Premium Essay

Why Did the King Make the Flight to Varennes

In: Historical Events

Submitted By hkay17
Words 586
Pages 3
Why Did The King Make The Flight To Varennes?

The flight of King Louis is best explained by an accumulation of long term and short term causes, based on the beliefs and intentions of people at the time, and the existing conditions in France at that time.
The French people were against the King as they believed in the ideals of the new constitution; fraternity, liberty and equality. And the new constitution greatly decreased teh kings power, it even changed his title to King of French. This was done because it was felt Louis should rule for the French people not just for the privileged few, and they thought he couldn’t do this in Versailles with so many distractions, so they moved him to Paris where they could watch him and what he was doing. This action of moving the king to Tuileries was the short term trigger which caused the King to flee to Varennes. Tuileries was a basic castle in comparison to the extravagance of Versailles palace where the King could do what he wanted when he wanted. And as such Tuilerires was much more run down and its grounds were smaller than those at Versailles so Louis’ passion for hunting was severely limited. And this lack of luxuries led to him fleeing as he felt the condition of the accommodation was unsuitable for a King.
Leaders from other countries were worried by what was happening in France as they believed that if the revolution in France succeeded then it could inspire the people in their country to have a similar revolution. One such country was Austria. Austria was willing to help Louis as his wife Marie Antoinette was a member of the Austrian royal family. Leopold II, the Austrian leader at the time, agreed to meet Louis at Varennes where he could joinf ofirces with Austrian troops and overthrow the revolution.
The only reason the king was able to be moved to Paris, was because of what was going on at the time in…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Why Did Harold Godwinson Become King in 1066?

...When Edward the confessor died childless on the 5th of January 1066. a succession crisis was inevitable. During this period there was multiple ways in which monarchical succession could be achieved, these include: Hereditary factors, choice of the incumbent monarch, and selection by the witan and the right of conquest.. Harold had several different claims that explain the reasons he became king in 1066. These include, political, economical and social reasons, which can be categorised into long term and short term factors. Despite Harold not being blood related to his predecessor Edward, Godwin was Edwards's brother in law. Edwards marriage to Harold's sister, Edith, in around 1045 was most likely a political marriage. Edward may have seen the marriage to be necessary to maintain Godwin's support as he was the most powerful of the English earls and also because of his Danish links (Godwin's wife was kinship of Sweyn of Denmark), Another long term reason Harold became king in 1066 is due to the fact Harold was a member of the most wealthiest, powerful and richest family in England- The Godwinson family. Godwin's sons, Swein and Harold had been given earldoms in Herefordshire and East Anglia, Godwin's nephew (Sweyn of Denmark's brother), Beorn, also became earl in the East Midlands. Eventually, the Godwin family subordinately controlled Southern England???? The power and influence of the Godwinsons was evident in 1046 when Godwin's eldest son, Sweyn, abducted the abbess of......

Words: 595 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Did Icesave Fall?

...June 2009, the Icelandic Deposit Guarantee Fund would take a state-guaranteed loan from the UK and the Netherlands to repay £2.35 and €1.33 billion respectively; the total amount covered by the minimum deposit guarantee. After one of the longest parliamentary debates in the history of the Icelandic parliament, the Icesave Act was approved in August 2009 with a number of preconditions which aimed at securing Iceland’s debt sustainability and allowing Iceland to restore its economy and financial system.[2] But the President of Iceland decided not to sign the new law. A decision on whether the revised act should enter in force should be made by the public in a national referendum. Due to the frustration of ordinary citizens in Iceland who did not want to pay the price for the behavior of irresponsible bankers, 93.2% of those who voted said no to the Icesave Act of 30 December 2009. The EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) issued a Letter of Formal Notice and came to the conclusion that by failing to ensure payment of the minimum amount of compensation to Icesave depositors in the UK and the Netherlands Iceland has failed to comply with the obligations resulting from the Directive. Despite this process having been initiated by ESA, Iceland remains committed to resolve the Icesave dispute in negotiations with the UK and the Netherlands. During a financial crisis, business organizations are faced with different degrees of difficulties that may require drastic measures such as......

