Premium Essay

Specialty Toy, Inc.

In: Business and Management

Submitted By specialk5025
Words 2326
Pages 10
MBA: 633 sTATISTICS FOR BUSINESS DECISION MAKING | Specialty Toys, Inc. | Case Problem: Group Assignment No. 1 | | March 4, 2010 | |

[Managerial Report prepared to address issues and recommend and order quantity for the Weather Teddy product for Specialty Toys, Inc.] |

Executive Summary
Specialty Toys, Inc. is a manufacturer of new and innovative children’s toys which includes the Weather Teddy. The Weather Teddy has a built-in barometer that provides one of five standard responses about the weather when a child presses the teddy bear’s hand. The company recently reached out to our team to prepare a managerial report addressing, but not limited to, the following issues: normal probability distribution in relation to demand approximation, the probability of stock-outs for certain quantities and the projected profits associated with certain order quantities. The purpose of this managerial report is to address the concerns of the management team at Specialty Toys, Inc. and also to provide a recommended order quantity for the Weather Teddy, the probability of stock-outs related to specific order quantities, and the potential profits associated with certain order quantities.
Specialty Toys Business Cycle
The company sells a variety of toys throughout the year. However, Specialty Toys plans to release the Weather Teddy in October, before the holiday season is officially underway. Management has determined that this is the best time to release a holiday gift because many families have already begun shopping for holiday gifts at this time. In order to have the Weather Teddy on the shelf by October, the company must place a one-time order with its manufacturer in either June or July. Due to the large gap between when orders are placed and actual products are produced, the most important question the company faces is determining the correct number of…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Case: Fisher-Price Toys, Inc.

...Case: Fisher-Price Toys, Inc. 1. Basic information 1) Company: Fisher-Price Toys, Inc. (Industry: Child toys) 2) Business dilemma: a rash marketing decision has to be made on carrying out whether a new quality product (product name: ATV Explorer) at exceptional high price or a new less-quality product at moderate price 2. Business dilemma 1) Key problem: 1) price-point: Cost for a projected toy can't be made within budget, resulting in a much higher price ($18.5) than planned. High price disobeys the traditional brand image of the Fisher-Price company –less-than-$5 convention. 2) Marketing strategy: launch the ATV explorer whether as an independent product or as a new product in an existing product line, and corresponding advertising/promotion strategy 2) Fisher-Price must decide quickly before August to catch the sale peak: 1) trade-off between product quality and price; 2) Independence of the product 3. Case analysis 1) Current Market strategy (“4P” / “4C”) 1) Product → Commodity: innovative products / safe, durable and educational 2) Price → Cost: moderate price / good value for money 3) Place → Channel: Aggressive to increase the market reach and improve sales 4) Promotion → Communication: focused strategies for advertisement and promotion of differentiated range and group of products 2) SWOT analysis 1) Strengths (Internal) 1- Internal operation ...

Words: 1032 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Accounting for Fuzzy Dice Inc. Acquisition of Tiny Tots Toys Llc

...ISSUE: Accounting for Fuzzy Dice Inc. acquisition of Tiny Tots Toys LLC related to decision (1) to use purchased facility to enter another business line or (2) renovate the facility to expand the current production. BRIEF BACKGROUND OF COMPANY Fuzzy Dice Inc. (“Fuzzy” or “the Company”) manufactures novelty items that it distributes to wholesalers and large online and direct-mail retailers. Fuzzy operates in an area where several other light manufacturers operate, one of which is Tiny Tots Toys LLC (“Tiny”), an educational children’s toy manufacturer. Tiny has been unable to turn a profit for the past few years and has recently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Tiny’s primary asset is its manufacturing facility. The location and capabilities of this facility are the key reasons why it represents an acquisition target to Fuzzy. However, Fuzzy is undecided on how it should use Tiny’s factory after the acquisition. The Company will either (1) continue to use the facility to manufacture children’s toys and enter another business line alongside its novelty business or (2) renovate the factory in order to expand its novelty item production capacity to grow its current business. Since the acquisition will be structured as an asset purchase rather than a stock purchase, Fuzzy will not assume the employment relationships with the Tiny employees. In both scenarios, Fuzzy expects to hire all the current Tiny employees; however, the Company believes its current workforce......

Words: 1696 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Toys, Inc.

