Why Smoking Should Be Banned Permanently

In: Social Issues

Submitted By wendani
Words 424
Pages 2
Topic: Smoking should be banned permanently


Course: Instructor’s Name: Date: 30th May, 2012

Outline * Title Page * Introduction * Thesis statement * Body * Reasons as to why smoking should be banned permanently. * Conclusion * References

Smoking develops slowly and becomes a hard to drop habit when one becomes addicted. Smoking has a lot of disadvantages and impacts negatively on the smokers’ finances.
Thesis statement: This paper seeks to define the reasons as to why I believe smoking should be banned permanently
Reasons why belief smoking should be banned permanently.
In my view, smoking should be prohibited entirely as the dangers associated with the habit are numerous and the disadvantages by far surpass perceived benefits of smoking.
Firstly, smoking has adverse effects on health. Smoking can cause cancer of the lung, bronchitis and diseases of the heart. This leads to high mortality rates in a country (Bearman, 2011). Studies have also found that smoking contribute to impotence among smokers.
Secondly, smoking is a hugely expensive habit. The cost to an individual smoker is highly significant. For instance, a person smoking two packets a day smokes over 700 packets in one year. Assuming that a pack costs $6, the individual would spend up to $4,200 per year. There are also indirect expenses incurred due to lost productivity and in health care.
Thirdly, the habit of smoking is highly addictive. Nicotine contained in tobacco causes addiction to the smoker. Smokers, therefore, do not easily stop smoking despite serious health problems associated with the practice (Crawford, 2009).
Fourthly, unborn infants are at high risk of death or low birth weight if their mothers smoke. Studies have shown that smoking affects the health of the child as secondhand smoke is equally perilous.
Lastly, secondhand smoke is…...

Similar Documents

Abortion: Why It Should Be Not Be Banned

...Your first name and Last name Professor Who is it Course Title 19 December 2012 Abortion: Why it should be not be banned In the United States and most part of the world, the issue of abortion has sparked a heavy controversy, creating a strong debate over the rights and wrongs of deliberately ending a pregnancy before normal childbirth. There is no denying the fact that, most people today are caught in between the moral dilemma of whether or not to terminate a pregnancy. It is one of the issues in our society today creating not just a political divide, but equally a public and moral one. For example, the Telegraph of December 18, 2012 published its story which reads in part: A Polish Catholic organisation has sparked furore after it compared legal abortion to the Newtown school massacre. On its website the conservative organisation Fronda asked what the difference was between "children killed by doctors and children killed by a madman?" It also questioned whether killing children with parental consent is better than killing children against their will? ( para. 1-3). The above news lead reminds us once again of the opposing views held by different members of the society concerning abortion. Before delving into the argument arena, it is imperative that the term abortion be defined; its historical background briefly discussed, and some arguments in support of ban be examined. This will serve as foundation upon which this work will rest. The Oxford Advanced Learner’s......

Words: 1694 - Pages: 7

Why Smoking Is Bad

...Why smoking is a bad thing Today, smoking is an issue which is on everybody’s mind. The whole country is divided on this issue. Some believe that smoking should be banned everywhere while others are not so harsh. Tobacco, however, should be outlawed because smoking pollutes the environment, endangers everyone’s health, and wastes taxpayers’ money due to health problems. Cigarette smoking causes a number of health problems which are expensive to treat. It is a major cause of respiratory diseases such as asthma, lung cancer and bronchitis. It also leads to heart disease. In spite of the money which the Government receives from taxing cigarettes, the cost of medical treatment for these diseases exceeds this income. Smoking cigarettes can cost people tens of thousands a dollars a year. As a consequence, non-smoking taxpayers are forced to pay for the health costs of smokers, which is a very unfair situation. Another reason for banning smoking is that cigarette smoke affects the health of non- smokers and unborn babies. Cigarettes are not only harmful to users, but are also damaging to all people around a smoker. Non-smokers often suffer from eye and nose irritations, allergies and headaches as a result of inhaling second-hand smoke. Cigarettes cause a high percent of lung cancer and are responsible for thirty percent of all deaths resulting from cancer. People who have smoked for a significant period of time will have noticeable problems breathing......

