Premium Essay

The Pentagon’s New Map: It Explains Why We’re Going to War and Why We’ll Keep Going to War

In: Social Issues

Submitted By jdpick10
Words 639
Pages 3

The reason Barnett supports going to war in Iraq is not simply that Saddam is a cutthroat Stalinist willing to kill anyone to stay in power, nor because that regime has clearly supported terrorist networks over the years. The real reason he supports a war like this is that the resulting long-term military commitment will finally force America to deal with the entire Gap as a strategic environment. The primary division in the world today, he says, is between two sets countries that he calls the Core and the Gap. The Core consists of advanced countries that play by the rules and are committed to globalization (primarily Europe, North America, and Japan) plus countries that are committed to getting there (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and some others). This is a form of shrinking the gap aka promote globalization.

The less connected to globalization, the greater the chance is for U.S. military response.

However, the Middle East is ripe for change, a stronger “bully” could push it forward.

Focusing America’s military might in the Gap will set the conditions for globalization of nations in the region. Our presence in Japan and Western Europe generated extremely successful Core states.

The Gap is everyone else: a collection of disconnected, lawless, and dangerous countries such as
Colombia, Pakistan, and North Korea, plus most of the Middle East and Africa. American military action since World War II has been confined almost exclusively to the Gap, which means the task of the United States over the next several decades — and in particular the task of the United States military — is to shrink the Gap and eventually convert the entire world to the values of the Core. Only then will America and the rest of the current Core be safe. Regions not connected to globalization present the greatest threat to the United…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Why Men Love War

...William Broyles, Jr.: Why Men Love War (1984) ● In what way do the veterans feel a certain ambivalence towards the war, according to Broyles? In one way, the soldiers is raised in the believe that war is a horrible thing you and you can’t like such things. In another way, the men loved being in war. It’s gives them an intoxication, that they can’t have any other way. ● How does he portray the life of a Vietnam veteran? Invariably filled with boozy awkwardness, forced camaraderie ending in sadness and tears. ● Explain and comment on the following statement: "There were no metaphors that connected the war to everyday life." (p. 130). Vietnam veteran why talk about everyday life it makes absolutely no sense when you’ve been in war and you’ve experienced so many things and you can’t connect war and everyday life, the difference is too big. ● Explain and comment on the following sentence: "War is the enduring condition of man …" (p. 131). It is a male instinct to experience war at some point in his life. The text says; “There is a reason for every war and a war for every reason.” There is always an excuse for war. ● How does Broyles characterise himself? Why does he miss the war at some points? Djdj ● Sum up the reasons Broyles gives for why men love war. In this connection, comment on the statements below. Find more statements that explain why men love war and comment on them:    ◦ War is an escape from the everyday (p. 133)    ◦ War is a game (p.......

Words: 533 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Going to War

...Going To War Com/156 Going To War In today’s world there are many wars and rumors of wars. No matter where we turn we are hearing about one conflict or another. Often it make one wonder has there ever been peace in the world. Looking back on history our world has constantly moved from one war to the next. Trying to understand why it is that mankind feels the need to fight one another is not simple to answer. Many reasons have been given as to why war are started everything from religion, expansionism, ethnic cleansing and even in the name of peace itself. No matter what the reason is that people claim to be fighting for when you get down to the basic of it all. In the end people go to war for power and control, even when the purpose or perception to do so suggests otherwise. To better understand the reason wars are started we need first talk about why people go to war. Matthew O. Jackson and Massimo Morelli wrote (when researching for the book “The Handbook on the Political Economy of War.”) a list of the reason why people go to war. They included the following: religion, revenge, ethnic cleansing and other ideological mass killings, asymmetric information, bargaining failures, first strike advantages and preemptive war. (2009, The Reasons for Wars – an Updated Survey). As complete as this list was I found that often the reason for war was not simply one of the above topics. Often those declaring the wars would use multiple reasons as for the need. This......

