Why, and with What Success, Did Elizabeth Resist Puritan Attempts to Modify the Religious Settlement?

In: Historical Events

Submitted By jhazelton57
Words 1236
Pages 5
“Marry, sir, sometimes he is a kind of puritan.” – “O, if I thought that I’d beat him like a dog!”
The word ‘puritan’ was used as a term of abuse in Shakespeare’s ‘Twelfth Night’, yet fifty years earlier John Knox wrote of “the godly and zealous preachers” in his works of 1558. There is a wide scale of debate over where the biggest Puritan threat came from, and the level of success in which Elizabeth dealt with them. Overall, the biggest threat came from separatists who aimed to disband the Church of England. A rise in extreme Puritan ideology would’ve certainly been perceived as a threat. However, these threats were dealt with so effectively by Elizabeth that they could not have developed into a serious threat by the 1590s.
John E Neale argues that the Settlement was challenged by a ‘Puritan Choir’ in Parliament. With hindsight, it is proven that Neale took his idea from the 17th century Puritan sympathiser Simon D’Ewes, who possessed unreliable sources. However, Elton points out that leading Puritan MPs consistently opposed features of the Settlement. This is true to some extent – Walter Strickland’s 1571 Bill to reform the Book of Common Prayer was shortly followed by the start of John Field’s Parliamentary campaign through his ‘Admonitions to Parliament’. Opposition seemed evident up until the late 1580s; in 1587 Anthony Cope’s bill demanded the publication of an English Genevan Prayer Book. The fact that Parliament allowed the bill to be read shows that it had some sympathy toward Puritan grievances. Nevertheless, Elton’s view loses interpretation against the more sustained view of W.J Jones, who claims that the parliamentary challenge stood little chance. Indeed, within Parliament Elizabeth was in her strongest position to keep “a vice-like grip on the pace of change”, as stated by John Guy. The Queen showed her indignation towards Strickland by vetoing most…...

Similar Documents


...where many attempts to create the model society. The Puritans where one group that wanted to make a society based on their beliefs. The Puritans wanted to purify the church of England. They also wanted to build a purified society. One aspiration that really took of for the puritans was their attempt to create a self-government. The Puritans wanted to have “A City upon a Hill”, in which the eyes of all people would have been upon them . They felt in order to build a purified society they would have to following in the way of the Bible. Basically people question whether the Puritans were an intolerant religious group of racists or the foundation of America? There are valid claims on both sides. Although, many historians believe Puritans had a direct effect on the rapid and successful development of American civilization, that the Puritans were able to come up with the idea of a “democratic” state, the whole process of a few governing and people elect came from them, but for the most part we can see through their beilefs and laws they were an intolerant group that goes against American values set in the constitution. The biggest American value set in our constitution is the separation of Church and State. We enjoy basic human freedoms, like freedom of religion and speech. This was not the case with the puritans. They imposed concrete belief in the Bible and lived by it. Maintaining your life based on the Bible sets valuable limits. Prior to following the Bible, the Puritans......

Words: 1094 - Pages: 5

What Is Strategic Management, and Why Is It Critical to the Success of an Organization in Meeting Its Goals and Mission?

...APPLE, Inc. What is Strategic Management, and why is it critical to the success of an organization in meeting its goals and mission? What is Strategic Management? The concept of "strategy" is based in a war scenario, the constant fights and battles over the centuries have caused the military to start thinking before you act- the battles are analyzed and planned in advance. In General Sun Tzu’s words: “The general who wins a battle makes many calculations in his temple ere the battle is fought.” When translating it to today’s Strategic Management’s words, it means: “Those companies and individuals who win in the business world make much calculation, planning and deliberations on their strategy and plans. Those who plan less have lower chance of success, much less those who don’t plan anything at all.” (Soo, 2011). Developing a Strategic Planning increases the likelihood that in the future, the organization will be in the right place at the right time. Strategic Management collects all activities and processes utilized by an organization in order to align resources and actions with mission, vision and strategy throughout the organization. When applied correctly, strategic management activities transform the vision into performance and enable the plan to evolve and grow as requirements and other circumstances change. Apple – Both sides of the fruit The right side In researching the Apple’s success, we can find a myriad of reports appreciating this fact....

