business   partners   and   society1  thus   following   Freeman   &   Wicks   (2007:   3).   According   to   the   AccountAbility  ......

Words: 2012 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Shell Analysis

...Royal Dutch Shell Introduction and strategic profile of the firm 1. The company and the industry Royal Dutch Shell, commonly known as Shell, is a company incorporated in the United Kingdom, headquartered in the Netherlands, the Anglo-Dutch multinational oil and gas companies. Created by the merger of Royal Dutch Petroleum and UK-based Shell Transport & Trading, which is the largest company in the world. Shell's business is very extensive, including exploration and exploitation of oil and natural gas, petroleum products and chemical products marketing, coal and natural gas production, processing, marketing, power generation business, as well as renewable energy. 2. Overview of firm’s corporate, business, and international strategies Shell operates 10% of the global oil and gas resources for exploration and exploitation in more than 50 countries worldwide and operates in more than 100 countries and regions. The industry of shall is consisted by 14 segments, each operating oil, gas, chemical products, non-ferrous metals, coal and so on, where oil and fossil fuel production and sales capacity ranks second in the world. Shell invests in more than 130 countries, has more than 100,000 employees, and total assets over 100 billion dollars. Today, Shell companies business involve in many countries, more than any other oil groups. The key of Shell's international strategy is that explore gas and oil in about fifty countries, petroleum refining in 34 countries, and the oil...

Words: 1841 - Pages: 8

Free Essay


...1. Shell makes a close relationship with the Nigerian military regime during the early 1990s. The oil company requested an increase in security and provided monetary and logistical support to the Nigerian police. Shell frequently called upon the Nigerian police for “security operations” that often amounted to raids and terror campaigns against the Ogoni. In response to growing Ogoni opposition shell and the Nigerian government coordinated a public relations campaign to discredit the movement, falsely attributing airplane hijackings, kidnapping and other acts of violence to Ken Saro-Wiwa and MOSOP. Shell was involved in the development of the strategy that resulted in the unlawful execution of the Ogoni Nine. Shell told the Nigerian regime they needed to deal with Ken Saro-Wiwa and MOSOP. Shell monitored Ken Saro-Wiwa, and closely followed the tribunal and his detention. Prior to the trial, Shell Nigeria told its parent companies that Saro-Wiwa would be convicted and told witnesses that Saro- Wiwa was never going free. Shell held meetings with the Nigerian regime to discuss the tribunal, including with the military president Sani Abacha himself. Shell's lawyer attended the trial, which, in Nigeria, is a privilege afforded only to interested parties. Brian Anderson, the Managing Director of Shell’s Nigerian subsidiary, met with Owens Wiwa, Saro-Wiwa’s brother and offered to trade Saro-Wiwa’s freedom for an end to the protests against the company. At least two witnesses who......

Words: 610 - Pages: 3

Free Essay


...Social Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp 70-82, August 2012. URL: ISSN: 2235 -767X IMPACT OF EMPLOYEES SAFETY CULTURE ON ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE IN SHELL BONNY TERMINAL INTEGRATED PROJECT (BTIP) Dr. M.O. Agwu, MNIM, MNISP Department of Business Administration, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State ABSTRACT he paper focuses on the impact of employees’ safety culture on organizational performance (improved management/employees safety practices, enhanced productivity, increased profitability and reduced accident/ incident rate) in shell bonny terminal integrated project. It defines employees’ safety culture as a product of individual and group values, attitudes, perceptions, competencies, and patterns of behavior that determine the level of commitment, style and proficiency of an organization’s safety management system. It assumes that inculcation of employees’ safety culture on the workforce at the task level using behavior-based safety culture approach (enforcement and education) has an influence on employees’ safety performance as well as on company performance: enhancement of productivity, profitability and loss control through reduction of accident/incident rate. The paper posits that: if construction companies in Shell Bonny terminal integrated project (BTIP) inculcate safety culture in their workforce through changing employees’ attitude to safety, there will be an improvement in......

Words: 5343 - Pages: 22

Free Essay

Shell Intro

...Shell is an Anglo–Dutch multinational oil and gas company incorporated in the United Kingdom and headquartered in the Netherlands. Created by the merger of Royal Dutch Petroleum and UK-based Shell Transport & Trading in 1907. By 2011, they became the second largest company in relation to revenue, growth and profitability in the oil and gas sector (Bruijn et al, 2002). The company operates in all areas of oil and gas industry, these areas include exploration of oil and gas, supplies and distribution, marketing, production, refinery, petrochemical development and power generation (McIntosh, 2001). The company is also concerned about environmental conservation, and it has invested heavily on the production, and distribution of renewable energy (Carroll, 1999). It supports initiatives of developing and distribution bio-fuel energy, wind and solar power, and hydrogen energy. The oil boom of the early 1920s, particularly at Shell’s Signal Hill, California site, provided the company with an opportunity to penetrate the Los Angeles area with sales of Shell gasoline and petroleum products manufactured in its new refineries nearby. In 1922, Shell Company of California and Roxana Petroleum merged with Union Oil Company of Delaware to form a holding company called Shell Union Oil Corporation. Approximately 65 percent of the holding company’s shares was held by Royal Dutch/Shell Group. Upon developing the ability to synthesize 100-octane gasoline, Shell began supplying this fuel to the U...

Words: 907 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay


...Holland’s biggest profitable organization Evaluative Report Preface In front of you lies an evaluation report about the biggest profitable Dutch company, Shell. Via this report we want to show you how Shell is performing at this moment and how they stay at the top of their segment. The reason for writing this report is to give an insight into what Shell does, we all know them from their gas stations but Shell does much more and tries to be innovative by looking for new and improved energy sources all around the world. Besides that we choose Shell because of its Dutch background and the fact that they are recognized all over the world. Briefly said, Shell is the biggest company in The Netherlands and via this report we´ll try to unfold how they manage to perform this well and what the secret is to their success. Bergen op Zoom, Noord – Brabant May 31st , 2011 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. General description of Shell 2 2.1 History of the organization 2 2.2 Products and Services 3 2.3 Operations 3 2.4 Financial Situation 4 2.5 Legal Aspects 4 2.6 Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility 5 2.6.1 Corporate Governance 5 2.6.2 Social Responsibility 5 3. Organization Environment 6 3.1 Relevant market 6 3.2 Supply chain 6 3.3 Shareholders 6 3.4 Relevant Macro Factors and Business Trends 7 3.5 Competition in Particular 7 4. Organization Goals and Strategies 9 4.1 Mission and Vision 9 4.1.1 Mission 9 4.1.2 Vision 9 4.2...

Words: 9120 - Pages: 37

Sally4Ever - Saison 1 [COMPLETE] (Ajout de l'Episode : 7) (HDTV) | wireless télécommande cr souris jouet pour chat électronique de rat souris ZMIE | Hand Tools