Words: 1424 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Why Did Chartism Fail?

...Why did Chartism Fail? * Chartism failed because of economic factors – it was simply a ‘knife and fork question’ * Chartism failed because of the inherent weakness of the movement and internal divisions within the movement * Chartism did not really fail in the truest sense of the word – it was defeated by the state Economic Factors Some historians have argued that improving economic conditions ensured the Chartist movement faded after 1848 – there had been worsening economic conditions in the period after 1837 which gave rise to the chartist movement. After this period, the lessening economic instability, growing prosperity and rise in living standards after 1848 removed basis for widespread discontent. In economic prosperity – Chartism could no longer be sustained. The interpretation has been questioned in recent decades – economic historians began questioning how stable the British economy really was during this time in ‘Mid-Victorian Boom’ (1850-73) e.g. Cunningham – disagrees as he believes the economy continued to fluctuate. A series of subtle economic changes undermined the movement after 1848 and led to the movement’s eventual fall. 1. Development of Railways – Provided stimulus to industries; iron, steel and coal. Economic growth less narrowly based than in period before 1850 when textiles had been leading sector 2. Factory Legislation – Legislation redefined management practices and relationships in the workplace; 1850s-60s saw......

Words: 1639 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Why Did Yannis Fail

...was not involved in the planning and set up of this particular restaurant, I did start within a month of this company being open. The company from the outside looked very sound, well planned, and greatly loved, however, once I began to poke around and learn the ins and outs of this company it was easy to see that there was major lacking in the management side of the company and a lack in the planning process. “Planning is a systematic process in which managers make decisions about future activities and the key goals that the organization intends to pursue.” (Reilly, Baack, & Minnick, 2014). Planning functions as the foundation for the remaining management functions, organizing, staffing, leading, and controlling. It gives direction for a company, as well as escalates an organizations chance for a higher success rate and potential to accomplishing its goals. Why did Yanni’s Fail on Planning? The first problem that this company possessed is that the owners had an idea what they wanted, but strayed away from it. They wanted a true Greek style fast food joint, but fell far from it. They had too many items on the menu and only two that were Greek. They were a cross between a small diner and a McDonalds. This created confusion for the customers as there were too many items to choose from. This also created confusion for some of the employees as there were too many items they had to remember how to make. One might think that the menu is not an issue when it comes to the......

Words: 3701 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Why Did Daisy Stay

...Buchannan dinner table??? The Great Gatsby is a novel by F. Scott Fitzgerald that tells the story of the ‘great’ Jay Gatsby, but along with his story we learn about Daisy Buchannan the love of his life and their torrid love affair. It seemed as though Daisy was ready to leave her husband Tom in Chapter VII (Fitzgerald pg. 134) but by the end of the novel Daisy has chosen to run away to New York with Tom leaving Gatsby behind without saying anything. The novel did not go into any detail as to why Daisy chooses to stay with Tom, but in one scene after all of the chaos form the brief trip to the city we see Tom and Daisy sitting at the kitchen table over a cold dinner and some ale talking, the reader is not told what is said (Fitzgerald pg. 146). The reader can infer that several things were discussed at the dinner table that evening to make Daisy leave Gatsby behind, such as Tom’s old money and ability to provide, Gatsby’s new money and his reputation, as well as Daisy’s herself. There are several good reasons why Daisy Buchannan stays with her husband Tom instead of leaving him for Gatsby. One of the reasons that she could’ve chosen to stay is the same reason that she chooses to marry Tom in the first place; he was a safe secure choice. Tom came from money, old money, and to someone like Daisy who was also of old money this was a way to a secure future without worry. The reader is made aware of Tom’s wealth is Chapter 4 when Jordan Baker, Daisy’s dearest friend is......

Words: 1113 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

During the Time of Samuel, Why Did the People of Israel Desire a King?