Words: 1869 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

The Pentagon's New Map: It Explains Why We'Re Going to War and Why We'Ll Keep Going to War

...First, the world is essentially divided up into two parts, the Gap and the Core. The Gap is essentially the Third World, and the Core is the first world and those countries that either due to size, military capabilities, or growing economic impact is on its way to joining the Core. This latter sub-group are led by the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa). The author explains that the key difference between the Gap and the Core is the plenitude of choices offered to their denizens. Those living in the Core are offered a greater and better range of choices due to their enhanced connectivity with each other and with the world. Likewise those in the Gap do not have such an offering of choices; either due to official censorship, lack of infrastructure or insufficient education. Second, the author argues that it is the lack of choices and lack of connectivity in the Gap that drives much of the world's major problems, such as terrorism, religious fundamentalism, civil conflicts, and the international black market in weapons, drugs and people. And from this logic, it is the Gap where these large problems originate. Third, the author argues that the USA, being the lone superpower left in the world, should make a earnest, comprehensive and all-consuming effort to "shrink the Gap" in the words of the author. Methods recommended by the author to shrink the Gap include establishment of trade treaties to expand international trade, foreign investment, preemptive military......

Words: 256 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Letter Reply to Granpda for Not Going to Vietnam War

...GRANDPA Dear grandpa, I am so happy when I got your letter, I haven’t heard from you for quite a long time, I miss you so much. We are doing great, hope you are the same grandpa. I have read your opinions about the Vietnam War and I have some serious discussion about this. I hope you will understand my perspectives and not forcing me to be conscripted to go to fight in Vietnam. To start with, as you know that South Vietnam seemed to be under attack from communism, with its political, economic and social implications therefore it requested for USA and Australia’s supports. Moreover, we were willing to help because we don’t more countries to become communist like a domino effect and it might affect our country’s policies. Grandpa, do you get why did Australia even agree to become involved? It’s such a bad idea. Australia fight in Vietnam because our biggest ally – USA did and we want to make sure they stay bound to us if we need them to help us in the future (in addition as we formed ANZUS that means alliances have to help each other’s). However, in this case fighting is not a good choice because it will have bad effects on the relationships and in general of those countries. One of the reasons is Vietnam didn’t do anything to us, as if declaimed war or anything that require us to fight, to protect our homes; this case they just want to be communist. Australia was sort of got influenced by the America. I think Vietnam has the right to choose between capitalism and......

Words: 1230 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Pentagon's New Map

...that the United States must promote connectivity with the Gap, in what he calls “shrinking the gap”, by exporting security conducive to globalization. Barnett believes that the United States must lead this effort because it is ideally suited to do so, as the United States is “connectivity personified” and has the military and economic strength to promote security. Barnett also believes that the United States’ military engagement in the Gap is the only way to protect it from national security threats found in the Gap. Part 2. Author’s main arguments Barnett begins the support of his thesis by mapping the current international... Clearly MR Barnett to global terrorists.” Thomas P.M. Barnett, “The Pentagon’s New Map—It Explains Why We’re Going to War, and Why We’ll Keep Going to War,” Esquire (March 2003), 97. Barnett asserts that it is the disconnected nations of the Gap that pose a national security threat to the United States because these nations will eventually migrate their problems to those countries enjoying globalization's connectivity. This "gap" thesis misses one critical element---that of religion or the absence of it. Virtually all of this "gap" zone is in Islamic hands, save parts of Africa and parts of Central America that the "liberation theology" Catholics convinced to be socialist. What can we notice about his "gap?" It is overwhelmingly (again, Central Am. excepted) non-Christian. For years, Pat Robertson and others have called this the "10/40......

Words: 703 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Globalization Is Going Into Reverse

...Topic: Why Globalization Is Going Into Reverse Date: November 25, 2013 Source: Summary of the news item Study showed that cross-border investment and trade flows declined worldwide in 2012 and weak economic conditions were partly to blame for the downturn. The article revealed that the largest threat to globalization comes from policy fumbles rather than macroeconomics fundamentals. These fumbles are an increased of protectionist measures of more than 2,000 was enacted by national governments and the failure of multinational companies to capitalize on growth in emerging markets. It revealed that trade and investment flows would rise if multinational corporations would learn to crack the code for competing in emerging economies where growth is strongest. The 100 largest companies headquartered in advanced economies derived only 17 percent of their revenues from emerging markets in 2010, even though those markets are projected to contribute more than 70 percent of global economic growth through 2025, The article analyzes data on trade and other indicators to gauge what they term the “depth of globalization.” 1. Trade and investment flows, after increasing robustly until 2007, dropped sharply during the 2008-09 crisis, then started rising again in 2010 and 2011. 2. In 2012, the dollar value of foreign direct investment inflows worldwide dropped 21 percent, while trade in merchandise declined slightly, and trade in services was......

