The Right to Bear Arms

In: Social Issues

Submitted By drowen
Words 1360
Pages 6
The Right to Bear Arms

Gun control has been a controversial issue for many years. A vast majority of citizens believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would quickly reduce the threat of crime. Many innocent people feel they have the right to bear arms for protection, or even just the pleasure of hunting. Americans have a constitutional right to own hand guns and stricter laws and licensing will not affectively save lives.

The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in the Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation or individuals.

“We established however some, although not all its (self-government) important principles. The

constitutions of most of our states assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they

exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent; (as in

electing their functionaries executive and legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves, in

all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved,) or may they act by representatives, freely and

equally chosen that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed” (Jefferson).

It is believed that The Founding Fathers thought that the society benefited from guns being in the hands of the people. This way all citizens were able to defend themselves at all times.

The government has passed many laws regarding the ownership and use of firearms. Currently the federal law states the following: The use of any firearm in a violent or drug trafficking crime is punishable by law. A person who wishes to purchase a firearm must be 18 years of age to…...

Similar Documents

Modest Proposal: Right to Bear Arms

...Monteith B6 February 20, 2013 2nd Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms When people here about mass killings involving fire arms, they automatically think it’s the guns fault. As if the gun fired on its own. This makes people think that our right to own fire arms should be taken away. Take a second and think about this, who was holding the gun? The majority of mass killings are done by someone that has a mental illness. We wouldn’t have to take away our right to bear arms if we figured out what to do about people with a mental illness. Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and autism are the 3 main illnesses that the mass killers tend to have. Autism is usually detected early. Sometimes it is detected even before a child is born. Once it is figured out that a child will be autistic, they should be eliminated. This way we have taken out a potential threat to our community. The majority of schizophrenia cases are usually detected at the age 20. Bipolar disorder is normally diagnosed in teen years or early, most before the age of 25. Making it mandatory that every person at the age of 18 to be tested for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, whether they show symptoms or not, then every 2 years after that. Should someone refuse to get tested they would be sentenced to death. If a person should notice someone with symptoms before they are 18, they should contact local law enforcement so that the person is taken to get tested right away. Once a person is diagnosed with......

Words: 526 - Pages: 3

The Right to Keep and Bear Arms

...The Right to Keep and Bear Arms: A Right to Self-Defense Against Criminals and Despots by Robert Dowlut[*] If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. -- James Madison[1] INTRODUCTION A written constitution is a reminder that governments can be unreasonable and unjust. By guaranteeing that "[a] well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed," the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides the citizens a means of protection against the unjust excesses of government.[2] The Framers placed this guarantee in the Bill of Rights because they considered the right to keep and bear arms peculiarly important and also uniquely vulnerable to infringement. The Amendment's command protects individuals against even popular conceptions of the public good. In addition to this protection within the United States Constitution,[3] the constitutions of forty-three states guarantee the right to keep and bear arms.[4] Despite the constitutional authority for this right, legislators and judges have consistently attempted to devalue it. Methods such as giving misleading labels to select firearms like "assault weapons"[5] or "Saturday Night Specials"[6] have been used to justify incremental disarmament.[7] American jurisprudence has deliberately devalued the......

Words: 7782 - Pages: 32

Is the Right to Bear Arms Ethical

...Senior Research Project: Is the right to bear arms ethical? Lucas Van Duyn Senior Seminar: Business Ethics Dr. Jewe July 31, 2012 Introduction to the Project: In the United States, research into firearms and violent crime is fraught with difficulties, associated with limited data on gun ownership and use, firearms markets, and aggregation of crime data. Research studies into gun violence have primarily taken one of two approaches: case-control studies and social ecology. Gun ownership is usually determined through surveys, proxy variables, and sometimes with production and import figures. In statistical analysis of homicides and other types of crime, which are rare events, these data tend to have poison distributions, which also presents methodological challenges to researchers. (Just Facts, 2010) Americans own an estimated 270 million firearms, approximately 90 guns for every 100 people. In 2009, guns took the lives of 31,347 Americans in homicides, suicides and unintentional shootings. This is the equivalent of more than 85 deaths each day and more than three deaths each hour. 66,769 Americans were treated in hospital emergency departments for non-fatal gunshot wounds in 2009. Firearms were the third-leading cause of injury-related deaths nationwide in 2009, following poisoning and motor vehicle accidents. Between 1955 and 1975, the Vietnam War killed over 58,000 American soldiers – less than the number of civilians killed with guns in the U.S. in an......