...Essay 2 During the time of the judges, the land was full of corruption and sin. There was no king or legal authority in Israel and the people acted on what they thought was right and wrong. “In those days there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes” (Judges 21:25). Samuel was Israel’s spiritual leader (priest), a prophet, and the last and most effective of the judges. God used Samuel to assist in the change of Israel’s government from a system of judges to kings. Samuel judged Israel until his death, saved them from the Philistines, and led them back to God. However, when Samuel grew old, he started appointing his sons as judges but they were corrupt (1 Samuel 8:1). All of the elders of Israel got together and concluded that a change in government was necessary so they went to Samuel and demanded a king. The people of Israel desired a king for several reasons: 1) Samuel was old and his sons were not fit to lead; 2) They hoped that having a king would unite the 12 tribes into one nation and one army because each tribe had their own leader and their own territory; and 3) The people wanted to be like the other nations (1 Samuel 8:4-5). Samuel was disappointed at the people’s request for a king because it showed that they rejected God as their leader and that they rejected him as their judge. God told Samuel, “Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have......

Words: 1016 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

How Did King Tut Die?

... The Mysterious Death of King Tutankhamen  Three thousand years ago after his death the question still remains: How did King Tutankhamen die? Over the years many facts have been shared by well-known scientist, Egyptologist and historians attempting to find out if King Tut was murdered or if his death was accidental. Egyptologist Bob Brier is a strong advocate of the most popular theory, “The Theory of Ay”. He believes King Tuts servants Ay killed him out of greed in order to take over his throne. Another fairly popular theory is the theory that King Tut died from infection due to a broken leg after falling from his chariot. Although both theories have their valid points only one can be true. The most plausible theory is definitely “The Theory of Ay”. According to http://www.kingtutone.com/tutankhamun/murder/ Ay had the motive to kill Tut considering he would be next in line to the throne as long as he married Tuts wife Ankhesenamun. In 1997 Mr. Brier revealed that the ring he found in Cairo proved Ay and Ankhesenamun did indeed get married after the death of King Tut and along with that he also became the new pharaoh of the land. Many people believe the marriage was forced despite Ankhesenamun’s attempt to wed the son of the King of Hittites who was assassinated on his way to wed Ankhesenamun. In addition to “The Theory of Ay” It was also discovered by Bob Brier that there had been a hematoma at the lower base of King Tuts skull, probably caused......

Words: 506 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Did the Revolution War Begin

...Congress. They met in secret because they did not want the British to know that they, the colonies, were uniting. At first there were 44 delegates who met in Carpenter's Hall in Philadelphia, twelve other delegates reported late. Some of those who came were George Washington, Patrick Henry, John Jay, John Adams, and Samuel Adams. Peyton Randolph of Virginia was chosen president, as the first Continental Congress became a school for American leaders. This was like a school for American leaders. They made a list of basic rights they wanted and a list of complaints to send to King George III. They signed a petition demanding the "Intolerable Acts" be repealed and sent it to England. The Continental Association was also created, this was an agreement of the colonies to stop all trade with Britain until their demands were met. The men adjourned the Congress on October 26, 1774 and decided to meet again in May of 1775 in Philadelphia if King George III did not repeal the "Intolerable Acts." On May 5, 1775 the Second Continental Congress met as agreed. There were mixed feelings about what should be done about the continued hostile acts of the British Parliament. Some delegates wanted immediate independence no matter what the cost. Others were still loyal to King George III and even though they did not like the British taxation without representation. They wanted to avoid an all-out war with England. Finally, they decided to go slowly and not make any drastic moves that might start......