...case, religion. Mr. Jones could not work on Sunday due to his religious beliefs. This, in turn, will be seen as an act of forcing an employee to make a decision based on his/her religious beliefs. In the case of Turner v. Anheuser-Bush, Inc., the employee actually quit, but the constructive discharge was actually viewed as termination. Also, in the case of Valdez v. City of Los Angeles, “whether conditions were so intolerable as to justify a reasonable employee’s decision to resign is normally a question of fact.” We do not want the court to believe we forced Mr. Jones to resign due to religion. Additionally, in the case of Dr. Sammie E. Harris v. Detroit Public Schools, we do not want the court to access taxable costs associated with a trial if we can prevent the trial from occurring. My recommendation is to offer Mr. Jones a comparable position within the company if at all possible. We do have office staff positions that do not work on Sundays. This may be an option. We do not want to sit idly by and do nothing; it may be detrimental to our company. Reference List Gomez-Mejia, L., Balkin, D., & Cardy, R. (2010). Managing Human Resources, Sixth Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Tuner v. Anheuser-Bush, Inc. (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1238, 1244-1245 [32 Cal.Rptr.2d 223, 876 P.2d 1022]. Valdez v. City of Los Angeles. (1994) 231 Cal.App.3d 1043, 1056 [282 Cal.Rptr. 726]. Mourad v. Automobile Club Ins Ass’n (1991) 186 Mich App 715, 721; 465......

Words: 415 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Toys

... Jennifer Smith G.G. Toys: Case study #2 G.G. Toys was a toy manufacturer facing problems with productivity and profitability. The company found a profitable product in their Geoffrey doll and Specialty branded doll #106. Retailers could customize to the specifications and buying habits of their customer base. On average, the Geoffrey Doll cost $19.19 to produce, and the #106 doll $23.74. To access in a study of their overhead cost for both of their plants, research showed that: 1. A setup was performed in the Chicago facility each time a modification to the dolls was made. Additionally, each time a specialty-branded doll was produced, a separate setup was required to process the raw materials to the required specifications. 2. Workers in the Chicago facility often operated several machines simultaneously once they were set up. Thus, machine-related expenses might relate more to the machine hours of a product than to its production-run labor hours. Because each retailer required slight alterations to the Geoffrey doll's overall appearance, a new setup and production run was required for each design change. Retailers were found to be conservative in their ordering patterns, ordering fewer units more frequently. Thus increasing the number of setups required, causing increased labor and material cost. The research done by the external group did show an area of opportunity. Because setup is time consuming, labor intensive, and costly, it would be within reason (at......

Words: 430 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Toys City Inc.

...LGT 3105 Operation Management – Case Assignment 1 (Toys City Inc.) 1. I would have accommodated David Cheung’s vacation request. It is because based on the Critical Path Method (CPM), the network diagram of the work of different audit areas comes as Figure 1, and we can find that the critical path which is the series of activities using the longest time to complete is Activity 1-2-5-7-10-13-15. It means that if there is any delay on Activity 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 13, 15, the whole project would be delayed also. However, David is only responsible on the auditing of liquid assets which is Activity 4 which is not in the critical path. The vacation or delay made by David would not affect the progress of the whole project. Moreover, by calculating the early start/finish and late start/finish schedule, we find out the slack time which is the available delaying time of the activity without delaying the whole project (Late start time-Early start time= Late finish time-Early finish time). The slack time of Activity 4 is 125 hours (178-53 = 213-88) which means that the maximum time I would be comfortable giving David off is 125 hours. It is much greater that David’s requested vacation time which is 40 audit hours; therefore, I would allow his vacation request. [pic]Figure 1 2. Before setting up the accelerating plan, we should know about the crash time and the crash cost. Crash time refers to the minimum time used to work on those activities......