Words: 538 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Explain Why Civil War Broke Out in China in 1946

...Explain why civil war broke out in China in 1946 to 1949 The nationalists began the Guomindang offensive against the communists in Manchuria, 1946. This was to be the start of bloody civil war that would last for three years, until the communists assumed their victory in october of 1949 and Chiang fled to Taiwan. One key factor in the reason for the civil war were the conflicting ideologies between the communists and the nationalists. They did not agree on any matter regarding China and their opinions on the policies and methods to improve China were very different from the other. These differences prevented both parties from coexisting peacefully. Whenever peace was negotiated, one party would attempt to alter it or simply disregard the terms, so peace was impossible to achieve. The Guomindang, for example, was supported by business men and landlords and aimed for a capitalist, private enterprising system in China. The communists however, aimed for a revolutionary overthrow of the regime and to confiscate all the land from the landowners and businessmen and to create an equal, classless society where all the land and business was shared by all the people. The Communists and Nationalists shared a very turbulent past. There had been existing tensions between both parties for many years now, and the tensions were only increasing. Years upon years of conflict and rivalry between the Nationalists and Communists had left a legacy of mistrust and suspicion between them.......

Words: 903 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Who Started the Cold War and Why?

...Who started the cold war and why? The Cold War was started by the principal victors of World War II: the United States of America, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and to a lesser extent Britain. The Cold War was essentially an ideological struggle which but soon adopted all facets of full international conflict with its geopolitical, economic and also scientific-technological aspects. The earliest stages of the Cold War coincided with the final defeats of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan in the first half of 1945. Both Communists and Capitalists were anxious to fill the power vacuums that the defeated Axis powers were leaving behind in Central Europe and the Pacific. From the setting of the scene at Yalta in February 1945, to the embittered conclusion of the Warsaw Pact on 14th May 1955, the worst obstacle to achieving a peace settlement was a mutual and deep-seated sense of suspicion, which the powers on either side of the 'Iron Curtain' must be held responsible for. "Twenty years ago I strove with all the energy in my power against Communism, because at that time I considered Communism, with its idea of world revolution, the greatest danger to the British Empire ... Nowadays German Nazism, with its idea of the world hegemony of Berlin, constitutes the greatest danger for the British Empire ... If the danger for the British Empire from the side of Fascism were to disappear and the danger from the side of Communism were to rise again, I - I say this......

Words: 1219 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Cola Wars - Going Global

...COLA WARS: GOING GLOBAL 1. Reading synthesis The Harvard Review article discuss how the 2 most successful cola companies, Coca Cola and Pepsico, had been struggling in the market since they started their operations. The interesting part is how it explained how each one of the companies developed their market in different countries. In this case, it explained the companies history in Mexico, China and India. What I think is more important to understand is that each country has different cultural ideas that affect the companies development among its consumers. For example, in India they had problems with its formula, in China people identify light colored beverages to be healthier and in Mexico first they had price control problems. Another interesting point is that Pepsico has a variety of not only beverages but also their snacks part it’s pretty strong. 2. References: Investigate two references and indicate how they relate to the main argument of the reading. • Andrew Martin, “Does Coke Need A Refill?”; New York Times; May 27 2007; p,C1 The article talks about how Coca Cola’s campaign gets the company to where it is today, they in vested millions on advertising. Also it talks about Coca Cola’s new products and how they achieved even higher sales for the company. IT also explains how the trajectory of Coca Cola made the company that we know today. • “PepsiCo to Spend $1B in China Over Next Four Year,” Yahoo! Finance; November......

Words: 595 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why War Is Bad?