Words: 422 - Pages: 2

Why Cellphones Should Be Banned While Driving

...phone while driving at moderate or high speeds, at crossroads, and on twisting and turning roads. Can you do without using your cell phone while driving? The use of cell phones may result in a driver's slower reaction while breaking or regaining speed. It may cause accidents but it may be a coincidence with some other action. So, the use of cell phone is not desirable because it involves a driver in a multi-task activity while driving. Young drivers are banned or restricted from using cell phones in 18 American states. In California, young drivers will be ticketed for using any mobile device. I do not know how a young driver will write a term paper on a laptop computer while driving but it is banned as well as a cell phone while driving. Although cell phones may cause problems, no research is available to point to the rise in deaths cause by the use of cell phones while driving. A cell phone, like any mobile device, simple makes a list of possible causes of accidents longer. But safety is safety, so while driving people should be obedient to publicly accepted behavior. A driver may use a cell phone when he or she stops the car. But in foggy weather or on wet and icy roads this driver may be injured by another moving vehicle that will not expect it there. Cell phones are life-threatening means of communication while driving. To be on the safe side, it would be fine to ban the use of cell phones while driving....

Words: 466 - Pages: 2

Smoking Should Be Banned in Public

...Intro: History of Smoking debate in Australia Discussion of first article * Lack of emotional reasons usually associated with smoking * Use of enforceability the main reason presented most logically * Punch line offering a different argument Discussion of cartoon * Humour * Both sides Conclusion Federal law bans smoking in all Australian Commonwealth government buildings, public transport, airports and international and domestic flights. All states are also subject to the plain packaging laws and health warnings of cigarettes and the cost of cigarettes has markedly increased to persuade people not to smoke. There are also varying laws across the states relating to smoking. For Victoria, smoking is banned in all restaurants and bars and enclosed spaces but has been allowed in public spaces. This issue arose in the media when a councillor on the Melbourne City Council sought to have smoking banned in all public spaces. The Age editorial (February 1 2013) ‘Smoke-free should not mean an outright ban’sets out its argument against banning smoking in public spaces is a dispassionate and logical way. What is most apparent about the editorial in its refusal to outline what smoking might do if inhaled by passers-by suggesting that the emotional and medical arguments about smoking are ‘done and dusted’ and most people accept that smoking is bad for health. Instead, the article puts forward the argument that smoking in public spaces in ‘unenforceable’. This......

Words: 765 - Pages: 4

Should Guns Be Banned

...launcher, barrel shroud, or threaded barrel, along with others (Hartmann). Hartmann of the New York News and Features stated, “Though the new legislation lays out the features of an assault weapon, figuring out if a particular weapon is banned is even more complicated. The bill prohibits 150 specific guns, and excludes 2,250 firearms used for hunting or other sport.” Staunch anti-gun control advocates argue that is hard to ignore that James Holmes, the infamous Batman Shooter who took four guns into the movie theatres the night he opened fire would still have had access to at least two of the guns that he used (Nwanevu). However, though the argument of banning assault weapons builds primarily around the idea that not only are assault rifles often times not used in mass killings and that the classification of assault weapons would prove to be very hard under the new Congressional bill, but their argument is also based upon the idea the assault weapon band of 1994 was found to be inconclusive (Lee). Numerous studies were conducted regarding the effectiveness of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban. A particular study by Roth and Koper of the Department of Justice revealed that there were little if any difference in number of murder due to the fact that the banned weapons and magazines were rarely if ever involved in gun related murders (Lee). Anti-gun control advocates argue that if the ban of 1994 did little to influence the safety of the American citizens, how would a ban in 2013......

Words: 2236 - Pages: 9

Smoking in Public Places and Why It Should Be Banned.