Words: 1406 - Pages: 6

Reason Why People Resist Change

...Top Ten Reasons People Resist Change: 1. THE RISK OF CHANGE IS SEEN AS GREATER THAN THE RISK OF STANDING STILL Making a change requires a kind of leap of faith: you decide to move in the direction of the unknown on the promise that something will be better for you. But you have no proof. Taking that leap of faith is risky, and people will only take active steps toward the unknown if they genuinely believe – and perhaps more importantly, feel – that the risks of standing still are greater than those of moving forward in a new direction. Making a change is all about managing risk. If you are making the case for change, be sure to set out in stark, truthful terms why you believe the risk situation favors change. Use numbers whenever you can, because we in the West pay attention to numbers. At the very least, they get our attention, and then when the rational mind is engaged, the emotional mind (which is typically most decisive) can begin to grapple with the prospect of change. But if you only sell your idea of change based on idealistic, unseen promises of reward, you won’t be nearly as effective in moving people to action. The power of the human fight-or-flight response can be activated to fight for change, but that begins with the perception of risk. 2. PEOPLE FEEL CONNECTED TO OTHER PEOPLE WHO ARE IDENTIFIED WITH THE OLD WAY We are a social species. We become and like to remains connected to those we know, those who have taught us, those with whom we are familiar – even......

Words: 2304 - Pages: 10

Why Was Puritanism Perceived to Be a Threat to Stability in Elizabethan England??

...Miriam Tenquist Why was Puritanism perceived to be a threat to stability in Elizabethan England?? Amounting to a mere 3% of the English population why was Puritanism viewed as a threat to stability? The clear factors contributing lies within the radical beliefs, significant support from key figures, high quality and skill held by puritans and the fragility of the structure of Elizabethan parliament, furthermore it is also incredibly important to consider Elizabeth’s response and own personal views towards puritans and perhaps the true reason for the perceived ‘phantom’ threat lying within the harsh reactions of Elizabeth. Due to the fragile nature of the government Elizabeth had inherited it was vital for it to remain sable and deal with stressing issues such as religion with great care, Elizabeth had 3 options when it came to religion, maintain catholic religion Mary had set up, create moderate form of Protestantism or create a more radical Genevan style reform. The influence of puritans’ on parliament can be perceived as a threat to stability as their influence greatly undermined the authority of the queen. With the support/sympathy of various key figures; Strickland, field, Dudley, Burghley and perhaps the most notable Edmund grindal, who’s support of prophesying highlights the danger puritans’ held in the eyes of Elizabeth. His refusal to ban the act led to his suspension and house arrest. Such quick and harsh response from the queen implies how seriously she......

Words: 1636 - Pages: 7

Why Were Puritans Perceived a Threat in the Elizabethan Period

...Why were Puritans perceived a threat in the Elizabethan period? Puritans were perceived a threat during the Elizabethan period due to a number of reasons. One of the most recognizable objects of the Puritans that could be perceived as a real threat to Elizabeth, was their belief in taking the title and offices from the Bishops. They also gave rise to threatening Elizabeth’s power through their attempts to reform the Church through parliament. Due to Elizabeth’s religious settlement at the time being neither Catholic nor Protestant, rise of a hugely exaggerated protestant religion could of have serious percussions including a Catholic rebellion against Elizabeth. The Puritans belief in taking the titles and riches from Bishops, creating Bishops centered on a spiritual life only created a serious potential threat to Elizabeth. Thomas Cartwright lectured in Cambridge University in 1535-1602 of the abolition of Bishops power and titles along with other Puritan beliefs. Thomas’s beliefs left little room for Elizabeth’s Supreme Governship and his idea of clearing the power of the Bishops lead to several threats towards Elizabeth’s power. Having Catholic leaning, rich, powerful Bishops meant if it were advisable for reasons of foreign policy to minimize the differences between the Church of England and the continual Catholic Church having a shared institution of episcopy would help a great deal. Elizabeth was also keen on keeping tradition. Her Father, Henry VIII had never......

Words: 1222 - Pages: 5

Why Did Elizabeth Execute Mary Queen of Scots in 1587?