Words: 1217 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Toy World Inc

...TOY WORLD INC, CASE Issues * To change Toy World´s production processes, from seasonal to even monthly production, * cThe arrangement of getting the loan for the bank and how it will be secured by the account receivable and inventory * Toy World is facing several challenges related to its equipment usage and availability, leading to high overhead costs under Seasonal production Inputs * Expected sales for 1994 is $1000000 * 200000 is the minimum cash balance * A loan of $752000 was outstanding at the end of 93, the bank is willing to extand the credit line up to $2million, it will be secured by the account receivable and inventory * Collecting period of account receivables is 60 days * Under the seasonal production cost of goods sold would be 70% of sales , under the level production cost of good sold would be 65.1% of sales . * Under the level production storage and handling cost will increase by $115000, it will be included in operating expenses. Solution Production Cost |   | Inventorized production |   | balance of enventore at the end of month |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 586 | 542.5 |   | $464.38 |   | $1,050.38 | 542.5 |   | $451.36 |   | $1,501.74 | 542.5 |   | $438.34 |   | $1,940.08 | 542.5 |   | $451.36 |   | $2,391.44 | 542.5 |   | $451.36 |   | $2,842.80 | 542.5 |   | $451.36 |   | $3,294.16 | 542.5 |   | $438.34 |   | $3,732.50 | 542.5 |   | -$512.12 |   | $3,220.38 | 542.5 |...

Words: 910 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Toy World Inc.

...Toy World, Inc. is a company that manufactures plastic toys for children. It creates toys of many different areas including toy cars, trucks, construction equipment, rockets, spaceships, animals, rockets, etc. The company as a whole has been doing quite well since it opened in 1990 and has experience profitability since early 1993. Although they have been doing satisfactory, there is always room for improvement. They are currently pondering the idea of switching their scheduling production from seasonal to a more level production. It is believed that by switching it will save the company substantial amount of funds and help reserve its factory equipment. Also, they are and need to find a solution to the current loan agreement they have with their bank to coincide with this new plan. Adopting a policy of level monthly production was the idea of Toy World Inc.’s Production manager, Mr. Hoffman. He has stated multiple issues with the current production schedule and exclaimed projected ideas & results with the new level policy. Current problems arising from the seasonal production schedule include overtime premiums reducing profits, seasonal expansion and contraction of the work force resulted in recruiting difficulties and high training/quality costs, machinery was idle for months at a time and subjected to heavy use, frequent set up changes in the machinery, confusion in scheduling runs, and frequent setup changes that resulted in inefficiencies in assembly and......

Words: 771 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Fisher-Price Toys, Inc

...Fisher-Price Toys, Inc. Fisher-Price, a toy company that was founded in 1930, was known for its durable, safe, high-quality, and fun products sold at low to moderate prices, and had established itself as a leading producer of toys over the years. In fact, 82.7% of participants in a Redbook study named Fisher-Price the brand of pre-school toys that they buy the most often. In the summer of 1970, marketing vice president Jack Asthalter found himself confronted with a difficult decision: whether to produce a new ATV Explorer toy. Ashalter’s production staff had just informed him that the ATV Explorer could no longer be profitably distributed at the preconceived price of $12, and would need to be sold at a price of $18.50 after markups. Asthalter was unsure whether there would be sufficient demand for the ATV at this new price, as all concept tests and market research sessions had been conducted with the idea that the ATV Explorer would be sold at a retail price of $12. Additionally, because most of Fisher-Price’s toys were priced below $5, internal opposition would need to be overcome in order to manufacture the toy. Ashalter had several options: produce the ATV Explorer and sell it at $18.50; lower the price by removing a part but in the process sacrifice quality, going against traditional company policy; market and advertise the ATV Explorer as a single item rather than as part of a line of toys; milk the ATV Explorer and increase the price by $.50 or a $1 and use the......

Words: 600 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Case Analysis – Specialty Toys

...Case Analysis – Specialty Toys 1. Senior sales forecaster predicted and expected demand of 20,000 units with .95 probability that demand would be between 10,000 and 30,000 units. P (10,000 < x< 30,000) = .95 (30,000-20,000)/1.96 = 5,102 X = the demand of Weather Teddy Mean µ = 20,000 Standard Deviation α = 5,102 The normal distribution of the demand for the Weather Teddy is represented in the graph below. This is based off of the forecast of previous selling history of other similar toys. The forecast shows that the demand for the Weather Teddy will be at 20,000 units, but with a probability of .95 of selling anywhere between 10k to 20k units. Therefore, with the information given the standard deviation of this forecast is at 5,102. 2. With various order quantities suggested by members of the management team, it would be wise to compute the probability of a stock-out for each of the order quantities suggested. The probability of a stock-out is the inverse of the probability that the quantity sold is less than or equal to the amount purchased by the company. 1st Formula used: z = (x - µ) / σ The probability of a stock out is calculated by subtracting the probability found in the chart from 1. Suggested Quantity to Order | Probability of a Stock-Out | 15,000 | 83.65% | 18,000 | 65.17% | 24,000 | 21.77% | 28,000 | 5.82% | 3. Based on the various order quantities suggested by members of the management team, a simple profit analysis...