...from the 21st century, my first and quick answer will be war Wars have been going on for centuries. War unavoidably.Brings death, destruction and suffering, which both ruin lives and nations. The most unjustifiable consequence of war is the loss of innocent civilians' lives. Civilians, who could have lived to make a huge impact on the world, pose no direct threat to the 'enemy' and might not even share the motives of the side they have been presumed to support. War eradicates hopes and dreams of millions, destroys homelands, frightens and oppresses people. Nothing that, in the end, brings more bad than it does good can be justified. Any kind of war is unjustifiable because it involves only killing. And what kind of victory does one get? Victory over millions of dead human flesh.Victory over the broken hearts of the family and relatives. We must not forget the horrors of the two world wars. In these wars, there was mass-killing and destruction of property. Thousands were made widows and orphans. War brings hatred and spreads falsehood. People become selfish and brutal. Finally I believe Wars are not the solution of the problems. Instead they generate problems and create hatred among nations. War can decide one issue but gives birth too many. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are the greatest horrible faces of the consequence of wars. Even after 60 years people are suffering from the miseries of war. Whatever be the cause of war, it always results in destruction of life and property at...

Words: 1148 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Why Did Germany Lose the War (16 Marks)

...Why did the allies win/ Germany lose the war in 1918? Some people would say that the fact that the USA entered the war in 1917 was the main reason why Germany lost the war in 1918. This is because when America entered the war they brought 1.15 million soldiers making the British army/ side much bigger and stronger than it had been before – which now meant that Germany were outnumbered. It also meant that the allies (British) had much better weapons as the Americans brought them over with them. The Americans had good weapons because they had a lot of money and could afford to buy new technology and the best of the best. However when America entered the war it took them a long time to build up their army where it was needed in France and by this time Russia retreated giving Germany the perfect opportunity to move more troops into France and once again gain power of the war. So America going into the war wasn’t important in Germany loosing the war because Germany ended up coming out on top because the Russians retreated making both sides almost equal again. This shows that this was not the main reason that Germany lost the war because at the end of this the Germans were equal with the allies. Another reason which would contribute to Germany loosing the war would be because of Allies and technology. In 1918 the allies had amazing communications and transport systems, they also had really good strong machinery which didn’t break down – the allies also could/ did improve......

Words: 1156 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Why the War on Drugs Failed

...Shakib Hossain Causal Argument English 191 February 2015 Why the War on Drugs Failed “For every prohibition you create, you also create an underground”. These words by famous musician Jello Biafra may sound prejudiced, but it is the truth we all live and have lived by since the prohibition era. The war on drugs has become a significant issue in today’s society, but people are not completely sure why the war on drugs has failed. In reference to Jello Biafra, the war on drugs is a type of a prohibition, but the real question is how big of an underground has this war created that it has ultimately failed. The start of the war on drugs can officially be dated as far back as 1971 when Richard Nixon declared drug abuse as “public enemy number one”, and he increased the size and presence of federal drug control agencies (Drug Policy Alliance, 2014). Later, during Ronald Reagan’s presidency, the number of people incarcerated for drug abuse shot up sky high due to his zero tolerance policy, and the unpredicted rise of illicit drug use. When we say the war on drugs has failed, we usually consider that the use of illicit drugs could not be reduced and is on the rise. However, it is also because it is costing more and more lives every day in addition to all the resources used coming out of the taxpayers’ pockets. In short, the war on drugs has failed because the government enforced punishment instead of prevention, which led to creating a black market that increased crime and......

Words: 1553 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Why Go to War

...Ms.Johnston English 4a 24 November, 15 Motivation Why do men and women go to war? This was one of the questions that stuck out to me during the Socratic seminar. It stuck out to me the most because no matter what reason I come up with, it wont be true for every person who dedicates their life to their country. Meaning that this entire essay would only be an opinion or theory based off of the information that I encountered and the way I interpret it. When I think of a reason people decided and will decide to go to war, I come up with so many different answers. All of which can be correct for hundreds but incorrect for hundreds more. Be that as it may, I decided that some people go to war for selfish reasons and some for unselfish reasons. The selfish section contains the men who go to war to get the monetary benefits, the physique of a soldier and for self-fulfillment. Self-fulfillment can be the thought of equality for women, or even the thought of fighting just to build a name like Achilles of the Iliad. Achilles had no opinion about why the world was fought; he just simply fought to be remembered. This is selfish to me because he signed himself up to take the lives of others just to fulfill his sought out legacy. It’s different if he felt strongly about the conflict and wanted to make a difference but in his case he could careless. Soldiers like Achilles disregard the lives that they destroy including the lives that they take away and even the lives that they......