...Why did Elizabeth execute Mary in 1587? Throughout Elizabeth's reign, she faced many problems from both extreme Catholics and Protestants. For example, many Catholics believed that Elizabeth was an illegitimate heir to the throne, therefore she should be killed and replaced with her cousin, Mary Queen of Scots, who was the “rightful heir to the throne”. Mary was a threat to Elizabeth and the throne, simply by being in England, therefore Elizabeth needed to make a decision on how to deal with this threat. In order to assess why Elizabeth executed Mary in 1587, it is important to look at her other options in dealing with Mary, such as allowing her to go back to France or to help her regain her throne in Scotland, which Mary was forced to give up when she was imprisoned in Lochleven Castle for the murder of her second husband, and the consequences of these options, both short-term and long-term. In May 1568, after Mary had escaped from imprisonment and fled to England in the hope that Elizabeth would help her, a decision needed to be made about what to do with Mary, as she was a threat to the throne – she represented Catholics all over England. If Elizabeth executed Mary at this point, although she knew she would be removing the threat to the throne, she also knew that she could be accused of murdering a legitimate Queen, and the French may become more hostile towards England, resulting in wars. Therefore, at this point, Elizabeth knew she was unable to execute Mary,......

Words: 1310 - Pages: 6

Catholics and Elizabeth 1

...passages and our on knowledge, assess the view that the Roman Catholics were a serious threat to Elizabeth I and the church she had established. Elizabeth had inherited the throne of England in 1558 from a Catholic queen Mary who had attempted to re-convert England back to Catholicism and to allow the country to take part in the Catholic reformation of Europe. The accession of Elizabeth was met with anxiety and tension as to discover what she was to do in response to religion and how the Catholic powers of Europe as well as the Catholics within England at the time would treat any changes. The immediate rise to power was met with little hostility as Elizabeth had made very cautious changes to start with as she thought it wise not to provoke hostility from abroad considering the position of England at the time as a small, weak protestant nation. The start of Elizabeth’s reign was fairly peaceful however tensions rose and a Catholic threat seemed more imminent as her reign drew to the end. In order to find out if the Roman Catholics were in fact a serious threat to Elizabeth and her church the essay must be split down into two main sub-sections, one to discover whether Catholics were a threat to Elizabeth herself and the other to decide whether they were a prominent threat to Elizabeth’s Church, however there is a very fine difference between the two as the majority of the rule of Elizabeth and her threats such as that from Spain were dominated by religion. The four......

Words: 2682 - Pages: 11


...Puritan and Powhatan Dilemmas In the story of John Winthrop by Edmund Morgan and Pocahontas by Camilla Townsend, the word dilemma is thrust at the center and is the driving force for these biographies. Using the word dilemma suggests there is a conflict and one must make decisions and/or choose a particular side. This most certainly is the case for both John Winthrop’s Puritans and Powhatan. Edmund Morgan uses the title The Puritan Dilemma because the whole idea of the Puritans establishing themselves in America is itself a dilemma. Dilemma is used in Camilla Townsend’s title Pocahontas and the Powhatan Dilemma because the situation that Pocahontas’s people, the Powhatan, are forced into is very much so a dilemma. The word was chosen with a purpose and the reasons for why both authors use dilemma in their biography titles is explored individually and then compared. The dilemma of John Winthrop and the Puritans is depicted throughout the biography. It is clear that the dilemma they faced was surrounded by their religious views. Winthrop and the Puritans embraced religion so much as to move to New England and create the “kind of society that God demanded of all His servants but that none had yet given Him (Morgan, 42).” Morgan puts a lot of effort to show the reader that the Puritan view of religion was plagued with the idea and question of what responsibility does a religious person owe to society. Morgan argues that this question and dilemma that Winthrop and......