...For many years people have been smoking and other people have been complaining about it. It’s been a continuous war against why or why not smoking should be allowed in public places. On one hand, you can go outside your home and say have a drink with some friends at a bar, on the other hand you’re going to a restaurant to celebrate your son or daughters graduation and you have to breathe in the smoke from across the room. Smoking in public places subjects people who don’t care to smoke to second hand smoking, which is said to have worse effects then firsthand smoking. The effects of smoking are not a good thing any way you look at it. It causes lung cancer, it causes you to have hard time breathing, and it could even cause you to lose your voice. This is why I believe that smoking should be banned from public places. I think smoking in bars is fine. Let there be a designated public place outside the home to smoke, but keep it contained. Don’t make people who don’t want to breathe in the pollution feel like they can’t get away from it. Smoking needs to be banned from public places. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The price of cigarettes is twice as expensive then a gallon of gasoline these days. There are people that smoke more than one pack a day. At an average of $8.00 a pack, people could easily waste half a paycheck a month just on......

Words: 278 - Pages: 2

Why Assault Weapons Should Not Be Banned

...these crimes. Opening: Good morning Senators, thank you for allowing me the opportunity to speak today. A man enters a crowded public area; he places the stock of his gun against his hip and pulls the trigger, holding it down as he firing indiscriminately into the crowd killing dozens of innocents in mere seconds. Is this the type of image that comes to mind when someone mentions the word assault rifle? It was when I first heard the term, but this stigma is incorrect and unfair. The weapon I have described is not in fact an assault rifle but rather a military grade machine gun. Anyone in his or her right mind would agree that no average citizen would ever have the need to possess a fully automatic military grade firearm. That is why machine guns such as I described are as illegal today as they have been for the past twenty-seven years. Narration: It is being proposed today that banning assault rifles would be beneficial in protecting the American people. That if people are no longer allowed to purchase these weapons, gun violence will decrease. I believe that the United States does have a problem of gun violence. I believe that action does need to be taken to protect its citizens against dangerous criminals with guns. I believe that banning assault rifles is not the correct way to do this. Division: Assault rifles are not, as their name would indicate, fully automatic military-grade tools of death. So what is an assault rifle? An assault rifle......

Words: 1151 - Pages: 5

Cigarette Smoking Should Not Be Banned

...10/21/2014 Cigarette Smoking Should Not Be Banned Every time one of those anti-smoking commercials come on tv, it’s always questionable about how people can still continue to smoke after seeing something so graphic. Especially the one where the woman is in the bathroom, and her face starts to basically peel off. So gross! Why would someone still want to smoke, knowing that it completely destroys their body? Maybe, because people know that those commercials are just scare tactics, and that someone’s face is not literally going to peel off from smoking. Smoking, just like drinking, or even driving, is risky, but it’s also a choice. They would never ban driving, even after all of the deaths caused every day. They definitely wouldn’t try banning alcohol again, even after all the deaths it still causes. So, why should they ban smoking? Smoking is a personal choice(Jeffery, 2). It doesn’t alter the state of mind like drugs or alcohol(contrary to what some people may say). If anything, the only person being harmed, is the person inhaling the smoke. Cigarettes don’t only contain toxins. They contain nicotine, which isn’t harmful, but is very addictive, just like caffeine, and there are millions of people out there who are definitely more addicted to their morning coffee or soda than there are people who smoke cigarettes. Smoking can be harmful, but usually in only excessive amounts, just like junk 2 food, or soda, or anything else in the world. Should they start banning......