Words: 10549 - Pages: 43

Arms

...2013 SUBJECT:   Summary of the Army White Paper: A Profession of Arms 1.   Purpose:   To summarize the Army White Paper: A Profession of Arms and capture the thesis, main points, and objective of the writer. 2.   Facts: a. The author notes the purpose of his writing in the beginning prologue, “This White Paper serves to facilitate an Army-wide dialog about our Profession of Arms.   It is neither definitive nor authoritative, but a starting point with which to begin discussion.”   He alludes to future refinement of the paper once TRADOC receives feedback from the Army community. b. Organized into five sections, A Profession of Arms begins by defining “Profession” and its implications to the Army.   The paper then delves into the Army’s “Professional Culture,” before discussing the effects of “Army Ethics” in developing that culture.   Lastly, it analyzes the role of U.S. society in the development of Army ethics and culture.   The paper concludes with possible future changes in the meaning “Profession of Arms” after a decade of war and a request to begin a community dialogue on this topic. c. To start the discussion, the author defines Profession when he states, “Professions produce uniquely expert work, not routine or repetitive work.”   He continues by describing truly expert work as taking years of study and practice.   The writer transitions into how the Army is an “American Profession of Arms, a vocation comprised of experts certified in the ethical......

Words: 619 - Pages: 3

Bearing Arms

...Mary Petto English 101 2/05/2013 Essay The Right to Bear Arms Having the right to carry a gun is an opinion. Some Americans feel the need to be able to practice their rights and carry guns either on them or in their house for safety. To some being able to own a gun is more of a hobby but for most it is for security. With all the bad events going on in this country, we as Americans should ask ourselves; are guns more harmful or are they more helpful? Since the beginning of time, humans have always had weapons of some sort to protect themselves and their families and it should stay the same now of days. Taking gun rights away would put our country and the people in it in more danger than if we are to keep our rights. If gun rights are taken away, people with bad intentions will still find a way to either get guns and kill or find some kind of weapon and do it (Musgraves, 2012). Americans will be helpless in situations where a gun or weapon is being used. With nothing to defend ourselves, we take a chance on being killed. In other ways, not being able to have guns or weapons could put Americans in danger because some Americans will feel the need to make a riot and protest about this which can lead to mast destruction (Musgraves, 2012). Americans that are able to carry a gun or keep one with them or at their house is able to provide themselves and their family security that the government cannot. If someone decides to rob someone at their house,......

Words: 1183 - Pages: 5

Felons Right to Bare Arms

...Felons’ Rights to Bare Arms Felons’ Rights to Bare Arms Felons’ Rights to Bare Arms Why is it against the law for a felon to bare arms. The law applies to every criminal that served more than a year in prison ( the statute forbids not only “felons ‘ but any person convicted of “ a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year ‘ to posses a firearm or ammunition, whether the crime in question is classified as a felony or not. ). In my opinion this law should be reverse because most criminal offenders are non-violent ones and they do not have the right to defend themselves. What if a violent burglar breaks into their house and attempts to shoot them, they have no way of defending themselves ( I mean they could struggle for the gun but there I always that tiny risk of getting shot and they also could attempt to stab the burglar then they would go o jail for gun possession. I think that this law is just wrong and should be revaluated, to see if thee is some other way to allow these past offenders to bare arms. This is but just one example of the myraid collateral consequences faced by those who are convicted of a felony. Another right which felons lose is that of voting. I believe that in discussing both of these prohibitions, I agree with some other posters: that the particular crime for which someone was convicted is more important than whether the crime was a......

Words: 619 - Pages: 3

Right to Bear Arms

...Right to Bear Arms and The Second Amendment October 20, 2010 Should only the criminals be allowed to own guns that they buy from the Black-market? Ask yourself this question next time you vote. A coalition of gun control groups and some politicians are trying to get the Second Amendment changed so that millions of Americans can’t and won’t be able to own guns legally in the United States. The Second Amendment reads: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The number of well-publicized public shootings during the past few years, especially the tragedy at Columbine High School, has re-energized the gun control movement. As a show of strength coalition of gun control groups have organized many protests. These types of events are designed to stir up emotions rather than promote rational thought. And when one looks at the facts about gun control, it's easy to see why the anti-gun lobby relies on emotion rather than logic to make its case. Some of their facts are: Thousands of children die annually in gun accidents. Actually the truth is that gun accidents involving children are actually at record lows, although you wouldn't know it from listening to the mainstream media. In 2008, the last year for which data are available, only 142 children under 15 years of age died in gun accidents, and the total number of gun-related deaths for this age group was 642. More......