Words: 914 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Toy Worl, Inc.

...Solution to Toy World, Inc. Case 32A Toy World, Inc. Cash Budgeting Copyright ( 1996 by the Dryden Press. All rights reserved. CASE INFORMATION PURPOSE This case analyzes a straightforward cash budgeting problem. It is designed to illustrate the mechanics of a cash budget and the way cash budgets are used. Discussion questions focus on the rationale behind the use of cash budgets as well as on their inherent problems. The case also raises the issues of the target cash balance, the optimal size of the credit line, the investment of excess cash, and production scheduling for a seasonal business. TIME REQUIRED Without using the model, 3-4 hours of student preparation should be adequate for most students, with possibly another hour or so to write up the case if it must be handed in. Use of the spreadsheet model can greatly reduce preparation time, especially if the completed model or the easy macro version is given to students. COMPLEXITY A relatively simple, but with a fair amount of number crunching for students not using the spreadsheet model. However, a number of related issues can be discussed, so students can put in a significant amount of time on the case. Still, they can get the gist of it without too much trouble. WAYS WE HAVE USED THE CASE We have used this case in two very different ways. First, with both introductory and not very-well-prepared second course students, we ask them to read the case and to become......

Words: 4592 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Specialty Toys

...Case Study 1: Specialty Toys | Group 10 | Amy GarlitzAlison MalzahnRudy RodelasAngad SinghAbigail Webber | Question 1 The data of the sales of the Weather Teddy presented in the Specialty Toys case has a normal probability distribution. The company has a 95% probability of demand for the Weather Teddy being between 10,000 and 30,000 units. Therefore, 95% of the data is within two standard deviations of the mean. The standard deviation is 5,000, or the data deviates from the mean by 5,000 units. The graph below presents this probability distribution for the sales demand of the new product based on the sales forecast. Question 2 The managers of Specialty Toys had identified the suggested order quantities of 15,000, 18,000, 24,000 and 28,000 as noted on Chart A. The order quantities 10,000, 20,000 and 26,000 are included as further analysis for purposes of answering question 5. The out of stock probabilities for each possible order quantity are determined by converting the data to the standard normal random variable or z-score. The z-score is a function of the mean and standard deviation as noted in the formula z = (x-μ)/σ. The second column of Chart A calculates the numerator of the equation and the third column calculates the z-score. Once the z-scores have been calculated, the probabilities are determined by using the standard normal probability table. With an order quantity of 15,000 the z-value probability from the table is .1587 or rounded to .159. This...

Words: 2071 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Toys World Inc.

... Student Name: Shunde Tu Student ID: 000196745 Course: MGT 121( Financial Management II) Case Study on Toy World I. Situation Audit a) Plastic Toys Manufacturing Industry Overview i. Highly seasonal, with a majority of sale volume generated between Aug. and Nov. ii. Competitive landscape 1. Highly competitive, populated by a large number of companies 2. Fierce design and price competition, with short product lives and a relatively high rate of company failures 3. Low entry barrier resulted from low capital and technology requirements. 4. Influx of imported toys intensified competitive pressure on smaller firms. b) Company Overview The company studied in the case is Toy World, a manufacturer of plastic toys for children. More than 80% of the sale was generated between Aug to Nov. Toy World Inc.’s practice was to produce in response to customer orders. Therefore, the production was highly seasonal, and not more than 25%-30% of manufacturing capacity was used for the first seven months. c) Product Overview i. Produce a wide range of designs, colors and sizes for most of its product categories. ii. Dollar sales of a particular product had sometimes varied by 30%-35% from one year to the next. II. Problem Statement The company’s production had been scheduled to accommodate the seasonality of sales. The production manager proposed to adopt level production to reduce labor costs. The......