Words: 619 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Did Hitler Loose the War

...World War Two have been the cause for debate for many years. Not only has the loss of Germany been discussed at great lengths, also have the reasons. It can be said that although much thought and fact has been taken into consideration when discussing Germany's loss as a whole; not as much attention has been given to that of the loss of Hitler as a man and a leader. Germany's loss of World War Two was not only a loss on behalf of the country as a whole, but a personal loss to Hitler. Why was this such a loss to Hitler? Why did he experience a personal downfall? How did he create his own demise? There are many reasons as to why this is so, but the fact that his ideas were behind the war is a reason why it was not only Germany's downfall, but Hitler's also. He was a man of influence in Germany; the timing was right, and he was in the hot spot. He was the leader of a highly populated European country, he wanted more for himself and for his people. He had ideas, he made decisions based on them. What were his ideas? What was behind them, what did he intend them to accomplish? Where did they lead, and how did this lead to a countrywide and worldwide loss, and even a personal loss? In discussing some of Hitler's ideas such as, lebensraum (which ties in with treaty issues), purity of the state of Germany and a zeal for his people and the desire to make changes for the betterment of his country; it will be seen that although his ideas might have been initally pure, they led to the war,......

Words: 1578 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Keep Going

...人称代词和物主代词的用法; 3. 名词的单复数和所有格的用法; 4. 冠词的基本用法; 5. There be句型的用法。 6. 本单元学过的词汇、短语和句型; 7. 本单元学过的日常交际用语。 考试形式可以是单项填空、完型填空、短文填空、完成句子。 【中考范例】 1. (2004年北京市中考试题) Mary, please show ________ your picture. A. my B. mine C. I D. me 【解析】答案:D。该题考查的是人称代词和物主代词的用法。本题中动词show后面跟双宾语,空白处应填入人称代词的宾格me作宾语。 2. (2004年上海市徐汇区中考试题) _________ orange on the desk is for you, Mike. A. A B.An C. / D. The 【解析】答案:D。该题考查的是冠词的基本用法。因为是特指课桌上的那个橘子,所以用定冠词the。 3. (2004年哈尔滨市中考试题) ---What _______ the number of the girls in your class? ---About twenty. A. is B. am C. are D. be 【解析】答案:A。该题考查的是动词be的用法和主谓一致。the number作主语,应该是单数第三人称,动词be变为is。 4. (2004年陕西省中考试题) There _______ a football match on TV this evening. A. will have B. is going to be C. has D. is going to have 【解析】答案:B。该题考查的是There be…句型和动词have用法区别。There be句型本身就表示“在某个地方存在某个人或物”,不能和动词have混在一起用。 【满分演练】 一. 单项填空 1. ---What colour is the bike? ---It’s _______ orange. A. an B. a C. / D. the 2. That isn’t her bag. It’s ________. A. my B. I C. mine D. me 3. ---Oh, your kite is very nice. ---__________________. A. That’s right B. No, it’s not nice C. Yes, it is D. Thank you 4. The woman is sixty, but she _______ young. A. is B. sees C. looks D. watches 5. It’s time ________ lunch. Let’s go home. A. to B. in C. for D. on 6. ---________ is your coat? ---The black one. A. What B. Where C. Which D. How 7. ---________ is the toy? ---It’s on the bed. A. Who B.......

Words: 26533 - Pages: 107

e84a07- Kette mit Steinkugeln, wohl Ozean Jaspis | Прямая ссылка | Einspritzdüse Injektor Ford Fusion Fiesta 1,4 TDCI Mazda 2 Toyota Aygo 1,4