Words: 578 - Pages: 3

Why the Use of Cell Phone Should Be Banned While Drving

...Regina Dodson Student ID AC1400470 SP180.1.1 Principles of Public Speaking Assignment 06_06 02-07-2014 I Believe and Persuaded the Use of Cell Phones Should Be Mandatorily Banned Nationwide To Prevent Unnecessary Distractive Driving Banning the use of cell phones should be made mandatory nationwide while driving because it is a one of the nations’ top killers in America. Driving while being distracted kills thousands of people every year. Yet many drivers think they are good at managing both tasks so they continue to text behind the wheel. A car travels approximately 100 yards in less than the 5 seconds it takes to read a text. Texting distracts people from driving properly by diverting their attention to their cell phone, instead of focusing on the road. Furthermore, studies show that texting is as dangerous as driving while intoxicated. Subjects are found to be mentally impaired while driving and chatting on a mobile device as when they are under the influence. These are the top reasons why I believe and am convinced that driving while on a cell phone should be banned in America. Cell Phone Usage as Top Killer in America National statistics show that cell phone usage while driving has become one of the nation’s top killers on our roadways today. According to the Texting and Driving Safety Statistics an average of 1,600,000 accidents are reported each year due to texting while driving. Nearly 25 percent of all accidents nationwide, 11 percent of which are teenagers...

Words: 1305 - Pages: 6

Cigarettes Should Be Banned or Not

...Running head: CIGARETTES SHOULD BE BANNED OR NOT Should cigarettes be made illegal? Submitted by: Student ID: Tutor’s Name: * Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Background of the study 3 1.2 Cigarettes themselves should not be illegal. 4 2. Conclusion 4 References 6 1. Introduction If we think for a moment why people in our society smokes? Despite of the fact that it has extreme and awful effects and there are no particular reasons that it must be legal for anybody. Heart disease, cancers and lung disease are only few of the hundreds of harmful impacts of smoking. What amazes me is why anybody would like to smoke if they truly know how it annihilates their body, also why society wants to keep it legal in any case. In this article, I would say smoking must be made illegal. Various people argue that smoking must not be banned; perhaps the reason is that it’s their personal freedom since smoking is exceptionally addictive and individuals get to be dependent to it. So we will find out in this essay that what makes them saying this. However, if what just leaves smoking is joy, shouldn't the government set health over delight? 2.1 Background of the study Around 400,000 deaths every year in U.S. alone are due to smoking ailments. Why might somebody even get a cigarette without focusing the effects it can cause him or her? Banning of cigarettes must be made legal as cigarettes are an addicting and effective drug which is......

Words: 728 - Pages: 3

Smoking Should Not Be Allowed on Campuses

...Smoking Should Not Be Allowed On Campuses Because of the improvement of technology, it is easier and more affordable to buy cigarettes. Smoking becomes general phenomenon. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US CDC), there are an estimated 42.1 million adults in the United States currently smoke cigarettes. However, the report also said that more than 2.4 million people died in the USA annually, and over 480,000 people died because of smoking. Medical News Today (2013) said that smokers died ten years sooner than non-smoker. Besides, there are close to 20 million college students in The U.S.A (Nation Center for Education Statistic, 2015) and 30% of them smoke (The MU School of Medicine, 2013). To be more precise, there are 6 million college students smoke on campuses. Rigotti (2000) also said that almost 40% of students started to smoke in college and 28% of them became regular smokers. The numbers of college students smoking on the campuses are too huge to ignore. In my opinion, smoking should be prohibited on college campuses. I have three major reasons that smoking should not be allowed on campuses. Firstly, smoking may cause the pollution. When people light cigarette, inhale deeply, and let out, the air becomes bad and stinks. It causes air pollution. Not so many people like this unpleasant smell. The air pollution may distract students in class or study when they smell it. Moreover, if people smoke on the corridor or in the......