Words: 959 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Specialty Toys Case Study

...Specialty Toys Case Study 1. The mean is 20,000 units and there is a 95% probability that demand will be between 10, 000 and 30,000 units. This means there is a .025% chance that the demand will be outside of 10,000 and 30,000. Using the chart, we find that z=-1.96. Using the following calculation, we find: z= x- μ σ -1.96 = 10,000 – 20,000 σ σ=5102 Standard deviation σ = 5,102 μ = 20,000 mean 2. Stock outs were calculated by the four management numbers. Equation is: z = (x – μ)/ σ 15,000: Z = (15,000-20,000)/5102 z = -0.98 Then, reference the cumulative probabilities for standard deviation table in the beginning of the book to identify what -0.98 represents, which is .1635. Since stock outs are any quantity greater than what management suggested, they need to be subtracted from 1. 1 - .1635 = .8365 which = 83.65% Same logic/steps for the rest of the values: 18,000 24,000 28,000 Z = (18,000-20,000)/5102 z=(24,000-20,000)/5102 z=(28,000-20,000)/5102 z = -.39 z=.78 z= 1.57 1 - .3483 = .6517 1 - .7823 = .2177 ...

Words: 1198 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Specialty Toys

...Specialty Toys Case Study 1. The mean is 20,000 units and there is a 95% probability that demand will be between 10, 000 and 30,000 units. This means there is a .025% chance that the demand will be outside of 10,000 and 30,000. Using the chart, we find that z=-1.96. Using the following calculation, we find: z= x- μ σ -1.96 = 10,000 – 20,000 σ σ=5102 Standard deviation σ = 5,102 μ = 20,000 mean 2. Stock outs were calculated by the four management numbers. Equation is: z = (x – μ)/ σ 15,000: Z = (15,000-20,000)/5102 z = -0.98 Then, reference the cumulative probabilities for standard deviation table in the beginning of the book to identify what -0.98 represents, which is .1635. Since stock outs are any quantity greater than what management suggested, they need to be subtracted from 1. 1 - .1635 = .8365 which = 83.65% Same logic/steps for the rest of the values: 18,000 24,000 28,000 Z = (18,000-20,000)/5102 z=(24,000-20,000)/5102 z=(28,000-20,000)/5102 z = -.39 z=.78 z= 1.57 1 - .3483 = .6517 1 - .7823 = .2177 1 –.9418 = .0582 which = 65.17% which = 21.77% which = 5.82% 3. Projected Profit for management under three scenarios which are 10,000 20,000 and 30,000 units Order | 10,000 units | 20,000 units | 30,000 units | 15000 | 8*10000-11*5000 =$25000 | 8*15000=$120000 | 8*15000 = $120000 | 18000 | 8*10000-11*8000= $-8000 | 8*18000 = $144000 | 8*18000 = $144000 | 24000 | 8*10000-11*14000= -74000......

Words: 276 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Case 13: Southeastern Specialty, Inc.

...Elizabeth Vo HADM 564 April 16, 2012 Case 13: Southeastern Specialty, Inc. Financial Risk (1, 2, 3, 4, & 6) 1. Is the return on the one-year T-bill risk free? No, the return on the one-year T-bill is not risk free. Financial risk is related to the probability of earning a return less than expected and the larger the chance of earning a return far below that expected, the greater the amount of financial risk. Risk free assumes 100% probability that the investment will earn the total percent of return that is expected. 2. Calculate the expected rate of return on each of the five investment alternatives listed in Exhibit 13.1. Based solely on expected returns, which of the potential investments appear best? Based on the expected returns, the potential investment that appears the best is 15% with S & P 500 Fund. (Probability of Return 1 x Return 1) + (Probability of Return 2 x Rate 2) = Expected Rate of Return 1-Year T-Bill (0.10 x .07) + (0.20 x .07) + (0.40 x .07) + (0.20 x .07) + (0.10 x .07) = .07 = 7% Project A (0.10 x [-.08]) + (0.20 x .02) + (0.40 x .14) + (0.20 x .25) + (0.10 x .33) = .135 = 13.5% Project B (0.10 x .18) + (0.20 x .23) + (0.40 x .07) + (0.20 x [-.03]) + (0.10 x .02) = .088 = 8.8% S & P 500 Fund (0.10 x [-.15]) + (0.20 x 0) + (0.40 x .15) + (0.20 x .30) + (0.10 x .45) = .15 = 15% Equity in SSI (0.10 x 0) + (0.20 x .05) + (0.40 x .10) + (0.20 x .15) + (0.10 x .20) = .10 = 10% 3. Now......

Words: 1706 - Pages: 7

ball gown | Robert Blitzer | XXX HARDCORE DVDRIP/BDRIP