Words: 2107 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Why Did the Revolution War Begin

...Congress. They met in secret because they did not want the British to know that they, the colonies, were uniting. At first there were 44 delegates who met in Carpenter's Hall in Philadelphia, twelve other delegates reported late. Some of those who came were George Washington, Patrick Henry, John Jay, John Adams, and Samuel Adams. Peyton Randolph of Virginia was chosen president, as the first Continental Congress became a school for American leaders. This was like a school for American leaders. They made a list of basic rights they wanted and a list of complaints to send to King George III. They signed a petition demanding the "Intolerable Acts" be repealed and sent it to England. The Continental Association was also created, this was an agreement of the colonies to stop all trade with Britain until their demands were met. The men adjourned the Congress on October 26, 1774 and decided to meet again in May of 1775 in Philadelphia if King George III did not repeal the "Intolerable Acts." On May 5, 1775 the Second Continental Congress met as agreed. There were mixed feelings about what should be done about the continued hostile acts of the British Parliament. Some delegates wanted immediate independence no matter what the cost. Others were still loyal to King George III and even though they did not like the British taxation without representation. They wanted to avoid an all-out war with England. Finally, they decided to go slowly and not make any drastic moves that might start......

Words: 2107 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Why Did the Revolution War Begin

...Congress. They met in secret because they did not want the British to know that they, the colonies, were uniting. At first there were 44 delegates who met in Carpenter's Hall in Philadelphia, twelve other delegates reported late. Some of those who came were George Washington, Patrick Henry, John Jay, John Adams, and Samuel Adams. Peyton Randolph of Virginia was chosen president, as the first Continental Congress became a school for American leaders. This was like a school for American leaders. They made a list of basic rights they wanted and a list of complaints to send to King George III. They signed a petition demanding the "Intolerable Acts" be repealed and sent it to England. The Continental Association was also created, this was an agreement of the colonies to stop all trade with Britain until their demands were met. The men adjourned the Congress on October 26, 1774 and decided to meet again in May of 1775 in Philadelphia if King George III did not repeal the "Intolerable Acts." On May 5, 1775 the Second Continental Congress met as agreed. There were mixed feelings about what should be done about the continued hostile acts of the British Parliament. Some delegates wanted immediate independence no matter what the cost. Others were still loyal to King George III and even though they did not like the British taxation without representation. They wanted to avoid an all-out war with England. Finally, they decided to go slowly and not make any drastic moves that might start......

Words: 2107 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Why Is It Important to Make Referrals?

...P4: Report Why is it important to be able to make referrals- It is important to be able to make referrals because it helps the client recover. Counselling sessions are created in order to assist the client with support and a person who listens to the client. If the sessions that are organised, not working out and nothing is changing in the client’s life then the counsellor would make referrals. These referrals would be according to the client’s situation and their satisfaction. Reasons why referrals maybe needed? - Reasons why counsellors refer their clients are because they cannot do anything about their situation or the client may need a referral. For example the counsellor may lack specific skills that they need in order to assist the client. Another reason could be if the client needs a specialist like a psychologist due to mental health problem. Sometimes a session becomes a difficult trial for the counsellor if they have similar experience as them. It would make it hard for them to complete the session as they wouldn’t feel comfortable. Another reason could be that no progression being made. Cultural barriers could also be another reason as the client and counsellor would have views that are in contrast. If the client is not being open to the counsellor, then the counsellor would find it hard to help, as they wouldn’t gain enough information. Another reason could be if the client is self -harming themselves, as this is a serious issue and therefore should be taken......

Words: 1011 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

During the Time of Samuel, Why Did the People of Israel Desire a King? Why Was Saul Chosen, and, Ultimately, Why Was He Rejected? What Attribute Did David Display That Made Him a Better King Than Saul? What Sin Did

...19:5) This was saying that as long as the Israelites had Gods as their king and followed His commands then they would prosper. That is why, during the time of Samuel, God was angered when the people wanted a king on earth; God knew none of the kings chosen would guide the Israelites as they should be and would eventually bring on destruction. Throughout Israel’s history God had provided for them, such as when He provided mana for them to eat while they wandered through the desert. Time and time again the Israelites had chosen to go their own way instead of following the orders God gave. This cycle occurred again during the time of Samuel. During this time the people said, “Give us a king to judge us.” (Samuel 8:6) Even after Samuel had advised the people against having a king appointed, they decided that their way ultimately better than God’s way. God did not fight them, even though He knew the destruction that it would bring, instead He did what they asked. God had a plan for Israel, but the people had decided that God’s way was not efficient enough and that they knew how to govern themselves more efficiently. Saul was everything the Israelites could have wanted in a king; he was tall, good looking, and would triumph in many battles. When Saul first became king he followed God’s commands and gave all the glory to Him, but as time passed he began to lose sight of God’s divine purpose. After being king for some time Saul became greedy and was overcome by pride.......