Words: 753 - Pages: 4

The Environmental Implications of Hydraulic Fracturing and Why It Should Be Banned

...Air and water are the most vital resources on this earth and hydraulic fracturing is threatening the reliability of the world’s resources at a startling rate, effectively destroying water and air supplies with chemical contamination. What happens when water no longer flows from the faucet, shower, or hose? What happens when the air outside is no longer breathable? This is a frightening prospect which has led to one solution, the process of hydraulic fracturing should be banned to avoid many significant environmental risks. Research has shown hydraulic fracturing has been the cause of numerous environmentally damaging incidents, the most significantly documented is the ground water contamination specifically the detrimental chemicals. “Drinking water sources have been contaminated with explosive methane, as well as other dangerous substances, such as benzene and arsenic, that can cause cancer and other serious illnesses.” (Thompson 2013). The fact that these chemicals are leeching into the public’s drinking water and private wells shows the severity of the impact that fracking is having on the environment. "We don't know if they're connecting to another natural seam in the formation that lets gas or possibly toxic fluids migrate into water supplies," he said. "We do know from a study by Duke University in Marcellus Shale that 68 water wells in New York and 51 in Pennsylvania have been contaminated with hazardous levels of methane, where the risk of explosion in the water......

Words: 1231 - Pages: 5

Why Smoking Should Be Banned Permanently?

...A brown study – day dreaming 2) Alive and kicking - healthy 3) All and sundry - every one 4) All of a sudden - un expectedly 5) Apple of one’s eye – favourite 6) As cool as a cucumber - calm 7) At the top of – loudly 8) At sixes and sevens - confused 9) At draggers dawn - hostile 10) Bad tempered - grumpy 11) Bear in mind - remember 12) Black and white - writing 13) Bolt from the blue - unexpected 14) Bring to light - discover 15) Build castle in the air - day dream 16) Burst at the seams - overcrowded 17) By all means - certainly 18) By the skin of one’s teeth - narrowly 19) Case in point - example 20) Catch sight of - see 21) ...

Words: 377 - Pages: 2

Cigarettes Should Be Banned F

...Cigarettes should be banned from this topic. Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. There are approximately 600 ingredients in cigarettes. When burned, they create more than 7,000 chemicals. At least 69 of these chemicals are known to cause cancer, and many are poisonous. Tobacco smoke consists of many harmful chemical, that was responsible for more than 100 million deaths worldwide in the 20th Century. The World Health Organization has estimated that, if current trends continue, tobacco could cause a billion deaths in the 21st Century. So based on these studies, I strongly agree that cigarettes should be banned. First of all, it has been proven that tobacco consists of carcinogenic compounds which cause serious harm to a person’s health, not only the smoker. So anyone around them included the smoker could develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat, and other sites in the body. It is simply not fair to impose this upon another person. It is also the case that people’s health is more important than businesses. In any case, pubs and restaurants could adapt to a ban by, for example, allowing smoking areas. Besides, we all complain about the high medical costs and taxes yet we do not see that children and asthmatics often need medical care more than they should because of smoking around them. It is also expensive for the smoker as it is a costly habit which affects the family’s...

Words: 351 - Pages: 2

Should Smoking Be Banned

...I am under pressure”. They smoke everytime, everywhere and can not give up smoking. Without holding a cigarette, they will feel uncomfortable like loosing a best friend. They think that smoking is a good leisure activity and somehow can also be good for their health. However, other people think that smoking should be banned due to its negative effects. Opponents of banning smoking claim that smoking undoubtedly helps them to relax, for some people, it even improve their concentration. However, a large number of research studies show that smoking increases people’s likelihood of developing certain diseases (compared with people who have never smoked) and causes earlier death. Thus, if people never began smoking, the prevalence of those smoking-attributable diseases would decline, and life expectancy would increase. The medical research also finds that ceasing to smoke improves health. The risks of many smoking-attributable diseases decline after quitting, although a smoker does not have the same health as someone who has never smoked. Opponents also maintain that smoking is the smokers choice, and they will pay for their health problems. However, such an argument ignores the fact that there are many people around them when they are smoking. Studies show that secondhand smoke—the inhalation of smoke by someone other than the smoker, sometimes referred to as environmental tobacco smoke or passive smoking—has also been linked to a number of illnesses. Among newborn and......

Words: 435 - Pages: 2

Iko Uwais | Sicario El Dia Del Soldado BluRay-Screeener | Wallpapers