Words: 1138 - Pages: 5

Bears

...Running head: WRITING STYLE AND MECHANICS Typically, the running head is required only for publication. Check with your instructor regarding the preference for using a running head. Doctoral students must include the running head. The words Running head only appear on the title page. Use no more than the first 50 characters of the title. 1 Pagination and Page Header: Use the header feature in Microsoft® Word to set the page number and to add the running head if one is included. See Appendix A for directions. The title is in upper and lower case letters, centered between the left and right margins, and positioned on the upper half of the page. Use black, 12point Times New Roman font throughout. Arial and Courier font types are acceptable. Doctoral students: See the note below about formatting the title page for your program requirements. Writing Style and Mechanics Student Name Course/Number Date Instructor Name* REQUIRED TITLE PAGE INFORMATION As shown above, center the following elements on the page in this order:  Title of Paper (mixed upper and lower case letters)  Your Name (first and last name without including academic or license information such as BSN or RN)  Course Abbreviation and Number  Due Date (month, day, and year)  Instructor’s Name *Doctoral students must format the title page according to APA guidelines as follows: title, author’s name, and institution name. All lines are double-spaced throughout the entire document. Use black,......

Words: 5144 - Pages: 21

Bear

...Case 08-4 The Bear Minimum Big Bear Power (Big Bear) is a public utility company that has posted strong financial results for several years. Big Bear has positive cash flow, and it is in compliance with all its debt covenants. Big Bear leases a combustion turbine from Goliath Co. (Goliath) for a 10-year noncancelable term. The lease agreement is signed on December 15, 2010, and Big Bear’s right to use the turbine begins on January 1, 2011. Various provisions and other facts from the lease are listed below. Provision 1 Big Bear pays Stipe, Berry, Mills and Buck LLP, its external legal counsel, $500,000 in connection with negotiating the lease agreement. Big Bear is also required to pay $1 million of legal fees incurred by Goliath. Provision 2 The stated default provisions in the lease include a provision that requires a penalty payment if Big Bear’s bank declares a default under its primary credit arrangement. Big Bear will be in default under the credit arrangement if there is a “material adverse change” in its financial condition. Material adverse change is not defined in the loan documents. Big Bear believes the likelihood of default is remote. The bank has no relationships with Goliath. (Note that this is a customary provision in leasing arrangements.) Provision 3 The lease agreement stipulates that Big Bear’s lease payments shall be $1 million per year, payable ratably over 12 months at the beginning of each month. For each calendar year of the term of the lease after......

Words: 354 - Pages: 2

Right to Bear Arms

...are a distraction to the reader. Thank you, Karen The Right to Bear Arms November 2012 Right to Bear Arms The right to bear arms is the Second Amendment to the Constitution, stating that the people of the United States shall have the right to keep and bear arms and this right will not be infringed. “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Coia, 2010). This right has been an issue in many court systems for many years. Court systems have said it is to the discretion of the state to uphold this right. Many states have passed that it is illegal for a convicted criminal to to own or possess a fire arm. Also, court systems have said, that you may posses a fire arm even if you are not part of a militia. For many years now, the Second Amendment right has been under much debate. Is it the right for individuals to own a fire arm or is it to ensure that the militias continue to succeed? In 2008, District of Columbia vs Heller, the court has determined that the Second Amendment gave individuals the right to posses a handgun in their homes for protection. This case had left many questions unanswered, mainly whether or not the Second Amendment affected state and local law or only the federal government. In 2010, in the case of McDonald vs the City of Chicago, the court decided that the Second Amendment right did affected the power of state government. Even with......

Words: 2022 - Pages: 9

Right to Bear Arms

...the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Our Founding Fathers believed that governments are prone to use soldiers to oppress the people. History had suggested that this risk could be controlled by permitting the government to raise armies (consisting of full-time paid troops) only when needed to fight foreign enemies. “We established however some, although not all its (self-government) important principles. The constitutions of most of our states assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent; (as in electing their functionaries executive and legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves, in all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved,) or may they act by representatives, freely and equally chosen that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed” (Jefferson). Gun control has been a highly controversial issue for decades. A vast majority of Americans believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would quickly reduce the threat of crime. Many innocent people feel they have the right to bear arms for protection, or even just the pleasure of recreational sports, such as hunting. Americans have a constitutional right to own hand guns. Although, stricter laws and licensing may not affectively abolish crime, it will help to make it more challenging for anyone to purchase fire arms. Currently the federal law......