Words: 989 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Why Did the Second Crusade Fail

...Why did the Second Crusade Fail? There are a number of reasons why the Second Crusade did not succeed. In my opinion, the most important factor in the failure of the Second Crusade was the poor leadership of both Louis VII and Conrad III. Had they been more competent leaders capable of seeing the big picture, they might have made it to the Near East with more of their force intact. The reason I name the poor leadership as the most important factor in their failure is because without good leadership, everything else falls apart. This includes relations with the locals, logistics, military cohesion and the ability to wage an effective campaign. Having two western kings lead the crusade was always going to be problematic as it created rivalry and tension. Furthermore, these two leaders went on the Crusade with very little guidance or instruction from the pope which meant that they were free to push their own agendas in the Near East, which becomes another source of tension. The Second Crusade is full of examples where these two leaders have done more harm than good and examples include; * Conrad losing control of his army in Byzantine territory, causing a riot and hurting relations with Manuel. * Conrad setting up camp in a flood plain, and then getting flooded. * Louis’ forces terrorising local traders. * Louis leaving Conrad and advancing through Mt Cadmus and subsequently getting ambushed by Seljuk archers, taking heavy casualties. Poor leadership is a more...

Words: 622 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Dogs Make the Best Pets

...Dogs Make the Best Pets Dogs come in all shapes and sizes. From tea cup size to giant size, from long hair to short hair and even hairless. With all the different breeds of dogs there is a variety of behavior and personalities and a variety of looks. But with all this variety there is one thing that stays constant – the love and companionship a dog gives. Regardless of the type of dog you chose your little furry friend will become your best friend, your family and if you let them will become part of your heart. There is no other animal that would make a better pet than a dog, no other pet provides more unconditional love and affection, and provides more social interaction and companionship than a dog. A dog expresses love and affection in so many ways, from the affectionate licks on our face, the intimate wagging of their tails, to their hugs when you come home. I cannot think of another species in the universe other than a dog that is capable of expressing their unconditional love and unwavering loyalty. When you think of a pet the two obvious choices that come to mind are a dog or a cat. Some people may try to argue that a cat is a better pet, but a cat does not greet you at the door like a dog, nor is a cat as affectionate as a dog. A cat is more independent than a dog, they tend to come around when they need something where a dog actually identifies with their owners mood. My dog can actually sense my mood and react accordingly; when I am sick or sad my dogs......

Words: 921 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

When the King Took Flight

...When The King Took Flight There are many events that happened in history that makes the world how it is today. Many people don’t realize that society has changed dramatically from the 17th century to now. In those days they dealt with a different type of government system, (monarchy) in which the king is in control of the government. Some kings are great in which they run their country well and have the respect of those around them and beneath them in society, and you also have those who don’t have the respect or the authority to the people. Everyone has their own morals, and what they believe is right and who is to say that Louis XVI was wrong for attempting to flee France. Sometimes people are put into situations where they feel their backs are against the walls, and I believe the King Louis XVI dealt with that feeling in 1791. All his life he was taught and accustomed that the king is supposed to be in charge of his country, and when people look at you as if you don’t exist and don’t even matter sometimes you have to do what you have to do. Even though he might have shown signs of inconsistencies and was very indecisive, at the end of the day he is king and he has the right to be indecisive as much as he likes. You can see from the start of the book, When The King Took Flight, that the people of France whether they were nobles or part of the 3rd estate they showed signs of not favoring a monarchy. Louis had begun to get frustrated to the point he couldn’t......

Words: 690 - Pages: 3

Fairy Tail 33 | Robotics;Notes | Eric Johnson