Words: 1480 - Pages: 6

What Husband's Can't Resist

...and What husbands can't resist – An extensive review If you are worried about losing your husband either to another woman or due to any other reason, the best way to get back hold of him is to buy and read the what husbands can't resist eBook. The “what husbands can't resist” eBook is a masterpiece on relationships and can help you in a much simpler way to understand human relationships than most psychologists can help. Once you start applying the techniques illustrated in the book you would be amazed how quickly and how effectively they work. This book has been written by Bob Grant, who is undoubtedly one of the finest mentors on human emotions and human relationships, which you would agree once you read the book. The amount of research he has put in making this book is remarkable and has to be applauded. This is no regular relationships book and can turn around the perspectives of wives and husbands within days. Especially if you are a wife unable to understand the simplicity of a male mind, this book would be your best friend. You could learn the following things with the help of “what husbands can't resist”: • The art of making your husband perform the actions you want him to perform • How to reignite communication with your husband in a long lasting manner • How to identify your husband’s biggest turn on and his biggest turn offs • Understand how to compliment your husband • Understand how to rekindle romance even after years......

Words: 378 - Pages: 2

Why Did Elizabeth Pursue a Comprisimise Religious Settlement in 1559?

...Why did Elizabeth pursue a compromise religious settlement in 1559? In 1559 when Elizabeth became queen, she had the large trouble of trying to decide what religion England should become. Previously, the religion in England had changed with every new person to the throne which each time created problems with the people living in England at the time. Famously, her father Henry 8th changed the Church of England from Catholic because he wanted a divorce from Anne Boleyn and from then on the religion was constantly changing. So as soon as Elizabeth took the throne she knew she had a big decision to make and whatever decision she made she had to strongly weigh up the advantages and disadvantages and most importantly, think how the public will react. I think the most important reason for Elizabeth pursuing a compromise religious settlement was to avoid rebellion and develop good relations with powers abroad. An ally in 1559 was Spain due to late Mary being married to Philip of Spain which she wanted to stay allies with. Another possible overseas problem was trying to keep peace with France (Catholic) and to keep the French Government's relations with Scotland minimal. This made Elizabeth’s decision on what to do next very difficult as she needed to keep all overseas relations happy. If not, then Spain may have started war or invaded England which would be the complete opposite of what Elizabeth wanted as it would have made the public very unhappy. Therefore, Elizabeth could...

Words: 684 - Pages: 3

“the Puritans Were Never a Serious Threat to Elizabeth” How Far Do You Agree?

...The rise of Puritan ideology in Elizabeth I’s Church and Government was potentially an extremely dangerous threat to her power. Although it may be perceived that Elizabeth was continuing to control her position soundly, it does not mean that the Puritans did not pose a threat to royal authority. Nonetheless, attempts to promote Puritan ideas were indeed crushed quickly and effectively by Elizabeth, which meant that the movement never got the chance to develop into anything highly damaging and serious. Despite this, it would be wrong to say that the Puritans never caused havoc or danger to the Queen herself and the Church. This will be exampled by 3 documents which highlight the Queen’s rapid actions to prevent this ideology from becoming reality. There was undoubtedly an increase in extreme Protestant views during Elizabeth I’s reign and although this was the belief she supported, it was never her intention to enforce it to that extremity. She grew anxious at the amount of people supporting this movement and as a method of supressing it the Government passed a law as indicated in Source 19, from the Act against Seditious Sectaries in 1593, stating that “if any person above the age of 16…go about to move or persuade any of her Majesty’s subjects or to deny her Majesty’s power and authority…the person offending shall be adjudged a felon.” It becomes clear from this that the Queen thought the Puritans were threatening enough for Parliament to create a new law that included......

Words: 1116 - Pages: 5

Queen Elizabeth and the Church

...Queen Elizabeth I: Statesman v. Rebel against Catholicism 1. Thesis Statement Queen Elizabeth I was considered a statesman, brought back Anglicanism, and never truly picked a side of specific beliefs, allowing the people to worship freely. 2. Introduction The Elizabethan era experienced relative calm compared to previous reigns. The inauguration of Queen Elizabeth I was received with a tense spiritual atmosphere as most Catholics expected an era of political instability coupled with religious persecution as experienced with Queen Mary. Contrary to the expectations of most people, Queen Elizabeth I was less interested in zealous performances of her predecessors and believed in the interest of the majority. She wanted to be liked by the people of England, and this meant that she had to make her decisions right. She was being raised as a Protestant; she was well aware of the power struggles between the Catholics and the Protestants. She reinforced the Church of England for the people but did not do away with Roman Catholic. She chose to bring back the Church of England because she knew many of her people were hiding in exile. She wanted them to come back and enjoy the freedom of worship without fear. She also knew that by doing this, she will increase her popularity and most people will convert to Protestant. This was a peaceful strategy of making the Church of England more popular than the roman catholic. This......