Words: 1227 - Pages: 5

The Right to Bear Arms

...The Right to Bear Arms Katie Bruner BCOM275 January 4, 2011 Christine Taylor Doctor's Asking About Guns in the Home Recently the discussion on the radio was about pediatricians asking parents about firearms in the household. I found an article with basic pros and cons to this subject. Law are put into place to keep the public safe, but sometimes those law start to step on the toes of Americans’ rights. Is it really necessary for my pediatrician to ask me about my gun collection or if I even have one? The Second Amendment is a powerful one, but people are making it difficult for any ordinary citizen to enjoy this right. According to (Constitution.org, 10/1), the Second Amendment to the Bill of Rights says, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (Constitution.org, 11/2) says “The militia, when properly formed, is in fact the people themselves….all men capable of bearing arms.” The Second Amendment was ultimately formed so that the government cannot become too strong and overpower the people. This means anyone in America has the right to bear arms. Now I understand the need to put some regulation on this right for obvious reasons. But what I do not understand is what having a gun has to do with my children’s well baby check-ups. When reading this article Kids and Guns: Why Doctors Have a Right to Know, it say how a pediatrician told the......

Words: 665 - Pages: 3

Bear

...Build A Bear How does a small start-up company achieve such accolades? A small start-up company such as Build-A-Bear can achieve such accolades by doing what it has been doing for the last fifteen years. It has kept the customer very involved in the final product. That way there is never a dissatisfied customer, because they created exactly what they wanted to see as an end result. Not only do you have a very pleased customer, but the company has also created a personal memory with them that can never be taken away. Which is a lot more than other companies can offer. 1. Give examples of needs, wants, and demands that Build-A-Bear customers demonstrate, differentiating each of these three concepts. What are the implications of each on Build-A-Bear’s actions? Build-A-Bear customer’s needs are the self-expression and affection they have from building their friend. The want that they have is adding all the accessories that don’t necessarily need to be on the bear, but it’s what makes them unique. Is this essay helpful? Join OPPapers to read more and access more than 550,000 just like it! get better grades Demands are things like the Spiderman costume that came out when Spiderman the movie was a hit. 2. In detail, describe all facets of Build-A-Bear’s product. What is being exchanged in a Build-A-Bear transaction? In a Build-A-Bear transaction the customers have multiple options to apply within the making of the bear. For example, the choosing of...

Words: 382 - Pages: 2

Profession of Arms

...PROFESSION OF ARMS The purpose of this paper is to express a set of views on the ethical obligations of members of the American profession of arms in order to stimulate thoughtful discussion and broader debate about the proper limits of acceptable and effective professional conduct. These views are focused for most part on the obligations of commissioned officers, but they apply in many ways to the public and private conduct of senior non-commissioned officers, and indeed, all military members. They depend to a large degree on a particular understanding of the governing compact of this country and the behavior American citizens expect of their uniformed servants. The overall objective of the Army Profession of Arms campaign is for Soldiers and leaders to refine their understanding of what it means to be professionals expert members of the Profession of Arms after nine years of war and to recommit to a culture of service and the responsibilities and behaviors of our profession as articulated in the Army Ethic. Much of the initial discussion involving this campaign focuses on whether or not military service is a profession. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary defines a profession as "a calling requiring specialized knowledge and often long and intensive academic preparation; a principal calling, vocation, or employment; or the whole body of persons engaged in a calling. Based on the subtle differences between the definitions of a profession and an occupation,......

Words: 825 - Pages: 4

Profession of Arms

...An Army White Paper THE PROFESSION OF ARMS I AM AN EXPERT AND I AM A PROFESSIONAL 9TH STANZA SOLDIER’S CREED CG TRADOC Approved 8 December 2010 Authority: This White Paper has been approved for distribution on 2 December 2010 by the Commanding General, Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), under his authority granted by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Staff of the Army in the Terms of Reference dated 27 October 2010 for TRADOC to execute the ‗Review of the Army Profession in an Era of Persistent Conflict.‘ Purpose: This White Paper serves to facilitate an Army-wide dialog about our Profession of Arms. It is neither definitive nor authoritative, but a starting point with which to begin discussion. It will be refined throughout calendar year 2010 based on feedback from across our professional community. All members of the profession and those who support the profession are encouraged to engage in this dialog. Distribution: Distribution is unlimited. Yet, the material in this draft is under development. It can be referenced, but not referenced or cited as official Army policy or doctrine. Feedback and Participation: Comments on this White Paper should be sent to the Center for the Army Profession and Ethic (CAPE), Combined Arms Center, TRADOC. To get engaged in this review of the Profession of Arms, visit the CAPE website at http://www.us.army.mil/suite/page/611545 and click on the Campaign link. The website will also provide links to professional......

Words: 13494 - Pages: 54

cherish@第一会所@[AsianStreetMeat]Ngiap.anal | 30-11-2018 – Sri Vishnu Dasavatharam Zee... | Haarpflege & Styling