Words: 2431 - Pages: 10

‘the Main Reason Why Edward and Mary’s Religious Settlements Had Limited Success Was Because Their Reigns Were so Short.’ How Far Do You Agree with This Statement?

...‘The main reason why Edward and Mary’s religious settlements had limited success was because their reigns were so short.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Jake Nicholls To an extent I do agree with this statement as Edward a devout protestant took England to the most protestant it has ever experienced this is also the same for Mary who restored the country to papal supremacy. However, due to the rebellion and opposition each of these monarchs received it hindered the complete success of their religious settlements. Edward VI, reigned for a total of six years, however what limited Edward even further is the fact he didn’t even reach the age of majority (which had been reduced to the age of sixteen) by the time of his death in 1553, which significantly reduced his level of religious influence. Perhaps if he reached the age of majority he would have brought in more extreme protestant reforms than those of his regents, this might be explained by his upbringing as his step mother Catherine Parr was a protestant therefore provided him with reformist tutors. This shows that due to his short reign it limited the success of Edward’s religious settlement. Furthermore, Edward’s issue of not providing an heir can be blamed upon his short reign, as he was only fifteen when he died. If he had produced an heir it would have meant that his Religious settlement would have been inherited and it would have been likely his heir would have been brought up a devout protestant,......

Words: 816 - Pages: 4

Marketing Management - How Did Tesco Use the Information Collected to Modify Its Marketing Strategies What Sort of Benefits Was the Company Able to Derive as a Result of Such Modifications

...MANAGEMENT 1. What have been the key success factors for Nike? 2. Where is Nike vulnerable? What should it watch out for? 3. What recommendations would you make to senior marketing executives going forward? What should they be sure to do with its marketing? 1. What have been the key success factors for Disney? 2. Where is Disney vulnerable? What should it watch out for? 3. What recommendations would you make to their senior marketing executives going forward? What should it be sure to do with its marketing? 1. What have been the key success factors for HSBC? 2. Where is HSBC vulnerable? What should it watch out for? 3. What recommendations would you make to senior marketing executives going forward? What should they be sure to do with its marketing? 1. What have been the key success factors for Krispy Kreme? 2. Where is Krispy Kreme vulnerable? What should it watch out for? 3. What recommendations would you make to senior marketing executives going forward? What should they be sure to do with its marketing? 1. What are the key success factors for Southwest Airlines? 2. Where is Southwest Airlines vulnerable? What should it watch out for? 3. What recommendations would you make to senior marketing executives moving forward? What should they be sure to do with its marketing? 1. What have been the key success factors for Wal-Mart? 2. Where is Wal-Mart vulnerable? What should it watch out for? 3. What recommendations......

Words: 827 - Pages: 4

Why People Resist Change

...Why people resist change 1. Fear. By far the biggest reason for resistance to change, fear creates paralysis. According to Jeff Hajek, People get worried that the new way won’t work, that they will not do well following the modified process, or that it will mean having to change to another job within the company. Worst of all, they fear layoffs. 2. Misunderstanding about the need for change/when the reason for the change is unclear — According to Torben Rick if staff do not understand the need for change you can expect resistance. Especially from those who strongly believe the current way of doing things works well…and has done for many years! 3. Comfort . When people have it good, they are reluctant to give that up. According to Jeff Hajek this is most common when an improvement effort in one area requires additional work in another area. For example, let’s assume area ‘A’ can save 10 minutes by moving 5 minutes of work to area ‘B’. The employees in area ‘B’ are likely to be less than thrilled by the change, especially if things were humming along smoothly for them. 4. Personal preference. According to Jeff Hajek some people have a personal style that makes it hard for them to accept change. This is basically the ‘other’ category of resistance. Some people just like things the way they are. 5. Change in the status quo —According to Torben Rick resistance can also stem from perceptions of the change that people hold. For example, people who feel they’ll be worse off at...

Words: 429 - Pages: 2

Sun-ken Rock | Dave Davis | Haven Season 2 Episode 4